Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(AMENDMENT NO.          )

Filed by the Registrant     

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant     

Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12


AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)


Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:

Persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB control number.




Table of Contents

Agilent Technologies, Inc.


5301 Stevens Creek Blvd.
Boulevard
Santa Clara, California 95051

Michael R. McMullen
Chief Executive Officer



February 2016

To our Stockholders:

I am pleased to invite you to attend the annual meeting of stockholders of Agilent Technologies, Inc. (“Agilent”) to be held on Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 8:00 a.m., Pacific Time, at Agilent’s headquarters located at 5301 Stevens Creek Blvd., Building No. 5, Santa Clara, California (U.S.A.). Details regarding admission to the annual meeting and the business to be conducted are more fully described in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement.

If you are unable to attend the annual meeting in person, you may listen through the Internet or by telephone. To listen to the live webcast, log on at www.investor.agilent.com and select the link for the webcast. To listen by telephone, please call (877) 312-5529 (international callers should dial (253) 237-1147). The meeting identification number is 94999805. The webcast will begin at 8:00 a.m. and will remain on Agilent’s website for one year. You cannot record your vote or ask questions on this website or at this phone number.

We have elected to take advantage of Securities and Exchange Commission rules that allow issuers to furnish proxy materials to their stockholders on the Internet. We believe that the rules allow us to provide our stockholders with the information they need, while lowering the costs of delivery and reducing the environmental impact of the annual meeting.

Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, I hope that you will vote as soon as possible. Please review the instructions on each of your voting options described in the Proxy Statement and the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials you received in the mail.

Thank you for your ongoing support of, and continued interest in, Agilent.

Sincerely,


Admission to the annual meeting will be limited to stockholders. You are entitled to attend the annual meeting only if you are a stockholder of record as of the close of business on January 19, 2016, the record date, or hold a valid proxy for the meeting. In order to be admitted to the annual meeting, you must present proof of ownership of Agilent stock on the record date. This can be a brokerage statement or letter from a bank or broker indicating ownership on January 19, 2016, the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, a proxy card, or legal proxy or voting instruction card provided by your broker, bank or nominee. Any holder of a proxy from a stockholder must present the proxy card, properly executed, and a copy of the proof of ownership. Stockholders and proxyholders may also be asked to present a form of photo identification such as a driver’s license or passport. Backpacks, cameras, cell phones with cameras, recording equipment and other electronic recording devices will not be permitted at the annual meeting. Agilent reserves the right to inspect any persons or proposals prior to their admission to the annual meeting. Failure to follow the meeting rules or permit inspection will be grounds for exclusion from the annual meeting.



Table of Contents

AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

5301 Stevens Creek Blvd.
Santa Clara, California 95051

(408) 553-2424

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders

TIME

:

8:00 a.m., Pacific Time, on Wednesday, March 16, 201621, 2018

PLACE

:

Agilent’s

Corporate Headquarters

5301 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Building No. 5

Santa Clara, California (U.S.A.)95051 USA

ITEMS OF BUSINESS

AGENDA

:

(1)

1.   To elect three directors to a 3-yearthree-year term. At the annual meeting, the Board of Directors intends to present the following nominees for election as directors:

  Koh Boon Hwee

Paul N. Clark
  Michael R. McMullen; and

James G. Cullen; and

Tadataka Yamada,  Daniel K. Podolsky, M.D.

(2)

2.   To approve the amendment and restatement of our 2009 Stock Plan.

3.   To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers.

4.   To ratify the Audit and Finance Committee’s appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Agilent’sour independent registered public accounting firm.

(3) To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of Agilent’s named executive officers.
(4) To approve amendments to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to declassify the Board.
(5)

5.   To consider such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting.

RECORD DATE

:

You are entitled to vote at the annual meeting and at any adjournments, postponements or postponementscontinuations thereof if you were a stockholder at the close of business on Tuesday, January 19, 2016.23, 2018.

ANNUAL MEETING ADMISSION

VOTING

:

For instructions on voting, please refer to the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials you received in the mail or, if you received a hard copy of the Proxy Statement, on your enclosed proxy card.

ADMISSION

:

To be admitted to the annual meeting, you must present proof of ownership of Agilentour stock as of the record date. This can be a brokerage statement or letter from a bank or broker indicating ownership on January 19, 2016,23, 2018, the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, a proxy card, or legal proxy or voting or voting instruction card provided by your broker, bank or nominee. You may also be asked to present a form of photo identification such as a driver’s license or passport. The annual meeting will begin promptly at 8:00 a.m. Limited seating is available on a first come, first served basis.

VOTING

WEBCAST

:

For instructions on voting, please refer

If you are unable to attend the annual meeting in person, you may listen through the Internet or by telephone. To listen to the instructionslive webcast, log on at www.investor.agilent.com and select the link for the webcast. To listen by telephone, please call (877) 312-5529 (international callers should dial (253) 237-1147).  The meeting identification number is 9585968. The webcast will begin at 8:00 a.m. and will remain on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials you received in the mailcompany’s website for one year. You cannot record your vote or if you received a hard copy of the Proxy Statement,ask questions on your enclosed proxy card.this website or at this phone number.


By Order of the Board of Directors

MICHAELTANG

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Secretary


This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy card are being sent or made available

on or about February 4, 2016.
7, 2018.




Table of Contents

SUMMARY INFORMATION


CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This proxy statement contains forward-looking statements as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is subject to the safe harbors created therein. The forward-looking statements contained herein are generally identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “strategy,” “future,” “opportunity,” “plan,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs and assumptions of Agilent’sour management and on currently available information. A detailed discussion of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from such forward-looking statements is included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015. Agilent undertakes2017.  We undertake no responsibility to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement.

PROXY SUMMARY

The following is a summary which highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider, and you are urged to read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.

Voting Matters and Vote Recommendations

There areWe currently expect to consider four items of business which Agilent currently expects to be considered at the Annual Meeting.2018 annual meeting. The following table lists those items of business and the Agilentour Board’s vote recommendation.

 

PROPOSAL

BOARD RECOMMENDATION

REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION

MORE INFORMATION

(1)

Election of three directors to a three-year term

FOR

The Board and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee believe our nominees possess the skills, experience and qualifications to effectively monitor performance, provide oversight and support management’s execution of our long-term strategy.

5

 

(2)

Approval of the Amendment and Restatement of 2009 Stock Plan

FOR

The Board strongly believes that its equity compensation programs and emphasis on employee stock ownership have been integral to the Company’s success and that a continuation of those programs is necessary for the Company to achieve superior performance in the future.

18

(3)

Advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers

FOR

Our executive compensation program incorporates a number of compensation governance best practices and reflects our commitment to pay for performance.

55

(4)

Ratification of the independent registered public accounting firm

FOR

Based on its assessment, the Board and the Audit and Finance Committee believe that the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is in the best interests of the company and our stockholders.

56

2


PROPOSAL

BOARD VOTE RECOMMENDATION

(1)
Election of DirectorsFor each director nominee
(2)Ratification of the Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmFor
(3)Advisory vote to approve Named Executive Officer CompensationFor
(4)Amendments to our Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation and Bylaws to declassify the Board
For

SUMMARY INFORMATION


Director Nominees

Agilent’sOur Board is currently divided into three classes serving staggered three-year terms.  Robert J. Herbold’s current term expires at the annual meeting and he will not stand for re-election as he has reached the mandatory retirement age as set forth in our Corporate Governance Standards.   The following table provides summary information about each of the three director nominees who are being voted on at the Annual Meeting.annual meeting.   

COMMITTEEOTHER
DIRECTORINDE-MEMBERSHIPSPUBLIC
NAMEAGESINCEOCCUPATIONPENDENTACCCNCGECBOARDS
Paul N. Clark682006Strategic Advisory BoardYesMM2
 Member of Genstar
Capital, LLC  
James G. Cullen732000Retired President andYesCC4
Chief Operating Officer of  
Bell Atlantic Corporation
(now known as Verizon)
Tadataka Yamada, M.D.702011Venture Partner, LifeYesMM
Sciences Team, and Senior
Advisor, Growth Buyout
Team, Frazier Healthcare

Key: 

AC: Audit Committee; CC: Compensation Committee; NCG: Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee; EC: Executive
Committee; C: Chairperson; M: Member



 

 

DIRECTOR

SINCE

 

COMMITTEE

MEMBERSHIPS

NAME

AGE

OCCUPATION

Koh Boon Hwee

67

2003

Managing Partner

  Executive (Chair)

 

 

 

Credence Capital Fund II (Cayman) Ltd.

  Nominating/Corporate Governance (Chair)

 

 

 

 

 

Michael R. McMullen

56

2015

President and Chief Executive Officer

  Executive

 

 

 

Agilent Technologies, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Daniel K. Podolsky, M.D.

64

2015

President

  Audit and Finance

 

 

 

University of Texas Southwestern

  Nominating/Corporate Governance

 

 

 

Medical Center

 


TableCorporate Governance Highlights

The Board is committed to sound and effective governance practices that promote long-term stockholder value and strengthen Board and management accountability to our stockholders, customers and other stakeholders. The following table highlights many of Contents

SUMMARY INFORMATION


New Executive Officer Compensation Program

Listening to Our Shareholders

Agilent has historically received over 90% shareholder supportour key governance practices.  Specific details on our “Say-on-Pay” proposals along with support from the major shareholder advisory firms. However, early in 2015 the major shareholder advisory firms recommended an “Against” votegovernance practices can be found starting on our fiscal year 2014 Say on Pay proposal. In response, our Compensation Committee Chair and members of management met with 15 of our largest shareholders who own more than 40% of Agilent’s outstanding shares to hear their concerns. While our fiscal year 2014 Say on Pay proposal passed with 60% shareholder support, we were disappointed with this result and commenced a full review of our programs. Following these meetings, the Compensation Committee, our independent Compensation Committee consultant, and Agilent management considered the feedback received from shareholders and proposed a number of changes to our executive compensation programs for fiscal year 2016. In August 2015, our Compensation Committee Chair and members of management met again with 8 of our largest shareholders to preview our proposed program design changes. The feedback on our proposals was positive and in September, the Compensation Committee approved the design changes set forth below and as more fully described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and Executive Compensation sections of the proxy statement to take effect in fiscal year 2016.page 12.

ProgramFY15 DesignFY16 Design
Performance PeriodSemi-AnnualAnnual
Primary Financial
Metrics
Operating Margin
(“OM”) / Revenue
Return on Invested Capital
 (“ROIC”) / Revenue
Stock Options50% of target LTI valuen/a
(Time-Based Vesting)
LTPP Shares50% of target LTI value30% of target LTI value
(Relative Total
Shareholder
Return (“TSR”))
LTPP Sharesn/a30% of target LTI value
(Financial Metric:
OM for FY16)
RSUsn/a40% of target LTI value
(Time-Based Vesting)
One Year Post-VestNoneApply to LTPP and RSUs
Holding Period

2X cap on LTPP shares
✓ No cap on payout dollar value

Lower of:
Payout Caps✓ 2X cap on # of shares
✓ 3X cap on payout dollar value

The Compensation Committee will continue to consider the outcome of the Company’s say-on-pay votes when making future compensation decisions for the named executive officers.



Table of Contents

SUMMARY INFORMATION


Business Highlights

Fiscal Year 2015 was a momentous year for Agilent. We entered the year as a stand-alone Life Sciences, Diagnostics and Applied Markets company, having just completed the spin-off of Keysight Technologies. On March 18, 2015, we appointed Mike McMullen as Agilent’s 3rd Chief Executive Officer, succeeding Bill Sullivan who announced his decision to retire last year. This year also marks Agilent’s 50th anniversary in analytical instrumentation.

Agilent is a global leader in life sciences, diagnostics and applied chemical markets and the premier laboratory partner for a better world. Ultimately, our fiscal year 2015 results reflect the dedication and passion of over 12,000 employees worldwide, in more than 100 countries providing instruments, software, services and consumables for the entire laboratory workflow. A few of our most notable performance highlights include the following:

We closed the acquisitionsTen of (a) Cartagenia, a provider of software solutions for variant assessment and reporting of clinical genomics data from next-generation sequencing and microarrays in May 2015 and (b) Seahorse Bioscience, a leading provider of instruments and assay kits for measuring cell metabolism and bioenergetics. Seahorse’s unique technology is the perfect complement to Agilent’s market-leading separations and mass spec solutions, in particular for metabolomics and disease research in pharma in November 2015.
our 11 directors are independent

Annual board self-assessment process, including peer evaluations

We returned $400 million to shareholders

Independent standing board committees

Majority voting and director resignation policy in the form of dividends and buybacks and generated $491 million in operating cash flow.
uncontested director elections

Our Life Sciences

Strong independent lead director

Continued assessment of highly qualified, diverse and Applied Markets Group(“LSAG”) introducedindependent candidates for nomination to the following new products:
board

The 5977B High Efficiency Source (HES) GC/MSD System, a tandem gas chromatograph and mass spectrometer that delivers lower limits

Regular meetings of detection than any other instrument in its class.

The 4200 TapeStation system, a fully automated instrument that enables scientists to rapidly analyze up to 96 DNA samples at a time, and sets a new sample QC standard for next-gen sequencing; and
The 1290 Infinity II Vialsampler that shortens injection cycles, lowers carryover and enlarges sample capacity-at a pressure range of up to 1300 bar.
our independent directors without management present

Strong focus on pay-for-performance

Diverse board with an effective mix of skills, experience and perspectives

Proactive stockholder engagement

Our Diagnostics

Four new independent directors added during the past four years

Policies prohibiting hedging, short selling and Genomics Group (“DGG”) partneredpledging of our common stock

Varied lengths of Board tenure with Merck & Co.an average tenure of 7 years for directors whose terms continue after this annual meeting

Stock ownership guidelines for executive officers and Bristol-Myers Squibb and received FDA approval of two new companion diagnostic tests for Merck’s Keytruda and Bristol Myers Squibb’s OPTDIVO therapies, both drugs targeted at treating non-small cell lung cancer.directors


3




Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS


20162018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

7

5

Director Nomination Criteria: Qualifications and Experience7

Director Nominees for Election to New Three-Year Terms That Will Expire in 20192021

8

5

Continuing Directors Not Being Considered for Election at this Annual Meeting10

Directors Whose Terms Will Expire in 20172019

10

7

Directors Whose Terms Will Expire in 20182020

11

8

COMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

14

10

Summary of Non-Employee Director Annual Compensation for the 20152017 Plan Year

14

10

Non-Employee Director Compensation for Fiscal Year 20152017

15

11

Non-Employee Director Reimbursement Practice for Fiscal Year 2015

16

11

Non-Employee Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

16

11

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS

17

12

Board Leadership Structure

17

12

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

17

12

Majority Voting for Directors

18

12

Board Communications

18

13

Director Stockholder Meeting Attendance

13

Director Independence

18

13

Compensation Committee Member Independence

19

13

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORSDirector Nomination Criteria: Qualifications and Experience

20

14

AuditCompensation Committee Interlocks and Finance CommitteeInsider Participation

20

14

Compensation CommitteeCommittees of the Board of Directors

21

15

Nominating/Corporate Governance CommitteeRelated Person Transactions Policy and Procedures

22

16

Executive Committee23
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION23
RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS POLICY AND PROCEDURES23

Transactions with Related Persons

24

16

PROPOSAL 2 – APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF 2009 STOCK PLAN

18

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

28

Executive Summary

29

Determining Executive Pay

31

Fiscal Year 2017 Compensation

34

Additional Information

40

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

44

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

45

Summary Compensation Table

45

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

46

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

47

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

48

Pension Benefits

49

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

51

Termination and Change of Control Arrangements

52

PROPOSAL 3 – ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

55

PROPOSAL 4 – RATIFICATION OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

56

ACCOUNTING FIRMAUDIT MATTERS

26

57

Fees Paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

26

57

Policy on Audit and Finance Committee Preapproval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit

Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

27

57

AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

28

58

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSISBENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP

29

59

Named Executive Officers for Fiscal Year 2015Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

30

59

IntroductionStock Ownership of Directors and Officers

30

60

Executive Summary31
Compensation Philosophy35
Determining Executive Pay37
Fiscal Year 2015 Compensation39
Additional Information49
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION51
Summary Compensation Table51
Long-term Incentive Awards52
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Last Fiscal Year53



Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS


2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End54
Option Exercises and Stock Vested at Fiscal Year-End56
Pension Benefits56
Retirement Plan57
Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan57
Supplemental Benefit Retirement Plan58
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation in Last Fiscal Year58
Pension Plans59
International Relocation Benefit Plan60
Termination and Change of Control Arrangements60
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT64
PROPOSAL 3 – NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION
OF AGILENT’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS65
PROPOSAL 4 – APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS TO DECLASSIFY THE BOARD66
COMMON STOCK OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT67
Beneficial Ownership Tables67
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

68

60

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING

69

61

Why did I receive a one-page notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxyAPPENDIX A

A-1

materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?APPENDIX B

69

B-1

Why am I receiving these materials?

69
Who is soliciting my proxy?69
What is included in these materials?69
What information is contained in these materials?69
What shares owned by me can be voted?69
What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a
beneficial owner?70
How can I vote my shares in person at the annual meeting?70
How can I vote my shares without attending the annual meeting?70
Can I revoke my proxy or change my vote?70
How are votes counted?71
What is the voting requirement to approve each of the proposals?71
What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice, proxy or voting instruction card?72
Where can I find the voting results of the annual meeting?72
What happens if additional proposals are presented at the annual meeting?72
What is the quorum requirement for the annual meeting?72
Who will count the vote?73
Is my vote confidential?73
Who will bear the cost of soliciting votes for the annual meeting?73
May I propose actions for consideration at next year’s annual meeting of stockholders or
nominate individuals to serve as directors?73
How do I obtain a separate set of proxy materials if I share an address with
other stockholders?74
If I share an address with other stockholders of Agilent, how can we get only one set of voting
materials for future meetings?74


4




Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Director Nomination Criteria: Qualifications and Experience

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee (the “Nominating Committee”) performs an assessment of the skills and the experience needed to properly oversee the interests of the Company. Generally the Nominating Committee reviews both the short and long term strategies of the Company to determine what current and future skills and experience are required of the Board in exercising its oversight function. The Nominating Committee then compares those skills to the skills of the current directors and potential director candidates. The Nominating Committee conducts targeted efforts to identify and recruit individuals who have the qualifications identified through this process. The Nominating Committee looks for its current and potential directors collectively to have a mix of skills and qualifications, some of which are described below:

a reputation for personal and professional integrity and ethics;
executive or similar policy-making experience in relevant business or technology areas or national prominence in an academic, government or other relevant field;
breadth of experience;
soundness of judgment;
the ability to make independent, analytical inquiries;
the willingness and ability to devote the time required to perform Board activities adequately;
the ability to represent the total corporate interests of Agilent; and
the ability to represent the long-term interests of stockholders as a whole.

In addition to these minimum requirements, the Nominating Committee will also consider whether the candidate’s skills are complementary to the existing Board members’ skills; the diversity of the Board in factors such as age, experience in technology, manufacturing, finance and marketing, international experience and culture; and the Board’s needs for specific operational, management or other expertise. The Nominating Committee from time to time reviews the appropriate skills and characteristics required of board members, including factors that it seeks in board members such as diversity of business experience, viewpoints and, personal background, and diversity of skills in technology, finance, marketing, international business, financial reporting and other areas that are expected to contribute to an effective Board of Directors. In evaluating potential candidates for the Board of Directors, the Nominating Committee considers these factors in the light of the specific needs of the Board of Directors at that time.

Current Director Terms

Agilent’sOur Board is divided into three classes serving staggered three-year terms. Directors for each class are elected at the annual meeting of stockholders held in the year in which the term for their class expires.  Agilent’sOur Bylaws, as amended, allow the Board to fix the number of directors by resolution. Our Board currently consists of teneleven directors divided into three classes.

If Proposal 4 is approved by the requisite percentage of stockholders at the Annual Meeting, the Company will transition to a declassified structure under which the entire Board will stand for election annually beginning in 2019. As part of the transition, at the Annual Meetings of Stockholders in 2017 and 2018, each of the Class II and Class III directors, respectively, will begin standing for annual election. The proposed amendments will not affect the unexpired term of any director elected prior to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2017.



Table of Contents

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


The terms of the three director nomineesfour directors will expire at this annual meeting.  However, Robert J. Herbold will not stand for re-election at the annual meeting as he has reached the mandatory retirement age as set forth in our Corporate Governance Standards.   In addition, James G. Cullen has also reached the mandatory retirement age as set forth in our Corporate Governance Standards and will retire immediately before the annual meeting.  

On January 17, 2018, the Board, upon the recommendation of its Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, increased the size of the Board from 11 to 12 members and appointed Dow R. Wilson to fill the vacancy so created, both effective March 20, 2018. Mr. Wilson was appointed to serve as a Class II director and will stand for re-election at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Mr. Wilson will serve on the Audit and Finance Committee and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee of our Board.

Mr. Wilson, age 58, has served as president, chief executive officer and a member of the Board of Directors of Varian Medical Systems, Inc. (“Varian Medical”) since September 2012.  Prior to that, Mr. Wilson served in various capacities with Varian, including executive vice president and chief operating officer from October 2011 to September 2012 and vice president Varian Medical and president of Varian Medical Oncology Systems business from January 2005 to September 2011.  Prior to joining Varian Medical in 2005, Mr. Wilson held various senior management positions with GE Healthcare, a diversified industrial company.  Mr. Wilson serves on the board of directors of Varex Imaging Corporation, a manufacturer of X-ray imaging components.

As a result of the retirements of Messrs. Cullen and Herbold and the appointment of Mr. Wilson, the Board intends to reduce the authorized number of directors to ten, effective immediately upon the adjournment of the Annual Meeting.  The current composition of the Board and the term expiration dates for each director is as follows:

Class

Directors

Term Expires

I

Class

Directors

Term Expires

III

Robert J. Herbold, Koh Boon Hwee, Michael R. McMullen and Daniel K. Podolsky, M.D.

2018

I

Hans E. Bishop, Paul N. Clark, James G. Cullen and Tadataka Yamada, M.D.

2016

2019

II

Heidi Fields,Kunz, Sue H. Rataj and George A. Scangos, Ph.D.PhD

2017
IIIRobert J. Herbold, Koh Boon Hwee, Michael R. McMullen and
Daniel K. Podolsky, M.D.
2018

2020


Director Nominees for Election to New Three-Year Terms That Will Expire in 2021

Directors elected at the 20162018 annual meeting will hold office for a three-year term expiring at the annual meeting in 20192021 (or until their respective successors are elected and qualified, or until their earlier death, resignation or removal). All nominees are currently directorsserving as our directors. To the best knowledge of Agilent.the Board, all of the nominees are able and willing to serve.  Each nominee has consented to be named in this proxy statement and to serve if elected.  Information regarding each nominee is provided below as of December 31, 2015.2017. There are no family relationships among Agilent’sour executive officers and directors.

Director Nominees for Election to New Three-Year Terms That Will Expire in 2019

PAUL N. CLARK

KOH BOON HWEE

Age: 67
Director Since: May 2003

Board Committees:

Other Public Directorships:

Age:

68

Agilent Committees:

Executive (Chair)

Nominating/Corporate Governance (Chair)

Public Directorships:

AAC Technologies Holdings, Inc. Sunningdale Tech, Ltd.

Yeo Hiap Seng Ltd.

Director Since:      Audit and Finance      Biolase, Inc.

Far East Orchard Ltd.

May 2006      Nominating/Corporate Governance      Keysight Technologies, Inc.

Former Public Directorships Held During the Past Five Years:

   

Yeo Hiap Seng (Malaysia) Bhd.

Mr. Koh has served as non-Executive Chairman of our Board since March 2017.  Mr. Koh is the managing partner of Credence Capital Fund II (Cayman) Ltd., a private equity fund. Mr. Koh has served as the non-Executive Chairman of Sunningdale Tech Ltd. since January 2009 and previously served as its Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from July 2005 to January 2009. He has served as the non-Executive Chairman of Yeo Hiap Seng Ltd. since April 2010, the non-Executive Chairman of Rippledot Capital

5


PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Advisers Pte. Ltd. since February 2011 and the non-Executive Chairman of Far East Orchard Ltd. since April 2013. He served as Executive Director of MediaRing Limited from February 2002 to August 2009; Chairman of DBS Bank Ltd. from January 2006 to April 2010; Chairman of Singapore Airlines from July 2001 to December 2005 and Chairman of Singapore Telecom from April 1992 to August 2001. Mr. Koh spent fourteen years with Hewlett-Packard Company in its Asia Pacific region.

Qualifications

Mr. Koh possesses a strong mix of leadership and operational experience from his various senior positions with Sunningdale Tech, AAC Technologies, MediaRing Limited, DBS Bank, Singapore Airlines and Singapore Telecom. In addition, Mr. Koh has deep experience in the Asia Pacific region and brings that knowledge and perspective to the Board. Mr. Koh has extensive experience with our company and its predecessor, Hewlett-Packard, having served on our board for over 10 years and having spent 14 years with Hewlett-Packard.

MICHAEL R. MCMULLEN

Age: 56
Director Since: March 2015

Board Committees:

Other Public Directorships:

Executive

None

Former Public Directorships Held During the Past Five Years:

None

Mr. McMullen has served as our Chief Executive Officer since March 2015 and as President since September 2014. From September 2014 to March 2015 he also served as our Chief Operating Officer. From September 2009 to September 2014 he served as Senior Vice President, Agilent and President, Chemical Analysis Group. From January 2002 to September 2009, he served as our Vice President and General Manager of the Chemical Analysis Solutions Unit of the Life Sciences and Chemical Analysis Group. Prior to assuming this position, from March 1999 to December 2001, Mr. McMullen served as Country Manager for our China, Japan and Korea Life Sciences and Chemical Analysis Group. Prior to this position, Mr. McMullen served as the Controller for the Hewlett-Packard Company and Yokogawa Electric Joint Venture from July 1996 to March 1999.

Qualifications

Mr. McMullen has broad and deep experience with the company and its businesses having been an employee of the company and its predecessor, Hewlett-Packard, for over 20 years. During the course of his career, he has developed considerable expertise in, and in-depth knowledge of, our businesses from the perspective of an individual contributor and at numerous levels of management. This perspective gives valuable insight to our board.

DANIEL K. PODOLSKY, M.D.

Age: 64
Director Since: July 2015

Board Committees:

Other Public Directorships:

Audit and Finance

Nominating/Corporate Governance

None

Former Public Directorships Held During the Past Five Years:

GlaxoSmithKline PLC

Dr. Podolsky has served as President of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, a leading academic medical center, patient care provider and research institution, since September 2008. Previously Dr. Podolsky also served concurrently as Mallinckrodt Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and the Chief of Gastroenterology at Massachusetts General Hospital. From 2005 to 2008, Dr. Podolsky served as Chief Academic Officer and Faculty Dean, Academic Programs of Partners Healthcare System, Inc., a non-profit health care system committed to patient care, research, teaching and service. Dr. Podolsky holds the Philip O’Bryan Montgomery, Jr., M.D. Distinguished Presidential Chair in Academic Administration, and the Doris and Bryan Wildenthal Distinguished Chair in Medical Science. He is a member of the National Academy of Medicine of the US National Academy of Sciences, member of the Board of the Southwestern Medical Foundation and is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Antibe Therapeutics, Inc., a company focused on the treatment of diseases characterized by inflammation, pain and/or vascular dysfunction. Dr. Podolsky is also a member of the National Academies of Sciences Board on Army Science and Technology.

6


PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Qualifications

Dr. Podolsky’s current responsibilities in leading a large academic medical center give him relevant insight into healthcare delivery and bring scientific expertise to the Board.

Vote Required

Under our majority voting standard, in uncontested elections of directors, such as this election, each director must be elected by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote. A “majority of the votes cast” means that the number of votes cast “FOR” a director must exceed 50% of the votes cast with respect to that director. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not count as a vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” a nominee’s election and thus will have no effect in determining whether a director nominee has received a majority of the votes cast.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election to the Board of each of the
foregoing nominees.

The directors whose terms are not expiring this year and who will continue to serve as a director are listed below. They will continue to serve as directors for the remainder of their terms or such other date, in accordance with our Bylaws. Information regarding each of such directors is provided below as of December 31, 2017.

Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2019

HANS E. BISHOP

Age: 53
Director Since: July 2017

Board Committees:

Other Public Directorships:

Compensation

Nominating/Corporate Governance

Juno Therapeutics, Inc.

Former Public Directorships Held During the Past Five Years:

Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Mr. Bishop has served as president, chief executive officer and a member of the Board of Directors of Juno Therapeutics, Inc. since September 2013.  From February 2012 until October 2012, Mr. Bishop was the chief operating officer of Photothera Inc., a late-stage medical device company owned by Warburg Pincus, and he continued working with Warburg Pincus as an Executive in Residence until October 2013. Prior to joining Photothera Inc., Mr. Bishop served as executive vice president and chief operating officer at Dendreon Corporation, a publicly-traded biopharmaceutical company, from January 2010 to September 2011. Mr. Bishop has also served as the president of the specialty medicine business at Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. from December 2006 to January 2010, where he was responsible for a diverse portfolio of neurology, oncology and hematology products.

Qualifications

Mr. Bishop brings a valuable set of skills to our Board through his broad experience as an operating officer within the pharmaceutical industry and executive experience in the biotechnology industry.

PAUL N. CLARK

Age: 70
Director Since: May 2006

Board Committees:

Other Public Directorships:

Audit and Finance (Chair)

Nominating/Corporate Governance

Keysight Technologies, Inc.

Former Public Directorships Held During the Past Five Years:

Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

      Talecris Biotherapeutics Holdings Corp

Biolase, Inc.


Mr. Clark has beenwas a Strategic Advisory Board member of Genstar Capital, LLC sincefrom August 2007 to December 2016 and was an Operating Partner from August 2007 to January 2013.  Genstar Capital LLC is a middle market private equity firm that focuses on investments in selected segments of life sciences and healthcare services, industrial technology, business services and software.

7


PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Prior to that, Mr. Clark was the Chief Executive Officer and President of ICOS Corporation, a biotherapeutics company, from June 1999 to January 2007, and the Chairman of the Board of Directors of ICOS from February 2000 to January 2007. From 1984 to December 1998, Mr. Clark worked in various capacities for Abbott Laboratories, a health care products manufacturer, retiring from Abbott Laboratories as Executive Vice President and a board member. His previous experience included senior positions with Marion Laboratories, a pharmaceutical company, and Sandoz Pharmaceuticals (now Novartis Corporation), a pharmaceutical company.

Qualifications

Mr. Clark has significant experience in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, including his experience serving in senior management positions with ICOS Corporation, (where he served as Chief Executive Officer and President), Abbott Laboratories, Marion Laboratories and Sandoz Pharmaceuticals.  In addition, Mr. Clark brings considerable public company director experience as well as his extensive experience within our industry and perspective on company managementexpertise in business finance.  Mr. Clark is the chairperson of our Audit and governance issuesFinance Committee and practices.is qualified as a financial expert under SEC guidelines.



Table of Contents

TADATAKA YAMADA, M.D.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


Age:JAMES G. CULLEN 72
Director Since: January 2011

Board Committees:

Other��Public Directorships:

Age:73
Director Since:
April 2000

Agilent Committees:

Compensation (Chair)

Nominating/Corporate Governance
(Chair)

Executive (Chair)

Public Directorships:

Avinger, Inc.
Keysight Technologies, Inc
Neustar, Inc.
Prudential Financial, Inc.

CSL Limited

Former Public Directorships Held During the Past Five Years:

Johnson & Johnson

Mr. Cullen has served as Non-Executive Chairman of our Board since March 2005. Mr. Cullen was President and Chief Operating Officer of Bell Atlantic Corporation (now known as Verizon) from 1997 to June 2000 and a member of the office of chairman from 1993 to June 2000. Prior to this appointment, Mr. Cullen was the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Telecom Group of Bell Atlantic from 1995 to 1997. Prior to the creation of Bell Atlantic on January 1, 1984, Mr. Cullen held management positions with New Jersey Bell from 1966 to 1981 and AT&T from 1981 to 1983.

Mr. Cullen has considerable managerial and operational experience and expertise from his senior leadership position with Bell Atlantic and its predecessors. In addition, Mr. Cullen brings significant public company director experience and perspective on public company management and governance. Mr. Cullen has a strong understanding of Agilent having served on the board for over 10 years, including more than 5 years as the non-executive chairman.

TADATAKA YAMADA, M.D.
Age:70
Director Since:
January 2011

Agilent Committees:
Compensation
Nominating/Corporate Governance

Public Directorships:
None

Former Public Directorships Held During the Past Five Years:
Covidien plc.

Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.

Dr. Yamada is currently a Venture Partner on the Life Sciences team of Frazier Healthcare Partners, a healthcare-focused investment firm. From June 2011 to June 2015, Dr. Yamada served as the Chief Medical and Scientific Officer of Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., a research-based global pharmaceutical company. Dr. Yamada previously served as President of the Global Health Program of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation from June 2006 to June 2011. From 2000 to 2006, Dr. Yamada was Chairman of Research and Development for GlaxoSmithKline Inc. and prior to that, he held research and development positions at SmithKline Beecham. Prior to joining SmithKline Beecham, Dr. Yamada was Chairman of the Department of Internal Medicine at the University of Michigan Medical School and Physician-in-Chief of the University of Michigan Medical Center.

Qualifications

Dr. Yamada brings a unique perspective to our Board a unique perspective with his experience as the former President of the Global Health Program of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as well as his significant research and development experience. Dr. Yamada’s extensive pharmaceutical industry knowledge gives him ana unique insight into a number of issues facing Agilent that other directors might not possess.we face.

Agilent’s Board recommends a vote FOR the election to the Board of each of the
foregoing nominees.



Table of Contents

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Continuing Directors Not Being Considered for Election at this Annual Meeting

The Agilent directors whose terms are not expiring this year are listed below. They will continue to serve as directors for the remainder of their terms or such other date, in accordance with Agilent’s Bylaws. Information regarding each of such directors is provided below.

Directors Whose Terms Will Expire in 20172020

HEIDI FIELDS

HEIDI KUNZ

Age:Age:61
63
Director Since:
February 2000

Board Committees:

Other Public Directorships:

Agilent Committees:

Audit and Finance (Chair)

Compensation

Nominating/Corporate Governance

Public Directorships:

Financial Engines, Inc.

Halyard Health, Inc.

Former Public Directorships Held During the Past Five Years:

None

Ms. FieldsKunz served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Blue Shield of California from September 2003 through December 2012. She served2012 and as Executive Vice President and the Chief Financial Officer of Gap, Inc. from 1999 to January 2003. Prior to assuming that position,thereto, Ms. FieldsKunz served as the Chief Financial Officer of ITT Industries, Inc. from 1995 to 1999. From 1979 to 1995, she held senior financial management positions at General Motors Corporation, including Vice President and Treasurer.

8


PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Qualifications

Ms. FieldsKunz possesses significant experience and experience in management and financial matters, having served as the Chief Financial Officer of both public and private companies, including at Blue Shield of California, Gap, Inc. and ITT Industries, Inc.companies. Ms. Fields isKunz previously served as the chairperson of our Audit and Finance Committee and iswas qualified as a financial expert under SEC guidelines. In addition, Ms. FieldsKunz has considerable experience and expertise with Agilentour company having been a member of Agilent’s board of directorsour Board for over 10 years.

SUE H. RATAJ

Age: 60
Director Since: September 2015

Board Committees:

Other Public Directorships:

Age:58
Director Since:
September 2015

Agilent Committees:
Compensation

Audit and Finance

Nominating/Corporate Governance

Public Directorships:

Cabot Corporation

Bayer A.G.

Former Public Directorships Held During the Past Five Years:

None

Bayer A.G.

Ms. Rataj was Chief Executive, Petrochemicals for BP, a global energy company, until she retired in April 2011. In this role, she held responsibility for all of BP’s global petrochemical operations. Prior to that,thereto, Ms. Rataj held a variety of senior management positions with BP, most recently serving as Group Vice President, Health, Safety, Operations and Technology for the Refining and Marketing Segment.

Qualifications

Ms. Rataj possesses significant leadership experience and business expertise from her executive positions with BP. Ms. Rataj has lived and worked extensively in the Asia Pacific and European regions and brings a global perspective to the Agilentour Board. In addition, Ms. Rataj brings public company director experience and knowledge of public company management and governance practices.



Table of Contents

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


GEORGE A. SCANGOS, Ph.D.PhD

Age: 69
Director Since: September 2014

Board Committees:

Other Public Directorships:

Age:67
Director Since:
September 2014

Agilent Committees:

Compensation

Nominating/Corporate Governance

Public Directorships:

Biogen Inc.

Exelixis, Inc.

Former Public Directorships Held During the Past Five Years:

Anadys Pharmaceuticals,Biogen Inc.

Dr. Scangos has served as Chief Executive Officer and a director of Vir Biotechnology, Inc. since January 2017.  From July 2010 to January 2017, Dr. Scangos served as the Chief Executive Officer and a director of Biogen Inc. since July 2010., a biopharmaceutical company. From 1996 to July 2010, Dr. Scangos served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Exelixis, Inc., a drug discovery and development company. From 1993 to 1996, Dr. Scangos served as President of Bayer Biotechnology, where he was responsible for research, business development, process development, manufacturing, engineering and quality assurance of Bayer’s biological products. Before joining Bayer in 1987, Dr. Scangos was a Professor of Biology at Johns Hopkins University for six years.  Dr. Scangos served as non-executive Chairman of Anadys Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, from 2005 to July 2010 and was a director of the company from 2003 to July 2010. Dr. Scangos served as the Chair of the California Healthcare Institute in 2010 and was a member of the Board of the Global Alliance for TB Drug Development from 2006 until 2010. He is also a member of the National Board of Visitors of the University of California, Davis School of Medicine and is currently an Adjunct Professor of Biology at Johns Hopkins University.

Qualifications

Dr. Scangos has extensive training as a scientist, significant knowledge and experience with respect to the biotechnology, healthcare and pharmaceutical industries, and a comprehensive leadership background resulting from service on various boards of directors and as an executive in the pharmaceutical industry.

Directors Whose Terms will Expire in 2018

9


ROBERT J. HERBOLD
Age: 73
Director Since:
June 2000
Agilent Committees:
Audit and Finance
Nominating/Corporate Governance
Public Directorships:
Neptune Orient Lines Limited
Former Public Directorships Held During the Past Five Years:
None

Mr. Herbold has served as the Managing Director of the consulting firm The Herbold Group, LLC since 2003. He served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Microsoft Corporation from 1994 to April 2001 and served as an Executive Vice President (part-time) of Microsoft Corporation until June 2003. Prior to joining Microsoft, Mr. Herbold was employed by The Procter & Gamble Company for twenty-six years, and served as a Senior Vice President at The Procter & Gamble Company from 1990 to 1994.

Mr. Herbold possesses significant leadership experience and business expertise from his executive leadership positions with Microsoft Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company. Having been a member of the Agilent board for over 10 years, Mr. Herbold has a strong knowledge of Agilent’s business. In addition, Mr. Herbold brings considerable public and private company director experience and perspective on public company management and governance issues and practices.



Table of Contents

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


KOH BOON HWEE
Age:65
Director Since:
May 2003
Agilent Committees:
Compensation (Chair)
Nominating/Corporate Governance
Public Directorships:
AAC Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Sunningdale Tech, Ltd.
Yeo Hiap Seng Ltd.
Far East Orchard Ltd.
Former Public Directorships Held During the Past Five Years:
Yeo Hiap Seng (Malaysia) Bhd

Mr. Koh is the managing partner of Credence Capital Fund II (Cayman) Ltd., a private equity fund. Mr. Koh has served as the non-Executive Chairman of Sunningdale Tech Ltd. since January 2009 and previously served as its Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from July 2005 to January 2009. He has served as the non-Executive Chairman of Yeo Hiap Seng Ltd. since April 2010, the non-Executive Chairman of Rippledot Capital Advisers Pte. Ltd. since February 2011 and the non-Executive Chairman of Far East Orchard Ltd. since April 2013. He served as Executive Director of MediaRing Limited from February 2002 to August 2009; Chairman of DBS Bank Ltd. from January 2006 to April 2010; Chairman of Singapore Airlines from July 2001 to December 2005 and Chairman of Singapore Telecom from April 1992 to August 2001. Mr. Koh spent fourteen years with Hewlett-Packard Company in its Asia Pacific region.

Mr. Koh possesses a strong mix of leadership and operational experience from his various senior positions with Sunningdale Tech, AAC Technologies, MediaRing Limited, DBS Bank, Singapore Airlines and Singapore Telecom. In addition, Mr. Koh has deep experience in the Asia Pacific region and brings that knowledge and perspective to the Board. Mr. Koh has extensive experience with Agilent and its predecessor, Hewlett-Packard, having served on the Agilent board for over 10 years and having spent 14 years with Hewlett-Packard.

MICHAEL R. MCMULLEN
Age:54
Director Since:
March 2015
Agilent Committees:
Executive Committee
Public Directorships:
None

Former Public Directorships Held During the Past Five Years:
None

Mr. McMullen has served as Chief Executive Officer since March 2015 and as President since September 2014. From September 2014 to March 2015 he also served as Chief Operating Officer. From September 2009 to September 2014 he served as Senior Vice President, Agilent and President, Chemical Analysis Group. From January 2002 to September 2009, he served as our Vice President and General Manager of the Chemical Analysis Solutions Unit of the Life Sciences and Chemical Analysis Group. Prior to assuming this position, from March 1999 to December 2001, Mr. McMullen served as Country Manager for Agilent’s China, Japan and Korea Life Sciences and Chemical Analysis Group. Prior to this position, Mr. McMullen served as our Controller for the Hewlett-Packard Company and Yokogawa Electric Joint Venture from July 1996 to March 1999.

Mr. McMullen has broad and deep experience with Agilent and its businesses having been an employee of Agilent and its predecessor, Hewlett-Packard, for over 20 years. During the course of his career, he has developed considerable expertise in, and in-depth knowledge of, Agilent’s businesses, having seen them as an individual contributor and at numerous levels of management. This perspective gives valuable insight to the Agilent board.



Table of Contents

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


DANIEL K. PODOLSKY, M.D.
Age:62
Director Since:
July 2015
Agilent Committees:
Audit and Finance
Nominating/Corporate Governance
Public Directorships:
GlaxoSmithKline PLC
Former Public Directorships Held During the Past Five Years:
None

Dr. Podolsky has served as President of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, a leading academic medical center, patient care provider and research institution, since September 2008. Previously Dr. Podolsky also served concurrently as Mallinckrodt Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, the Chief of Gastroenterology at Massachusetts General Hospital. From 2005 to 2008, Dr. Podolsky served as Chief Academic Officer and Faculty Dean, Academic Programs of Partners Healthcare System, Inc., a non-profit health care system committed to patient care, research, teaching and service. Dr. Podolsky holds the Philip O’Bryan Montgomery, Jr., M.D. Distinguished Presidential Chair in Academic Administration, and the Doris and Bryan Wildenthal Distinguished Chair in Medical Science. He is a member of the Institute of Medicine of the US National Academy of Sciences, member of the Board of the Southwestern Medical Foundation and is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Antibe Therapeutics, Inc., a company focused on the treatment of diseases characterized by inflammation, pain and/or vascular dysfunction. Dr. Podolsky is also a member of the National Academies of Sciences Board on Army Science and Technology.

Dr. Podolsky’s current responsibilities in leading a large academic medical center give him relevant insight into healthcare delivery and bring scientific expertise to the Board.



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS


COMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEENON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

Directors who are employed by Agilentus do not receive any compensation for their Board services. As a result, Mr. McMullen, an employee of Agilent,our Chief Executive Officer, received no additional compensation for his Board services.services as a director. The general policy of the Board is that compensation for non-employee directors should be a mix of cash and equity-based compensation that is competitive with the compensation paid to non-employee directors within Agilent’sour peer group. The non-employee director’s compensation plan year begins on March 1 of each year (the “Plan Year”).

The table below sets forth the annual retainer, equity grants and committee premiums for the non-employee directors and the Non-Executive Chairman for the 20152017 Plan Year:

Summary of Non-Employee Director Annual Compensation for the 20152017 Plan Year

Committee ChairAudit Committee
Cash Retainer(1)Equity Grant(2)Premium(3)Member Premium(4)
Non-employee director$90,000Stock Grant with a value
equivalent to $180,000
$15,000 - Audit and Finance
Committee and Nominating/
Corporate Governance
Committee Chair
$20,000 - Compensation
Committee Chair
$10,000
Non-Executive
Chairman
$245,000Stock Grant with a value
equivalent to $180,000
Not eligible$10,000

(1)

The following table sets forth the compensation that we provide to non-employee directors.  Each non-employee director may elect to defer all or part of the cash compensation to the 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (“Director Deferral Plan”). Any deferred cash compensation is converted into shares of our common stock.

Board Compensation Elements

 

 

 

Member (1)

 

Chair (2)

 

Board Cash Retainer

 

$100,000

 

$155,000

 

Audit and Finance Committee Retainer

 

$10,000

 

$25,000

 

Compensation Committee Retainer

 

None

 

$20,000

 

Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee Retainer

 

None

 

$15,000

 

Annual Stock Grant (3)

 

$200,000 value

 

 

 

 

 

 

____________________________

(1)

Non-employee directors who serve as a member of the Audit and Finance Committee (excluding the Audit and Finance Committee Chair) receive an additional $10,000 retainer which is payable in cash compensation toat the 2005 Deferred Compensationbeginning of each Plan for Non-Employee Directors. Any deferredYear.

(2)

Non-employee directors (excluding the Non-Executive Chairman) who serve as the chairperson of the Board or a Board committee receive an additional retainer which is payable in cash compensation is converted into sharesat the beginning of Agilent common stock.each Plan Year.  

(3)

(2)

The stock will be granted on the later of (i) March 1 or (ii) the first trading day after each Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The number of shares underlying the stock grant is determined by dividing $180,000$200,000 by the average fair market value of Agilent’sour common stock over 20 consecutive trading days up to and including the day prior to the grant date. The stock grant vests immediately upon grant. Voluntary deferral is available as an option forgrant and may be deferred pursuant to the non-employee directors.

(3)Non-employee directors (excluding the Non-Executive Chairman) who serve as the chairperson of a Board committee receive a “committee chair premium.” The chair of the Audit Committee and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee receive a premium of $15,000 and the chair of the Compensation Committee receives a premium of $20,000, payable in cash, at the beginning of each Plan Year.
(4)Non-employee directors (including the Non-Executive Chairman) who serve as a member of the Audit and Finance Committee receive an additional $10,000 in cash, paid at the beginning of each Plan Year.Director Deferral Plan.  

A non-employee director who joins the Board of Directors after the start of the Plan Year will have his or her cash retainer, equity grant and committee chair premium pro-rated based upon the remaining days in the Plan Year that the director will serve.

In September 2015,2017, the Compensation Committee and the Board, based on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, F.W. Cook,Semler Brossy Consulting Group LLC (“Semler Brossy”), concluded that the current non-employee director compensation is competitive with Agilent’s peer group and would remain unchanged for the 20162018 Plan Year, except that the annual Committee Chair Premium for the chair of the Compensation Committee was increased from $15,000 to $20,000, effective September 2015.Year.  

10




Table of Contents

COMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS


Non-Employee Director CompensationCompensation for Fiscal Year 20152017

The table below sets forth information regarding the compensation earned by each of Agilent’sour non-employee directors during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015:2017:

Non-Employee Director Compensation for Fiscal Year 2015
CashCommitteeAudit CommitteeStock
RetainerChair PremiumMember PremiumAwardsTotal
Name($)(1)($)(1)($)(1)($)(2)(3)($)
Paul N. Clark$90,000$—$10,000$181,967$281,967
James G. Cullen(4)$245,000$—$—$181,967$426,967
Heidi Fields$90,000$15,000$10,000$181,967$296,967
Robert J. Herbold$90,000$—$10,000$181,967$281,967
Koh Boon Hwee$90,000$15,000$—$181,967$286,967
Daniel K. Podolsky, M.D.(5)$36,720$—$6,120$110,005$152,845
A. Barry Rand(6)$90,000$—$—$181,967$271,967
Sue H. Rataj(7)$20,656$—$—$82,784$103,440
George A. Scangos, Ph.D.$90,000$—$—$181,967$271,967
Tadataka Yamada, M.D.$90,000$—$—$181,967$271,967

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

Non-Executive

Committee

Audit Committee

Stock

 

 

 

 

Retainer (1)

Chair Retainer (1)

Chair Retainer (1)

Member Retainer (1)

Awards (2)(3)

Total

 

 

Name

($)

($)

($)

($)

($)

($)

 

 

Hans E. Bishop (4)

65,934

 

-

-

134,600

200,534

 

 

Paul N. Clark

96,667

 

25,000

-

205,091

326,758

 

 

James G. Cullen (5)

96,667

51,668

-

-

205,091

353,426

 

 

Robert J. Herbold

96,667

 

-

10,000

205,091

311,758

 

 

Koh Boon Hwee (6)

96,667

103,334

-

-

205,091

405,092

 

 

Heidi Kunz

96,667

 

-

-

205,091

301,758

 

 

Daniel K. Podolsky, M.D.

96,667

 

-

10,000

205,091

311,758

 

 

Sue H. Rataj

96,667

 

-

10,000

205,091

311,758

 

 

George A. Scangos, PhD

96,667

 

-

-

205,091

301,758

 

 

Tadataka Yamada, M.D.

96,667

 

20,000

-

205,091

321,758

 

___________________

(1)

Reflects all cash compensation earned during fiscal year 2015, whether or not any of the cash compensation was2017, including amounts deferred into Agilent common stock pursuant to the 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors.Director Deferral Plan. Dr. Podolsky and Dr. Yamada elected to defer 50% and 100%, respectively, of all cash fees earned in fiscal year 2017 to the Director Deferral Plan.  The number of shares of Agilentour common stock received in lieu of cash pursuant to the Director Deferral Plan is determined by dividing the dollar value of the deferred cash amount by the twenty (20) day average fair market value for the applicable deferral date. The aggregate number of shares of Agilent common stock deferred by each non-employee director is set forth in the footnotes to the Beneficial Ownership Table included in this proxy statement.

(2)

Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value for stock awards granted in fiscal year 20152017 calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. TheFor more information regarding our application of FASB ASC Topic 718, including the assumptions used byin the Company in calculatingcalculations of these amounts, are included inplease refer to Note 4 under the heading “Valuation Assumptions” of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company’s 2015our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(3)A supplemental table following these footnotes sets forth: (i)  The dollar values of the aggregate number of stock awards represent stock grants of 3,866 shares for each non-employee director, excluding Mr. Bishop, who received a pro-rated stock grant of 2,199 shares.  

(3)

Stock awards granted to non-employee directors vest immediately upon grant.  Therefore, there were no stock awards outstanding at fiscal year-end.  Directors Herbold, Koh and Kunz each had an aggregate of 15,482 option awards outstanding at fiscal year-end; (ii)year-end.  

(4)

Mr. Bishop joined the aggregate numberboard on July 18, 2017 and his cash retainer and equity grant were pro-rated.  

(5)

Mr. Cullen served as the Non-Executive Chairman of stock awards granted during fiscal year 2015; and (iii) the grant date fair market value of equity awards granted by Agilent during fiscal year 2015Board from March 1, 2005 to each of our non-employee directors.March 15, 2017.

(4)

(6)

Mr. CullenKoh has served as the Non-Executive Chairman of the Board since March 1, 2005.

(5)Dr. Podolsky joined the Board on July 21, 2015.
(6)Mr. Rand retired from the Board on October 31, 2015.
(7)Ms. Rataj joined the Board on September 15, 2015.



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS2017.


Additional Information With Respect to Director Equity Awards

The following table provides additional information on the outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end and awards granted during fiscal year 2015 for non-employee directors.

Grant Date Fair
Stock AwardsOption AwardsStock AwardsValue of Stock
Outstanding atOutstanding atGranted DuringAwards Granted in
Fiscal Year-EndFiscal Year-EndFiscal Year 2015Fiscal Year 2015
Name(#)(1)(#)(#)(#) (1)(2)
Paul N. Clark4,311$181,967
James G. Cullen32,1794,311$181,967
Heidi Fields41,0494,311$181,967
Robert J. Herbold32,1794,311$181,967
Koh Boon Hwee32,1794,311$181,967
Daniel K. Podolsky, M.D.(3)2,780$110,005
A. Barry Rand(4)32,1794,311$181,967
Sue H. Rataj(5)2,290$82,784
George A. Scangos, Ph.D.4,311$181,967
Tadataka Yamada, M.D.4,311$181,967

(1)Stock awards granted to non-employee directors vest immediately upon grant.
(2)Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value for stock awards granted in fiscal year 2015 calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used by the Company in calculating these amounts are included in Note 4 under the heading “Valuation Assumptions” of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(3)Dr. Podolsky joined the Board on July 21, 2015.
(4)Mr. Rand retired from the Board on October 31, 2015.
(5)Ms. Rataj joined the Board on September 15, 2015.

Non-Employee Director Reimbursement Practice for Fiscal Year 2015

Non-employee directors are reimbursed for travel and other out-of-pocket expenses connected to Board travel.incurred in connection with their service on our Board.

Non-Employee Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

In 2005, the company adopted a policy that requires each non-employee directorNon-employee directors are required to own Agilent shares having a value of at least three times the annual cash retainer. In May 2010, the Compensation Committee, based on the recommendation of the Committee’s independent compensation consultant, F.W. Cook, amended the guidelines to increase the alignment of the non-employee directors’ interest with stockholder interests by requiring each non-employee director to own Agilent sharesour common stock having a value of at least six times an amount equal to $90,000 (for the 2014 Plan Year).annual cash retainer. The shares counted toward the ownership guidelines include shares owned outright and the shares of Agilentour common stock in the non-employee director’s deferred compensation account. For recently appointed non-employee directors, these ownership levels must be attained within five years from the date of their initial election or appointment to the board of directors. As of September 2015, allAll of our incumbent non-employee directors hadhave either achieved the recommended ownership level except for: (1) Dr. Yamada who was appointedor are expected to achieve the Board in January 2011 and has until January 2016recommended ownership level within five years of their initial election or appointment to meet the ownership requirements (2) Dr. Scangos who was appointed to the Board in September 2014 and has until September 2019 (3) Dr. Podolsky who was appointed to the Board in March 2015 and has until March 2020 to meet the ownership requirements, and (4) Ms. Rataj who was appointed to the Board in September 2015 and has until September 2020 to meet the ownership requirements.our Board.

11




Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


Corporate Governance MattersCORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Agilent hasWe have had formal corporate governance standards in place since the Company’sour inception in 1999. We have reviewed internally and with the Board the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), the rules of the SEC and the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards regarding corporate governance policies and processes and are in compliance with the rules and listing standards.

We have adopted charters for our Compensation Committee, Audit and Finance Committee, Compensation Committee, Executive Committee and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and Executive Committee consistent with the applicable rules and standards. Our committee charters, Amended and Restated Corporate Governance Standards and Standards of Business Conduct are located in the Investor Relations section of our website and can be accessed by clicking on “Governance Policies” in the “Corporate Governance” section of our web page at www.investor.agilent.com.

Board Leadership Structure

AgilentWe currently separatesseparate the positions of chief executive officer and chairman of the Board.  Since March 2005, Mr. Cullen one of our independent directors, has served as our chairman of the Board.Board from March 2005 to March 2017.  Mr. Koh was appointed chairman of the Board in March 2017.  The responsibilities of the chairman of the Board include: setting the agenda for each Board meeting, in consultation with the chief executive officer; chairing the meetings of independent directors; and facilitating and conducting, with the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, the annual self-assessments by the Board and each standing committee of the Board, including periodic performance reviews of individual directors. Separating the positions of chief executive officer and chairman of the Board allows our chief executive officer to focus on our day-to-day business, while allowing the chairman of the Board to lead the Board in its fundamental role of providing advice to and independent oversight of management. The Board believes that having an independent director serve as chairman of the Board is the appropriate leadership structure for Agilentthe company at this time.

However, our Corporate Governance Standards permit the roles of the chairperson of the Board and the chief executive officer to be filled by the same or different individuals. This provides the Board with flexibility to determine whether the two roles should be combined in the future based on Agilent’sour needs and the Board’s assessment of Agilent’sour leadership from time to time. Our Corporate Governance Standards provide that, in the event that the chairperson of the Board is also the chief executive officer, the Board may consider the election of an independent Board member as a lead independent director.

In 2014, we amended the Corporate Governance Standards to raise the mandatory retirement age for directors from 72 to 75.

The Board made the change in recognition of the contribution that experienced directors, with knowledge of the Company,company, bring to effective board oversight.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board executes its risk management responsibility directly and through its committees.  The full Board is kept abreast of risk oversight and other activities of its committees through reports of the committee chairpersons to the full Board during Board meetings.  The Audit and Finance Committee has primary responsibility for overseeing Agilent’sour enterprise risk management process. The Audit and Finance Committee receives updates and discusses individual and overall risk areas during its meetings, including the Company’sour financial risk assessments, risk management policies and major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures.

The Compensation Committee oversees risks associated with our compensation policies and practices with respect to both executive compensation and compensation generally.

The Compensation Committee receives reports and discusses whether Agilent’sour compensation policies and practices create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.company.

The full Board is kept abreast of its committees’ risk oversight and other activities via reports of the committee chairpersons to the full Board during Board meetings.





Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


Majority Voting for Directors

Our Bylaws provide for majority voting of directors regarding director elections. In an uncontested election, any nominee for director shall be elected by the vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to the director. A “majority of the votes cast” means that the number of shares voted “FOR” a director must exceed 50% of the votes cast with respect to that director. The “votes cast” shall include votes to withhold authority and exclude votes to “ABSTAIN” with respect to that director’s election. If a director is not elected due to a failure to receive a majority of the votes cast and his or her successor is not otherwise elected and qualified, the director shall promptly tender his or her resignation following certification of the stockholder vote.

12


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will consider the resignation offer and recommend to the Board whether to accept or reject it, or whether other action should be taken. The Board will act on the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation within 90 days following certification of the stockholder vote. Thereafter, the Board will promptly disclose their decision and the rationale behind it in a press release to be disseminated in the same manner as Companycompany press releases typically are distributed.

Any director who tenders his or her resignation pursuant to this provision shall not participate in the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee recommendation or Board action regarding whether to accept the resignation offer.

Board Communications

Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with the Board and Agilent’sour Non-Executive Chairperson of the Board of Directors by filling out the form at “Contact Chairman” under “Corporate Governance” at www.investor.agilent.com or by writing to James G. Cullen,Koh Boon Hwee, c/o Agilent Technologies, Inc., General Counsel, 5301 Stevens Creek Blvd., MS 1A-11, Santa Clara, California 95051. The General Counsel will perform a legal review

in the normal discharge of duties to ensure that communications forwarded to the Non-Executive Chairperson preserve the integrity of the process. For example, items that are unrelated to the duties and responsibilities of the Board such as spam, junk mail and mass mailings, product complaints, personal employee complaints, product inquiries, new product suggestions, resumes and other forms of job inquiries, surveys, business solicitations or advertisements (the “Unrelated Items”) will not be forwarded to the Non-Executive Chairperson. In addition, material that is unduly hostile, threatening, illegal or similarly unsuitable will not be forwarded to the Non-Executive Chairperson.

Any communication that is relevant to the conduct of Agilent’sour business and is not forwarded will be retained for one year (other than Unrelated Items) and made available to the Non-Executive Chairperson and any other independent director on request. The independent directors grant the General Counsel discretion to decide what correspondence shall be shared with Agilentour management and specifically instruct that any personal employee complaints be forwarded to Agilent’sour Human Resources Department.

Director Stockholder Meeting Attendance

We encourage, but do not require, our Board members to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. Last year, all of our directors who were serving at such time, attended the annual meeting of stockholders.

Director Independence

AgilentWe have adopted the following standards for director independence in compliance with the NYSE corporate governance listing standards:

1. No director qualifies as “independent” unless the Board affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with Agilent or any of its subsidiaries (either directly, or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with Agilent). Agilent or any of its subsidiaries must identify which directorsstandards.  These independence standards are independent and disclose the basis for that determination.

In addition, a director is not independent if:

2. The director is, or has been within the last three years, an employee of Agilent or any of its subsidiaries, or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, an executive officer of Agilent or any of its subsidiaries.





Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


3. The director has received, or has an immediate family member who has received, during any twelvemonth period within the last three years, more than $120,000set forth in direct compensation from Agilent or any of its subsidiaries, other than director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service).

4. (A) The director is a current partner or employee of a firm that is Agilent’s internal or external auditor; (B) the director has an immediate family member who is a current partner of such a firm; (C) the director has an immediate family member who is a current employee of such a firm and personally works on Agilent’s audit; or (D) the director or an immediate family member was within the last three years a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on Agilent’s or any of its subsidiaries’ audit within that time.

5. The director or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, employed as an executive officer of another company where any of Agilent’s or any of its subsidiaries’ current executive officers at the same time serves or served on that company’s compensation committee.

6. The director is a current employee, or an immediate family member is a current executive officer, of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, Agilent or any of its subsidiaries for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million, or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues.

our Corporate Governance Standards.  The Board has affirmatively determined that Paul N. Clark, James G. Cullen, Heidi Fields, Robert J. Herbold, Koh Boon Hwee, Daniel K. Podolsky, M.D., Sue H. Rataj, George A. Scangos, Ph.D., and Tadataka Yamada, M.D. metall of our directors meet these independence standards with the aforementioned independence standards.exception of Michael R. McMullen did not meet the independence standards because he is Agilent’sof his role as our President and Chief Executive Officer.

Agilent’sOur non-employee directors meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management.  As theThe Non-Executive Chairman of the Board James G. Cullen was chosen to presidepresides at executive sessions of the non-management directors.

Compensation Committee Member Independence

Agilent hasWe have adopted standards for compensation committee member independence in compliance with the NYSE corporate governance listing standards. In affirmatively determining the independence of any director who will serve on the compensation committee, the board of directors considers all factors specifically relevant to determining whether such director has a relationship to Agilentthe company or any of its subsidiaries which is material to such director’s ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties of a compensation committee member, including, but not limited to:

(A) 

the source of compensation of such director, including any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee paid by Agilentthe company to such director; and

(B)

whether such director is affiliated with Agilent, a subsidiary of Agilentthe company, or an affiliate of a subsidiary of Agilent.the company.



13




Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORSDirector Nomination Criteria:

The Board has four standing committees as set forth in the table below. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of BoardQualifications and applicable committee meetings held when the director was serving on the Board.

Nominating/
Audit andCorporate
DirectorBoardFinanceCompensationGovernanceExecutive
Paul N. Clark
James G. CullenCHAIRCHAIRCHAIR
Heidi FieldsCHAIR
Robert J. Herbold 
Koh Boon Hwee CHAIR
Michael R. McMullen
Daniel K. Podolsky, M.D.(1)
Sue H. Rataj(2)
George A. Scangos, Ph.D.
Tadataka Yamada, M.D.
No. of Meetings in FY20151212760

(1)     Dr. Podolsky joined our Board on July 21, 2015.
(2)Ms. Rataj joined our Board on September 15, 2015.

Agilent encourages, but does not require, its Board members to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. Last year, all of our directors who were serving at such time, attended the annual meeting of stockholders.

Audit and Finance CommitteeExperience

The Audit and Finance Committee is responsible for the oversight of the quality and integrity of Agilent’s consolidated financial statements, its compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the qualifications and independence of its independent registered public accounting firm, the performance of its internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm and other significant financial matters. In discharging its duties, the Audit and Finance Committee is expected to:

have the sole authority to appoint, retain, compensate, oversee, evaluate and replace theindependent registered public accounting firm;
review and approve the scope of the annual internal and external audit;
review and pre-approve the engagement of Agilent’s independent registered public accountingfirm to perform audit and non-audit services and the related fees;
meet independently with Agilent’s internal auditing staff, independent registered publicaccounting firm and senior management;
review the adequacy and effectiveness of the system of internal control over financial reportingand any significant changes in internal control over financial reporting;
review Agilent’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures including “Management’sDiscussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Company’sreports on Form 10-K or Form 10-Q;


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


establish and oversee procedures for (a) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaintsreceived by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditingmatters, and (b) the confidential anonymous submission by employees of the Company ofconcerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters;
review funding and investment policies, implementation of funding policies and investmentperformance of Agilent’s benefit plans;
monitor compliance with Agilent’s Standards of Business Conduct; and
review disclosures from Agilent’s independent registered public accounting firm required bythe applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding theindependence of accountant’s communications with the audit committee.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee reviews the performance of Agilent’s elected officers and other key employees and determines, approves and reports to the Board on the elements of their compensation, including total cash compensation and long-term equity based incentives. In addition, the Compensation Committee:

approves and monitors Agilent’s benefit plan offerings;
supervises and oversees the administration of Agilent’s incentive compensation, variablepay and stock programs, including the impact of Agilent’s compensation programs andarrangements on Company risk;
recommends to the Board the annual retainer fee as well as other compensation for non-employee directors;
establishes comparator peer group and compensation targets based on this peer group for theCompany’s named executive officers; and
has sole authority to retain and terminate executive compensation consultants.

For more information on the responsibilities and activities of the Compensation Committee, including the committee’s processes for determining executive compensation, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation Committee Report,” “Executive Compensation” and the Compensation Committee’s charter.

The Compensation Committee also helps determine compensation for non-employee directors. The process the Compensation Committee undertakes for setting non-employee director compensation is similar to that of setting executive officer compensation. The Compensation Committee is aided by an independent consultant, currently Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“F.W. Cook”), who is selected and retained by the Compensation Committee. The role of the independent consultant is to measure and benchmark our non-employee director compensation against a certain peer group of companies with respect to appropriate compensation levels for positions comparable in the market. The independent consultant recommends appropriate retainers, committee chair retainers, grant values and stock ownership guidelines to the Compensation Committee. This information is reviewed, discussed and finalized at a Compensation Committee meeting and a recommendation is made to the full Board. The full Board makes the final determination on non-employee director compensation.



Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee proposes a slate of directors for election by Agilent’s stockholders at each annual meeting and recommends to the Board candidates to fill any vacancies on the Board. It is also responsible for reviewing management succession plans, recommending to the Board the appropriate Board size and committee structure and developing and reviewing corporate governance principles applicable to Agilent.

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended for nomination by stockholders, provided that the recommendations are made in accordance with the procedures described in the section entitled “General Information about the Meeting” located at the end of this Proxy Statement.proxy statement.  Candidates recommended for nomination by stockholders that comply with these procedures will receive the same consideration as other candidates recommended by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee.

AgilentWe typically hireshire a third partythird-party search firm to help identify and facilitate the screening and interview process of candidates for director.  To be considered by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, a director nomineecandidate must have:

a reputation for personal and professional integrity and ethics;
executive or similar policy-making experience in relevant business or technology areas ornational prominence in an academic, government or other relevant field;
breadth of experience;
soundness of judgment;
the ability to make independent, analytical inquiries;
the willingness and ability to devote the time required to perform Board activities adequately;
the ability to represent the total corporate interests of Agilent; and
the ability to represent the long-term interests of stockholders as a whole.

a reputation for personal and professional integrity and ethics;

executive or similar policy-making experience in relevant business or technology areas or national prominence in an academic, government or other relevant field;

breadth of experience;

soundness of judgment;

the ability to make independent, analytical inquiries;

the willingness and ability to devote the time required to perform Board activities adequately;

the ability to represent the total corporate interests of the company; and

the ability to represent the long-term interests of stockholders as a whole.

In addition to these minimum requirements, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will also consider whether the candidate’s skills are complementary to the existing Board members’ skills; the diversity of the Board in factors such as age, experience in technology, manufacturing, finance and marketing, international experience and culture; and the Board’s needs for specific operational, management or other expertise. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee from time to time reviews the appropriate skills and characteristics required of board members, including factors that it seeks in board members such as diversity of business experience, viewpoints and, personal background, and diversity of skills in technology, finance, marketing, international business, financial reporting and other areas that are expected to contribute to an effective Board of Directors. In evaluating potential candidates for the Board of Directors, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee considers these factors in the light of the specific needs of the Board of Directors at that time.  The search firm screens the candidates, does reference checks, prepares a biography forof each candidate for the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee to review and helps set up interviews.  The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and Agilent’sour Chief Executive Officer interview candidates that meet the criteria, and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee selects candidates that best suit the Board’s needs.  We do not use a third partythird-party to evaluate current Board members.

The Nominating/Corporate Governance

Compensation Committee also administers Agilent’s Related Person Transactions PolicyInterlocks and Procedures. See “Related Person Transactions Policy and Procedures” for more information.



Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Executive CommitteeInsider Participation

The Executive Committee meets or takes written action when the Board is not otherwise meeting. The Committee has full authority to act on behalf of the Board, except that it cannot amend Agilent’s Bylaws, recommend any action that requires the approval of the stockholders, fill vacancies on the Board or any Board committee, fix director compensation, amend or repeal any non-amendable or non-repealable resolution of the Board, declare a distribution to the stockholders except at rates determined by the Board, appoint other committees or take any action not permitted under Delaware law to be delegated to a committee.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

Thecurrent members of the Compensation Committee are Koh Boon Hwee, Sue H. Rataj,Hans E. Bishop, James G. Cullen, Heidi Kunz, George A. Scangos, Ph.D.PhD and Tadataka Yamada, M.D. During the most recent fiscal year, no Agilentnone of our executive officerofficers served on the compensation committee (or equivalent), or the board of directors, of another entity whose executive officer(s) served on Agilent’sour Compensation Committee.

The members of the Compensation Committee are considered independent under the Company’scompany’s Board of Directors and Compensation Committee Independence Standards as set forth in the Company’scompany’s Amended and Restated Corporate Governance Guidelines.

14


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS POLICY AND PROCEDURES

The Company’s Standards of Business Conduct and Director Code of Ethics require that all employees and directors avoid conflicts of interests that interfere with the performance of their duties or the best interests of the Company. In addition, the Company has adopted a written Related Person Transactions Policy and Procedures (the “Related Person Transactions Policy”) that prohibits any of the Company’s executive officers, directors or any of their immediate family members from entering into a transaction with the Company, except in accordance with the policy. For purposes of the policy, a “related person transaction” includes any transaction (within the meaning of Item 404(a) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation S-K) involving the Company and any related person that would be required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404(a) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation S-K.

Under our Related Person Transactions Policy, the General Counsel must advise the Nominating/ Corporate Governance Committee of any related person transaction of which she becomes aware. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee must then either approve or reject the transaction in accordance with the terms of the policy. In the course of making this determination, the Nominating/ Corporate Governance Committee shall consider all relevant information available to it and, as appropriate, must take into consideration the following:

the size of the transaction and the amount payable to the related person;
the nature of the interest of the related person in the transaction;
whether the transaction may involve a conflict of interest; and
whether the transaction involved the provision of goods or services to the Company that areavailable from unaffiliated third parties and, if so, whether the transaction is on terms andmade under circumstances that are at least as favorable to the Company as would be availablein comparable transactions with or involving unaffiliated third parties.

Under the Related Person Transactions Policy, Company management screens for any potential related person transactions, primarily through the annual circulation of a Director and Officer Questionnaire (“D&O Questionnaire”) to each memberCommittees of the Board of Directors and each officer

Our Board met six times in fiscal 2017.  Each director attended at least 75% of the Company that is a reporting person under Section 16aggregate number of Board and applicable committee meetings held when the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The D&O Questionnaire contains questions intended to identify related persons and transactions between



Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

the Company and related persons. If a related person transaction is identified, such transaction is brought to the attention of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee for its approval, ratification, revision, or rejection in consideration of all of the relevant facts and circumstances.

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee must approve or ratify each related person transaction in accordance with the policy. Absent this approval or ratification, no such transaction may be entered into by the Company with any related person.

In March 2008, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee amended the Related Person Transactions Policy to provide for standing pre-approval of limited transactions with related persons. Pre-approved transactions include:

(a) Any transaction with another company at which a related person’s only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer or an equivalent), director or beneficial owner of less than 10% of that company’s shares, if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed the greater of (i) $1,000,000, or (ii) 2 percent of that company’s total annual revenues.
(b) Any charitable contribution, grant or endowment by the Company to a charitable organization, foundation or university at which a related person’s only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer or an equivalent), a director or a trustee, if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed the lesser of $500,000, or 2 percent of the charitable organization’s total annual receipts.

Agilent will disclose the terms of related person transactions in its filings with the SEC to the extent required.

Transactions with Related Persons

We purchase services, supplies, and equipment in the normal course of business from many suppliers and sell or lease products and services to many customers. In some instances, these transactions occur with companies with which members of our management or Board of Directors have relationships as directors or executive officers. For transactions entered into during fiscal year 2015, no related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. None of the fiscal year 2015 transactions exceeded or fell outside of the pre-approved thresholds set forth in our Related Party Transaction Policy except for the transactions with Biogen Inc. (“Biogen”) and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (“UTSW”). George A. Scangos, Ph.D. is the Chief Executive Officer of Biogen and Daniel K. Podolsky, M.D., is the President of UTSW. The members of the Nominating/ Corporate Governance Committee, excluding Dr. Scangos and Dr. Podolsky for their respective transactions only, reviewed, approved and ratified the transactions with Biogen and UTSW in accordance with the policy.

The following list identifies which of these companies purchased from Agilent, or sold to Agilent, more than $120,000 in products and/or services in fiscal 2015.

Biogen Inc. (“Biogen”). Mr. George A. Scangos, Ph.D. is the Chief Executive Officer and a directorof Biogen. Biogen, or its affiliates, purchased from Agilent an aggregate of approximately $2.6million in products and/or services.
Bayer A.G. (“Bayer”). Ms. Sue H. Rataj is a director of Bayer. Bayer, or its affiliates, purchasedfrom Agilent an aggregate of approximately $17.9 million of products and/or services.
GlaxoSmithKline (“GSK”). Dr. Daniel K. Podolsky is a director of GSK. GSK, or its affiliates,purchased from Agilent an aggregate of approximately $15.4 million of products and/or services.


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


Johns Hopkins University (“JHU”). Mr. George A. Scangos, Ph.D. is an adjunct professor withthe JHU Department of Biology. JHU, or its affiliates, purchased from Agilent an aggregate ofapproximately $2.9 million in products and/or services.
Keysight Technologies, Inc. (“Keysight”). Messrs. Paul N. Clark and James G. Cullen are directorsof Keysight. Agilent, or its affiliates, purchased from Keysight an aggregate of approximately$3.9 million of products and/or services and Keysight, or its affiliates, purchased from Agilentan aggregate of approximately $67,000 in products and/or services. These amounts excludepayments for rents and utilities covered under certain cost sharing agreements between Agilentand Keysight which are set forth below under “Agreements with Keysight”.
Nanyang Technological University (“Nanyang”). Mr. Koh Boon Hwee is the Chair of the Boardof Trustees of Nanyang. Nanyang, or its affiliates, purchased from Agilent an aggregate ofapproximately $1.02 million of products and/or services.
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. and Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. (collectively,“Takeda”). Dr. Tadataka Yamada served as a director of Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. andas the Chief Medical and Scientific Officer of Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. untilJune 2015. Takeda or its affiliates, purchased from Agilent an aggregate of approximately$3.7 million of products and/or services.
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (“UTSW”). Daniel K. Podolsky, Ph.D. isthe President of UTSW. UTSW, or its affiliates, purchased from Agilent an aggregate ofapproximately $297,000 of products and/or services.

Agreements with Keysight

On November 1, 2014, we completed the spin-off of Keysight Technologies, Inc. (“Keysight”), our electronic measurement business (the “Spin-off”). Following the Spin-off, Agilent and Keysight have operated as separate publicly-traded companies and neither entity has any ownership interest in the other. However, two of our directors, James G. Cullen and Paul N. Clark, servedirector was serving on the board of directors of Keysight. In connection withBoard.  Set forth below are the Spin-off, Agilent and Keysight entered into various agreements, as described below.

Effective as of November 1, 2014, Agilent and Keysight each operate separately as independent publicly-traded companies. Agilent has entered into a separation and distribution agreement with Keysight, which is referred to in this proxy statement as the “separation agreement” or the “separation and distribution agreement.” In connection with the Spin-off, Agilent also entered into various other agreements to effect the Spin-off and provide a framework for its relationship with Keysight after the Spin-off, including a services agreement, a tax matters agreement, an employee matters agreement, an intellectual property matters agreement, a trademark license agreement and a real estate matters agreement (collectively, the “Agreements”).

These Agreements provide for the allocation between Agilent and Keysight of Agilent’s assets, employees, liabilities and obligations (including its investments, property and employee benefits and tax-related assets and liabilities) attributable to periods prior to, at and after Keysight’s separation from Agilent and govern certain relationships between Keysight and Agilent after the Spin-off. The summaries of the Agreements are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of the applicable Agreements, which have been filed as exhibits to Agilent’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on August 5, 2014.

Pursuant to the Agreements, Agilent and Keysight share certain costs related to rents and utilities. In fiscal 2015, Agilent paid approximately $5.3 million in rent/utilities to Keysight and Keysight paid approximately $13 million in rent/utilities to Agilent.



Table of Contents

RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


PROPOSAL 2 — RATIFICATION OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit and Finance Committeefour standing committees of the Board, has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as Agilent’s independent registered public accounting firm to audit its consolidated financial statements fortheir primary duties, their current members and the 2016number of meetings held during fiscal year. During the 2015 fiscal year, PwC served as Agilent’s independent registered public accounting firm and also provided certain tax and other non-audit services. Although Agilent is not required to seek stockholder approval of this appointment, the Board believes it to be sound corporate governance to do so. If the appointment is not ratified, the Audit and Finance Committee will investigate the reasons for stockholder rejection and will reconsider the appointment.2017.

Representatives of PwC are expected to attend the annual meeting where they will be available to respond to questions and, if they desire, to make a statement.

Agilent’s Board recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the
Audit and Finance Committee’s appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Agilent’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Fees Paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees charged to Agilent by PwC for audit services rendered in connection with the audited consolidated financial statements and reports for the 2015 and 2014 fiscal years and for other services rendered during the 2015 and 2014 fiscal years to Agilent and its subsidiaries, as well as all out-of-pocket costs incurred in connection with these services:

     % of          % of 
Fee Category:Fiscal 2015TotalFiscal 2014Total
Audit Fees$4,119,00080.7$7,791,00076.8  
Audit-Related Fees 706,000 13.8  1,695,000 16.7
Tax Fees: 
       Tax compliance/preparation 227,000 4.4  265,000 2.6
       Other tax services0 00
              Total Tax Fees 227,000 4.4  265,000 2.6
All Other Fees54,0001.1392,0003.9
Total Fees$5,106,000 100 $10,143,000 100

Audit Fees: Consists of fees billed for professional services rendered for the integrated audit of Agilent’s consolidated financial statements and its internal control over financial reporting and review of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports. Fiscal 2015 and 2014 fees also consist of fees billed for services that are normally provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in connection with statutory reporting and regulatory filings or engagements, and attest services, except those not required by statute or regulation. Fiscal 2014 audit fees reflect additional fees of $2,800,000 for services performed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in connection with the separation and spin-off of Keysight.

Audit-Related Fees: Consists of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of Agilent’s consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services include employee benefit plan audits, accounting consultations in connection with acquisitions and divestitures, attest services that are not required by statute or regulation, and consultations concerning financial accounting and



Table of Contents

RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


reporting standards. Fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2015 audit-related fees reflect additional fees of $1,670,000 and $665,000 respectively for services performed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in connection with the separation and spin-off of Keysight.

Tax Fees: Consists of fees billed for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. These services include assistance regarding federal, state and international tax compliance, tax audits and appeals, customs and duties, mergers and acquisitions and international tax planning.

All Other Fees: Consists of fees for all other services other than those reported above Agilent has minimized services in this category for fiscal 2015. Total services for fiscal 2015 include $50,000 for a logistics benchmark study provided by PRTM, an affiliate of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and a license for specialized accounting research software. In making its recommendation to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Agilent’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2016, the Audit and Finance Committee has considered whether services other than audit and audit-related services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are compatible with maintaining the independence of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

Policy on Audit and Finance Committee Preapproval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit and Finance Committee’s policy is to preapprove all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Preapproval is generally provided for up to one year and any preapproval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is subject to a specific budget. The Audit and Finance Committee has delegated its preapproval authority up to a specified maximum to the Chairperson of the Audit and Finance Committee, Heidi Fields, who may preapprove all audit and permissible non-audit services so long as her preapproval decisions are reported to the Audit and Finance Committee at its next scheduled meeting.



Table of Contents

AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT


AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee Report does not constitute soliciting material, and shall not be deemed to be filed or incorporated by reference into any other Company filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates the Audit Committee Report by reference therein.

AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

During fiscal year 2015, the Audit and Finance Committee of the Board reviewed the quality and integrity of Agilent’s consolidated financial statements, the effectiveness of its system of internal control over financial reporting, its compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the qualifications and independence of its independent registered public accounting firm, the performance of its internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm and other significant financial matters. Each of the Audit and Finance Committee members satisfies the definition of independent director and is financially literate as established in the New York Stock Exchange Listing Standards. In accordance with section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Board of Directors has identified Heidi Fields as the Audit and Finance Committee’s “Financial Expert.” Agilent operates with a November 1 to October 31 fiscal year. The Audit and Finance Committee met twelve times, including telephone meetings, during the 2015 fiscal year.

The Audit and Finance Committee’s work is guided by a written charter that the Board has approved. The Audit and Finance Committee regularly reviews its charter to ensure that it is meeting all relevant audit committee policy requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the New York Stock Exchange. You can access the latest Audit and Finance Committee charter by clicking on “Governance Policies” in the “Corporate Governance” section of the Web page at www.investor.agilent.com or by writing to us at Agilent Technologies, Inc., 5301 Stevens Creek Blvd., Santa Clara, California 95051, Attention: Investor Relations.

The Audit and Finance Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Agilent’s independent registered public accounting firm, Agilent’s audited consolidated financial statements and Agilent’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit and Finance Committee has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, during the 2015 fiscal year, the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (Communication with Audit Committees) as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T.

The Audit and Finance Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit and Finance Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP its independence from Agilent. Based on the review and discussions noted above, the Audit and Finance Committee recommended to the Board that Agilent’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in Agilent’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015, and be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Submitted by:

Audit and Finance Committee

Heidi Fields, Chairperson
Members

Meetings

Responsible for the oversight of:

Paul N. Clark
Clark† (Chair)

Robert J. Herbold

Daniel K. Podolsky, M.D.




Table of Contents

Sue H. Rataj

11

o

the quality and integrity of our consolidated financial statements;

o

compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including our Standards of Business Conduct;

o

qualifications and independence of our independent auditor;

o

performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm; and

o

other significant financial matters, including borrowings, currency exposures, dividends, share issuance and repurchase and the financial aspects of our benefit plans.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Has the sole authority to appoint, compensate, oversee and replace the independent registered public accounting firm, reviews its internal quality-control procedures, assesses its independence and reviews all relationships between the independent auditor and the company;

Approves the scope of the annual internal and external audit;

Pre-approves all audit and non-audit services and the related fees;

Reviews our consolidated financial statements and disclosures in our reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q;

Monitors the system of internal controls over financial reporting and reviews the integrity of the company’s financial reporting process;

Reviews funding and investment policies and their implementation and the investment performance of our benefit plans;

Establishes and oversees procedures for (a) complaints received by the company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and (b) the confidential anonymous submission by employees of the company of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters; and

Reviews disclosures from our independent registered public accounting firm required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independence of accountant’s communications with the audit committee.

Compensation Committee

Members

Meetings

Approves the corporate goals and objectives related to the compensation of the chief executive officer and other executives, evaluates their performance and approves their annual compensation packages;

Tadataka Yamada, M.D. (Chair)

Hans E. Bishop

James G. Cullen

Heidi Kunz

George A. Scangos, PhD

4

Monitors and approves our benefit plan offerings;

Reviews and approves the Compensation Discussion and Analysis;

Oversees the administration of our incentive compensation, variable pay and stock programs;

Assesses the impact of our compensation programs and arrangements on company risk;

Recommends to the Board the annual retainer fee as well as other compensation for non-employee directors; and

Has sole authority to retain and terminate executive compensation consultants.

Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee

Members

Meetings

Recommends the size and composition of the Board, committee structures and membership;

Koh Boon Hwee (Chair)

Hans E. Bishop

Paul N Clark

James G. Cullen

Robert J. Herbold

Heidi Kunz

Daniel K. Podolsky, M.D.

Sue H. Rataj

George A. Scangos, PhD

Tadataka Yamada, M.D.

5

Establishes criteria for the selection of new directors and proposes a slate of directors for election at each annual meeting;

Reviews special concerns which require the attention of non-employee directors;

Oversees the evaluation of Board members and make recommendations to improve the Board’s effectiveness; and

Develops and reviews corporate governance principles.

Executive Committee

Members

Meetings

Meets or takes written action between meetings of the Board; and

Koh Boon Hwee (Chair)

Michael R. McMullen

0

Has full authority to act on behalf of the Board to the extent permitted by law with certain exceptions.


Dear Agilent Stockholder,† Financial Expert

15


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

FY15 wasRelated Person Transactions Policy and Procedures

Our Standards of Business Conduct and Director Code of Ethics require that all employees and directors avoid conflicts of interests that interfere with the performance of their duties or the best interests of the company. In addition, we have adopted a momentouswritten Related Person Transactions Policy and Procedures (the “Related Person Transactions Policy”) that prohibits any of our executive officers, directors or any of their immediate family members from entering into a transaction with the company, except in accordance with the policy. For purposes of the policy, a “related person transaction” includes any transaction involving the company and any related person that would be required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404(a) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation S-K.

Under our Related Person Transactions Policy, the General Counsel must advise the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee of any related person transaction of which he becomes aware. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee must then either approve or reject the transaction in accordance with the terms of the policy. In the course of making this determination, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee shall consider all relevant information available to it and, as appropriate, must take into consideration the following:

the size of the transaction and the amount payable to the related person;

the nature of the interest of the related person in the transaction;

whether the transaction may involve a conflict of interest; and

whether the transaction involved the provision of goods or services to the company that are available from unaffiliated third parties and, if so, whether the transaction is on terms and made under circumstances that are at least as favorable to the company as would be available in comparable transactions with or involving unaffiliated third parties.

Under the Related Person Transactions Policy, company management screens for any potential related person transactions, primarily through the annual circulation of a Director and Officer Questionnaire (“D&O Questionnaire”) to each member of the Board of Directors and each officer of the company that is a reporting person under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The D&O Questionnaire contains questions intended to identify related persons and transactions between the company and related persons. If a related person transaction is identified, such transaction is brought to the attention of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee for its approval, ratification, revision, or rejection in consideration of all of the relevant facts and circumstances.

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee must approve or ratify each related person transaction in accordance with the policy. Absent this approval or ratification, no such transaction may be entered into by the company with any related person.  The Related Person Transactions Policy provides for standing pre-approval of the following transactions with related persons:

(a)

Any transaction with another company at which a related person’s only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer or an equivalent), director or beneficial owner of less than 10% of that company’s shares, if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed the greater of (i) $1,000,000, or (ii) 2 percent of that company’s total annual revenues.

(b)

Any charitable contribution, grant or endowment by the company to a charitable organization, foundation or university at which a related person’s only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer or an equivalent), a director or a trustee, if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed the lesser of $500,000, or 2 percent of the charitable organization’s total annual receipts.

We will disclose the terms of related person transactions in our filings with the SEC to the extent required.

Transactions with Related Persons

We purchase services, supplies, and equipment in the normal course of business from many suppliers and sell or lease products and services to many customers. In some instances, these transactions occur with companies with which members of our management or Board have relationships as directors or executive officers. For transactions entered into during fiscal year 2017, no related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.   None of the fiscal year 2017 transactions exceeded or fell outside of the pre-approved thresholds set forth in our Related Person Transactions Policy except for Agilent. We enteredtransactions with Biogen Inc. (“Biogen”), the yearUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (“UTSW”) and Juno Therapeutics, Inc. (“Juno”).  


16


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

George A. Scangos, PhD served as a stand-alone Life Sciences, Diagnostics and Applied Markets company, having just completed the spin-off of Keysight Technologies. On March 18, 2015, we appointed Mike McMullen as Agilent’s 3rd Chief Executive Officer succeeding Bill Sullivanof Biogen until January 2017, Daniel K. Podolsky, M.D., is the President of UTSW and Hans E. Bishop, who announced his decisionjoined our Board in July 2017, is the Chief Executive Officer of Juno.  The members of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, excluding Dr. Scangos, Dr. Podolsky and Mr. Bishop, for their respective transactions only, reviewed, approved and ratified the transactions with Biogen, UTSW and Juno in accordance with the policy.

Below is a summary of the aggregate transactions between Agilent and each of Biogen, UTSW and Juno that occurred in fiscal 2017 or during the time such Agilent director served as an officer of Biogen, UTSW or Juno.

Biogen Inc. (“Biogen”). Mr. George A. Scangos, PhD served as the Chief Executive Officer and a director of Biogen until January 2017. Biogen, or its affiliates, purchased an aggregate of approximately $313,000 of products and/or services from us between November 2016 and January 2017.

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (“UTSW”). Daniel K. Podolsky, PhD is the President of UTSW. UTSW, or its affiliates, purchased an aggregate of approximately $600,000 of products and/or services from us during fiscal 2017.

Juno Therapeutics, Inc. (“Juno”).  Hans E. Bishop is the Chief Executive Officer of Juno.   Juno, or its affiliates, purchased an aggregate of approximately $294,000 of products and/or services from us between July 2017 (when Mr. Bishop joined our Board) and October 2017.

17


PROPOSAL 2 – APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE 2009 STOCK PLAN

PROPOSAL NO. 2 - APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE  2009 STOCK PLAN

On November 15, 2017, the Board of Directors approved the 2018 Stock Plan (the “2018 Plan”), which is an amendment and restatement of the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2009 Stock Plan (the “2009 Plan”), subject to retire last year. We offer Billyour approval at the annual meeting. The 2009 Plan replaced the Agilent Technologies, Inc. Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Plan (the “1999 Plan”) and the 1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan (the “Director Plan” and collectively with the 1999 Plan, the “1999 Plans”) and is our heartfelt thanksprimary plan for his leadershipproviding stock‑based incentive compensation to our eligible employees and non-employee directors. The 2009 Plan reserved for issuance 25,000,000 shares, plus any shares subject to awards previously granted under the 1999 Plan for which such awards are forfeited, expired or become unexercisable without having been exercised in full.  

The 2009 Stock Plan was adopted by the Board on November 19, 2008 and was subsequently approved by stockholders at our annual meeting held on March 11, 2009.  The 2009 Plan is scheduled to expire on March 11, 2019 which is before our regularly scheduled 2019 annual meeting of stockholders.  If the 2018 Plan is not approved by the stockholders, no new awards may be granted under the 2009 Plan after March 11, 2019 and our ability to provide future awards to attract, provide incentives to and retain key personnel and non-employee directors would be limited significantly.

As described in more detail below, approval of the 2018 Stock Plan will accomplish the following:

Rename the 2009 Stock Plan to the 2018 Stock Plan;

Extend the term of the 2009 Plan to March 21, 2028;

Maintain the 2009 Plan’s strong governance features;

Continue the grant of awards that are intended to qualify as tax-deductible under Section 162(m) (“Section 162(m)”) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”); and

Reestablish certain award limitations for non-employee directors and performance-based compensation under Section 162(m).

Stockholders are asked to approve the 2018 Plan to qualify stock options as incentive stock options for purposes of Section 422 of the Code, to qualify certain compensation under the Plan as performance‑based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m), and to satisfy New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) guidelines relating to equity compensation.

Below is a summary of the material features of the 2018 Plan and its operation. This summary does not purport to be a complete description of all of the provisions of the 2018 Plan. It is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2018 Plan.  A copy of the 2018 Plan is attached as Appendix B to this Proxy Statement.

Purpose of the 2018 Plan

The purpose of the 2018 Plan is to encourage ownership in the Company by its employees, directors and consultants whose long-term employment by or involvement with the Company is considered essential to the Company’s continued progress and, thereby, aligning the interests of the award recipients and stockholders and permitting the award recipients to share in the Company’s success. The 2018 Plan provides an essential component of the total compensation package offered to the Company’s key employees. It reflects the importance placed by the Company on motivating employees to achieve superior results over the long term and paying employees based on that kind of achievement. The Company strongly believes that its equity compensation programs and emphasis on employee stock ownership have been integral to the Company’s success and that a continuation of those programs is necessary for the Company to achieve superior performance in the future.

Certain awards under the 2018 Plan are intended to qualify as performance‑based compensation under the Code, provided that such grants are made in the form of option grants, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), or are performance shares or performance units based on one or more of the performance measures specified below. However, in the event that the Administrator (as defined

18


PROPOSAL 2 – APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE 2009 STOCK PLAN

below in “Administration of the 2018 Plan”) of the 2018 Plan determines that it is advisable to grant awards that use measures other than 35 yearsthose specified below, any such awards will not qualify for the performance‑based exception under Section 162(m).

Key Features of the 2018 Plan

The 2018 Plan contains features that the Board believes are consistent with HP/Agilent,the interests of stockholders and sound governance principles. These features include the following:

Flexibility and Performance Ties.  The variety of equity and cash awards permitted under the 2018 Plan affords flexibility with respect to the design of long-term incentives that are responsive to evolving regulatory changes and compensation best practices and incorporate tailored, performance‑based measures.

No Discount Options.  Stock options or SARs may not be granted or awarded with a then-established exercise price of less than the fair market value (“FMV”) of Agilent’s common stock on the date of grant or award. FMV is the quoted closing sales price on the stock exchange or a national market system with the highest trading volume.

No Repricing.  The repricing of stock options and stock appreciation rights is prohibited without stockholder approval. This prohibition applies both to repricings that involve lowering the exercise price of a stock option or SAR as well as repricings that are accomplished by canceling an existing award and replacing it with a lower‑priced award.

Fungible Share Pool.  The 2018 Plan design recognizes the greater intrinsic value of a full share award including 10 years as CEO.restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares and performance stock units. Accordingly, the 2018 Plan’s share reserve is reduced by 2 shares for every 1 full value share awarded. Stock option and SAR awards reduce the reserve on a 1-to-1 basis.

Clawback Feature.  The 2018 Plan allows the Company to cancel or freeze unvested awards, or require the return of amounts received pursuant to plan awards, if the award recipient has engaged in behavior that is detrimental to the business or reputation of the Company.

Establishing AgilentNo Liberal Share Accounting.  Shares withheld for tax payments or to pay the exercise price, shares repurchased on the open market with the proceeds of an option exercise price, or shares not issued or delivered as a pure Life Sciences companyresult of the net settlement of an outstanding award, will not be added back into the 2018 Plan reserve.

Compensation Committee Oversight.  The 2018 Plan will be administered by Agilent’s Compensation Committee as the Administrator, which is comprised solely of non-employee, independent directors.

No Annual “Evergreen” Provision.  The 2018 Plan provides for a specific number of shares of Agilent common stock available for awards and does not contain an annual or automatic increase in the appointmentnumber of a new CEO were both catalysts foravailable shares.

Performance‑Based Compensation.  The 2018 Plan is structured to permit awards that satisfy the performance‑based compensation requirements of Section 162(m) so as to enhance deductibility of compensation provided under the 2018 Plan.

Limitation on Share-based Awards to Non-Employee Directors.  The 2018 Plan provides that the maximum total grant date fair value of share-based awards granted to non-employee director in any single calendar year may not exceed $750,000.

Administration of the 2018 Plan

The 2018 Plan may be administered by the Board or any of its committees (“Administrator”) and, it is currently the intent of the Board that the 2018 Plan be administered by the Compensation Committee, which committee satisfies the requirements of Section 162(m) regarding a committee of two or more “outside directors”, as well as a committee of “non-employee directors” for purposes of Rule 16b-3. The Administrator has the power in its discretion to review our Executive Compensation programsgrant awards under the 2018 Plan, to ensure theydetermine the terms of such awards, to interpret the provisions of the 2018 Plan and to take action as it deems necessary or advisable for the administration of the 2018 Plan. In accordance with the terms of the 2018 Plan, the 2018 Plan may be administered by different committees with respect to different groups of participants in the 2018 Plan.

19


PROPOSAL 2 – APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE 2009 STOCK PLAN

Number of Authorized Shares

The total number of shares authorized and available for issuance under the 2018 Plan is 25,000,000, plus any shares subject to awards previously granted under the 1999 Plan for which such awards are forfeited, expired or become unexercisable without having been exercised in full. It is anticipated that this share reserve will be sufficient to cover all Company stock awards through fiscal 2028. Shares granted as options or SARs will be counted against this limit as one share for every one share granted. Shares granted as awards other than options or SARs will be counted against this limit as two shares for every one share granted. The maximum number of options or SARs under the 2018 Plan that may be granted in any one fiscal year to an individual participant may not exceed 1,500,000 shares. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in connection with a participant’s initial service, such participant may be granted awards for up to an additional 1,000,000 shares that will not count against this limit. Shares issued under the 2018 Plan may be currently authorized but unissued shares, or shares currently held or subsequently acquired by the Company as treasury shares, including shares purchased in the open market or in private transactions. On January 23, 2018, the per share closing price of Agilent’s common stock as reported on the NYSE was $73.44.

In the event of certain changes in the capitalization of the Company the Administrator will adjust the number and class of shares available for issuance under the 2018 Plan and to prevent dilution or enlargement of rights. Except as described below, shares subject to an award under the 2018 Plan or under the 1999 Plan that are terminated, expire unexercised, or are forfeited, or repurchased by the Company at their original purchase price shall be available for subsequent awards under the 2018 Plan. Any shares that again become available for issuance under the 2018 Plan will be added back on a one to one basis for shares subject to options or SARs (as defined below in “—Types of Awards under the 2018 Plan”), or on a two to one basis for awards other than options or SARs.

Awards granted in assumption of, or in substitution for, awards previously granted by a company acquired by, or merged into, the Company or a subsidiary (“Substitute Awards”) will not reduce the shares authorized for issuance under the 2018 Plan or authorized for grant to a participant in any calendar year. Further, shares available for grant under stock plans assumed by the Company in an acquisition may be added to the available share reserve under the 2018 Plan.

Payments of the exercise price or applicable taxes made by delivery of shares to, or withholding of shares by, the Company in satisfaction of a participant’s obligations, or shares repurchased on the open market with the proceeds of an option exercise price, will not result in additional shares becoming available for subsequent awards under the 2018 Plan.

Eligibility and Participation

Eligibility to participate in the 2018 Plan is limited to employees (including officers), directors and consultants of Agilent, its affiliates or subsidiaries, as determined by the Administrator. Participation in the 2018 Plan is at the discretion of the Administrator.  As of January 23, 2018, there were competitiveapproximately 13,500 employees, ten nonemployee directors and approximately 50 consultants eligible to receive awards under the 2018 Plan.  We currently do not make awards to consultants.

Types of Awards under the 2018 Plan

The 2018 Plan authorizes the Administrator to grant awards, individually or collectively, to participants in any of the following forms, subject to such terms, conditions, and provisions as the Administrator may determine to be necessary or desirable:

incentive stock options (“ISOs”);

nonstatutory stock options (“NSOs”);

stock appreciation rights;

restricted stock;

restricted stock units (“RSUs”);

performance shares and performance units with Agilent’s newperformance‑based conditions to vesting or exercisability; and

cash awards.

20


PROPOSAL 2 – APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE 2009 STOCK PLAN

Options and SARs

Stock options entitle the option holder to purchase shares at a price established by the Administrator. Options may be either ISOs or NSOs, provided that only employees may be granted ISOs. SARs entitle the SAR holder to receive cash equal to the positive difference (if any) between the fair market value of shares on the trading date and the exercise price. The Company currently awards only NSOs to its executives, employees and nonemployee directors. In fiscal year 2018, approximately 76 employees were classified as executives and there were ten nonemployee directors. The Company does not currently have a practice of awarding ISOs or SARs.

Exercise Price

The Administrator will determine the exercise price of an option and a SAR at the date of grant, which price, except in the case of Substitute Awards, may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant. The 2018 Plan prohibits any repricing, replacement, regrant or modification of stock options or SARs that would reduce the exercise price of the stock options or SARs without stockholder approval, other than in connection with a change in the Company’s capitalization or Substitute Awards.

Vesting/Expiration of Options

The Administrator may determine the terms under which options and SARs will vest and become exercisable. The Company’s current practice is to vest options at 25% per year over 4 years, with a 10-year option term, except where different vesting or option terms are required or are advisable under local law.

Special Limitations on ISOs

If options were to be granted as ISOs, these options would be subject to certain additional restrictions imposed on ISOs by the Code including, but not limited to, restrictions on the post-termination exercise period of such options, the status of the individual receiving the grant and the number of options that could become exercisable for the first time by a participant in a given calendar year.  Furthermore, if shares acquired upon exercise of an ISO are disposed of by a participant prior to the expiration of two years from the date of grant or one year from the date of exercise, or otherwise in a “disqualifying disposition” under the Code, the participant would have federal income tax consequences as described under “—U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences”.

Exercise of Options

An option holder may exercise his or her option by giving written notice to the Company or a duly authorized agent of the Company stating the number of shares for which the option is being exercised and tendering payment for such shares. The Administrator may, in its discretion, accept cash, check or wire transfer, previously acquired shares (valued at their fair market value on the date of exercise) and consideration under a cashless exercise program, or a combination thereof as payment.

Surrender or Exchange of SARs

Upon surrender of a SAR, a participant will be entitled to receive cash, shares or a combination thereof, as specified in the award agreement, having an aggregate fair market value equal to the excess of (i) the fair market value of one share as of the date on which the non-tandem SAR is exercised over (ii) the base price of the shares covered by the non-tandem SAR, multiplied by the number of shares covered by the SAR, or the portion thereof being exercised.

Termination of Options and SARs

In the event that a participant’s service with the Company or its subsidiaries terminates prior to the expiration of an option or SAR, the participant’s right to exercise vested options or SARS shall be governed by the terms of the applicable award agreement approved by the Administrator at the time of grant.

21


PROPOSAL 2 – APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE 2009 STOCK PLAN

Stock Awards and Performance Shares

Stock awards, including restricted stock, RSUs, performance shares and performance units, may be issued either alone, in addition to, or in tandem with other awards granted under the 2018 Plan. Stock awards may be denominated in shares or units payable in shares (e.g. RSUs), and may be settled in cash, shares, or a combination of cash and shares. Restricted stock granted to participants may not be sold, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered or disposed of during the restricted period established by the Administrator. The Administrator may also impose additional restrictions on a participant’s right to dispose of or to encumber restricted stock, including the satisfaction of performance objectives.

The Company currently grants RSUs to certain employees who are not executives of the Company. Grants are typically made once a year and vest 25% per year over 4 years unless different vesting is required or advisable under local law. The Company currently grants performance‑based RSUs annually to its executives pursuant to the Long Term Performance Program (“LTP” or the “LTP Program”). LTP awards are generally designed to meet the criteria of a performance award with the performance metrics and peer group supportedcomparison set at the company’s future growth strategy,beginning of the performance period and clearly aligned our officer’s pay with strong businessare not thereafter modified. LTP awards are paid out based upon a 3-year performance period and shareholder value creation. only if the established performance criteria have been met, as determined by the Administrator. The Company also makes New Executive Stock Awards to newly hired or promoted executives, which are RSUs that mirror the LTP performance criteria for a 3-year performance period that is already in progress when an executive is first hired or is first promoted to an executive position.

In addition, the Company grants RSUs to these catalysts for change, we were disappointed that our 2015 Management Say on Pay proposal only received 60% support from shareholders following many years of receiving support of 90% or better. While much of this low support is attributablenonemployee directors (referred to Mr. Sullivan’s fiscal year 2014 retention RSU and the size of his grants in the year2018 Plan as “Deferred Shares”) which are subject to payment and deferral rules intended to comply with Section 409A of his retirement (whichthe Code.

Termination of Stock Awards

In the event that a participant’s service with the Company or its subsidiaries terminates prior to the vesting of a stock award, that award will be forfeited unless the terms of the award, as approved by the Administrator at the time of grant, we thoughtprovide for accelerated vesting.

Cash Incentive Awards

The Administrator may grant “cash incentive awards” under the 2018 Plan, which is the grant of a right to receive a payment of cash (or in the discretion of the Administrator, shares of common stock having value equivalent to the cash otherwise payable) that are contingent on achievement of performance objectives over a specified period established by the Administrator. The grant of cash incentive awards may also be subject to such other conditions, restrictions and contingencies, as determined by the Administrator, including provisions relating to deferred payment.

Qualifying Performance‑Based Compensation

The Administrator may specify that the grant, retention, vesting, or issuance of any award (whether in the form of a stock option, SAR, restricted stock, RSU or a performance award) or the amount to be paid out under any award, be subject to or based on performance objectives or other standards of financial performance and/or personal performance evaluations, whether or not established and administered in accordance with the requirements of Section 162(m) for awards intended to qualify as “performance‑based compensation” thereunder. The number of shares issued or the amount paid under an award may, to the extent specified in the award agreement, be reduced by the Administrator on the basis of such further considerations as the Administrator in its sole discretion shall determine.

Establishment of Performance Goals

At the beginning of each performance period the Administrator will establish performance goals applicable to the performance awards. To the extent that performance conditions under the 2018 Plan are applied to awards intended to qualify as performance‑based compensation under Section 162(m), such performance goals will be objectively measurable and will be based upon the achievement of a specified percentage or level in one or more criteria of the following criteria and any objectively verifiable adjustment(s) thereto permitted and pre-established by the Administrator in accordance with Section 162(m), as determined by the Administrator in its sole discretion: (i) revenue; (ii) margin; (iii) income; (iv) earnings or income measures (including earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization); (v) pre-tax profit; (vi) expenses; (vii) share price

22


PROPOSAL 2 – APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE 2009 STOCK PLAN

performance; (viii) earnings per share; (ix) return measures (including return on assets, capital, invested capital, equity, sales or revenue); (x) economic value added; (xi) market share; (xii) safety; (xiii) total stockholder return; (xiv) cash flow (including free cash flow); (xv) size-adjusted growth in earnings; (xvi) net order dollars; (xvii) contract bookings; (xviii) contract awards; (xix) book to bill; (xx) backlog; (xxi) customer metrics (including service, satisfaction, retention or profitability); (xxii) productivity; (xxiii) expense targets; (xxiv) market share; (xxv) cost control measures; (xxvi) balance sheet metrics; (xxvii) strategic initiatives; (xxviii) implementation, completion or attainment of measurable objectives with respect to recruitment or retention of personnel or employee satisfaction; (xxix) successful completion of, or achievement of milestones or objectives related to financing or capital raising transactions, strategic acquisitions or divestitures, joint ventures, partnerships, collaborations or other transactions; (xxx) debt levels or debt ratios; (xxxi) operating efficiency; (xxxii) working capital targets, including days working capital; (xxxiii) quantifiable, objective measures of individual performance relevant to the particular individual’s job responsibilities; (xxxiv) any combination or the foregoing business criteria; and (xxxv) such other criteria as determined by the Committee.  

Any criteria that are financial metrics may be determined in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) or may be adjusted when established (or to the extent permitted under Section 162(m), at any time thereafter) to include or exclude any items otherwise includable or excludable under GAAP.  The performance goals may be based on one or more business criteria, one or more business units, divisions, subsidiaries or business segments of the Company and/or one or more product lines or products of the company, or the Company as a whole, and if so desired by the Administrator, on an absolute or relative basis. Performance awards granted under the 2018 Plan may contain such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of the 2018 Plan, as the Administrator may determine, provided that, if the performance awards are intended to qualify as performance‑based compensation under Section 162(m), such additional terms and conditions are also not inconsistent with Section 162(m).

Limited Transferability of Awards

The Administrator retains the authority and discretion to permit an award (other than an ISO) to be transferable as long as such transfers are made by a participant to the participant’s immediate family or trusts established solely for the benefit of one or more members of the participant’s immediate family. Awards may otherwise not be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred, or disposed of in any manner other than by the beneficiary designation, will or by the laws of descent or distribution and may be exercised, during the lifetime of the participant, only by the participant.

Tax Withholding

The Administrator may require payment, or withhold payments made by the 2018 Plan, to satisfy applicable withholding tax requirements.

Change in Control

Unless otherwise determined by the Administrator and set forth in the applicable award agreement, in the event of certain transactions described in the 2018 Plan constituting a change in control or the sale of substantially all of the assets of the Company for which a participant is performing services, all awards will fully vest immediately prior to the closing of the transaction. The foregoing shall not apply where such awards are assumed, converted or replaced in full by the successor corporation or a parent or subsidiary of the successor; provided, however, that in the event of a change of control in which one or more of the successor or a parent or subsidiary of the successor has issued publicly traded equity securities, the assumption, conversion, replacement or continuation shall be made by an entity with publicly traded securities and shall provide that the holders of such assumed, converted, replaced or continued stock options and SARs shall be able to acquire such publicly traded securities.

In the event of the dissolution or liquidation of the Company, the Administrator in its sole discretion may provide for an option or SAR to be fully vested and exercisable until ten days prior to such transaction, or such shorter reasonable period of time as the Administrator may establish in its discretion. In addition, the Administrator may provide that any restrictions on any award shall lapse prior to the transaction, provided the proposed dissolution or liquidation takes place at the time and in the manner contemplated. To the extent it has not been previously exercised, an award will terminate immediately prior to the consummation of such proposed transaction.

23


PROPOSAL 2 – APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE 2009 STOCK PLAN

Termination and Amendment of the 2018 Plan

The Board may amend, suspend or terminate the 2018 Plan or the Administrator’s authority to grant awards under the 2018 Plan without the consent of stockholders or participants; provided, however, that any amendment to the 2018 Plan will be submitted to the Company’s stockholders for approval if such stockholder approval is required by any federal or state law or regulation or the rules of any stock exchange or automated quotation system on which the shares may then be listed or quoted and the Board may otherwise, in its sole discretion, determine to submit other amendments to the 2018 Plan to stockholders for approval. Except in the event of certain changes in the capitalization of the Company, the total number of shares authorized and available for issuance under the 2018 Plan may not be increased by the Company without stockholder approval. Any such amendment, suspension, or termination may not materially and adversely affect the rights of a participant under any award previously granted without such participant’s consent.

It is the intention of the Company that, to the extent that any provisions of the 2018 Plan or any awards granted under the 2018 Plan are subject to Section 409A of the Code (relating to nonqualified deferred compensation), the 2018 Plan and the awards comply with requirements of Section 409A of the Code. Further, it is the intention of the Company that the 2018 Plan and awards granted under it that are subject to Section 409A of the Code will be interpreted and administered in good faith in accordance with such requirements and that the Administrator will have the authority to amend any outstanding awards to conform to the requirements of Section 409A.

Term of 2018 Plan

Unless earlier terminated by the Board, the 2018 Plan will terminate ten years after its approval by the stockholders of the Company.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

Stock options.  There will be no federal income tax consequences to a participant or the Company upon the grant of either an ISO or an NSO under the 2018 Plan. Upon exercise of an NSO, the option holder generally will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to: (i) the fair market value, on the date of exercise, of the acquired shares, less (ii) the exercise price of the NSO. Provided the Company satisfies applicable reporting requirements, it will be entitled to a tax deduction in the same amount.

Upon the exercise of an ISO, an option holder generally recognizes no immediate ordinary taxable income. Provided that certain holding periods are met, income recognition is deferred until the option holder sells the shares. If the ISO is exercised no later than three months after the termination of the option holder’s employment, and the option holder does not dispose of the shares so acquired within two years from the date the ISO was consistentgranted and within one year after the exercise of the ISO, the gain on the sale will be treated as long-term capital gain. Certain of these employment requirements are liberalized in the event of an option holder’s death or disability while employed by the Company.

Generally, the Company will not be entitled to any tax deduction for the grant or exercise of an ISO. If, however, the shares are not held for the full term of the holding period outlined above, the gain on the sale of such shares, being the lesser of: (i) the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise minus the exercise price, or (ii) the amount realized on disposition minus the exercise price, will be taxed to the participant as ordinary income, and provided the Company satisfies applicable reporting requirements, the Company will be entitled to a deduction in the same amount. The excess of the fair market value of the shares acquired upon exercise of an ISO over the exercise price therefor constitutes a tax preference item for purposes of computing the “alternative minimum tax” under the Code.

SARs.  There will be no federal income tax consequences to either a participant or the Company upon the grant of a SAR. However, the participant generally will recognize ordinary income upon the exercise of a SAR in an amount equal to the aggregate amount of cash and the fair market value of the shares received upon exercise. Provided the Company satisfies applicable reporting requirements, the Company will be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount included in the participant’s income.

24


PROPOSAL 2 – APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE 2009 STOCK PLAN

RSUs & Restricted Stock.  Except as otherwise provided below, there will be no federal income tax consequences to either a participant or the Company upon the grant of restricted stock or an RSU. When an RSU is settled, the participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares received or, if the RSU is paid in cash, the amount payable. With respect to restricted stock, the participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess, if any that the participant paid for the shares over the fair market value of the shares on the earlier of (i) the date of vesting; and (ii) the date the shares become transferable. Subject to Section 162(m), and provided the Company satisfies applicable reporting requirements, the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction. Notwithstanding the above, a recipient of a restricted stock grant may make an election under Section 83(b) of the Code, within thirty days after the date of the grant, to recognize ordinary income as of the date of grant and the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction at that time.

Performance Awards.  There will be no federal income tax consequences to a participant or the Company upon the grant of qualifying performance‑based compensation awards. Participants will generally recognize taxable income upon the payment of an award, and subject to Section 162(m), the Company generally will be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount includible in the participant’s income.

Golden Parachute Payments.  Awards that are granted, accelerated or enhanced upon the occurrence of, or in anticipation of, a change in control may give rise, in whole or in part, to “excess parachute payments” under Section 280G and Section 4999 of the Code. Under these provisions, the participant would be subject to a 20% excise tax on, and the Company would be denied a deduction with respect to, any “excess parachute payments.”

Section 162(m) of the Code.  Section 162(m) generally provides that publicly held companies may not deduct compensation paid to certain of its top executive officers to the extent such compensation exceeds $1 million per officer in any year. However, pursuant to regulations issued by the Treasury Department that currently apply to the Company, certain limited exceptions to Section 162(m) apply with respect to “performance‑based compensation,” that complies with conditions imposed by Section 162(m) rules and the material terms of such compensation are disclosed to and approved by stockholders. Stock options, SARs and performance awards granted under the 2018 Plan and described above are intended to constitute qualified performance‑based compensation eligible for such exceptions. The Administrator will, in general, seek to qualify compensation paid to the Company’s executive officers for deductibility under Section 162(m), although the Administrator believes it is appropriate to retain the flexibility to authorize payments of compensation that may not qualify for deductibility if, in the Administrator’s judgment, it is in the Company’s best interest to do so.  Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, effective for our taxable year beginning November 1, 2018, the exception for performance-based compensation will no longer be available, subject to transition relief for certain grandfathered arrangements in effect as of November 2, 2017.

New Plan Benefits

A new plan benefits table for the 2018 Plan and the benefits or amounts that would have been received by or allocated to participants for the last completed fiscal year under the 2018 Plan if the 2018 Plan was then in effect, as described in the federal proxy rules, are not provided because all awards made under the 2018 Plan will be made at the Committee’s discretion, subject to the terms of the 2018 Plan. Therefore, the benefits and amounts that will be received or allocated under the 2018 Plan are not determinable at this time. The equity grant program for our non-employee directors is described under the Director Compensation section in this proxy statement.

25


PROPOSAL 2 – APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE 2009 STOCK PLAN

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table summarizes information about our equity compensation plans as of October 31, 2017. All outstanding awards relate to our common stock.

Plan Category

Number of Securities

to be Issued upon

Exercise of

Outstanding Options,

Warrants and Rights

 

Weighted-average

Exercise Price of

Outstanding

Options, Warrants and

Rights

 

Number of Securities

Remaining Available for

Future Issuance under

Equity Compensation Plans

(Excluding Securities

Reflected in Column (a))

 

(a)

 

(b)

 

(c)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)(2)(3)

6,063,545

 

$

34

 

35,697,020

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

 

 

Total

6,063,545

 

$

34

 

35,697,020

_______________________

(1)

The number of securities remaining available for future issuance in column (c) includes 27,556,310 shares of common stock authorized and available for issuance under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("423(b) Plan"). The number of shares authorized for issuance under the 423(b) Plan is subject to an automatic annual increase of the lesser of one percent of the outstanding common stock of Agilent or an amount determined by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors. Under the terms of the 423(b) Plan, in no event shall the aggregate number of shares issued under the Plan exceed 75 million shares.

(2)

We issue securities under our equity compensation plans in forms other than options, warrants or rights. On November 19, 2008 and March 11, 2009, the Board and the stockholders, respectively, approved the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2009 Stock Plan ("2009 Plan") to replace the company's 1999 Plan and 1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan for awards of stock-based incentive compensation to our employees (including officers), directors and consultants. The 2009 Plan provides for the grant of awards in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares and performance units with performance-based conditions to vesting or exercisability, and cash awards. The 2009 Plan has a term of ten years.

(3)

We issue securities under our equity compensation plans in forms which do not require a payment by the recipient to us at the time of exercise or vesting, including restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance units. Accordingly, the weighted-average exercise price in column (b) does not take these awards into account.

Agilent’s Board recommends a vote FOR the approval of the

adoption of the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2018 Stock Plan

26


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Dear Stockholder,

We are very pleased with our pay-for-performance philosophy)fiscal year 2017 results.  Our adjusted operating margins were 22.0%, we decidedmeeting our CEO’s commitment to take a wholesale review ofshareholders for 2017, and earnings per share increased by 19.2% over fiscal year 2016. The company continues to create stockholder value through dividends, stock buy-backs and smart acquisitions that bolster our entire program.market position. The leadership team that our CEO Mike McMullen appointed in fiscal year 2015 has built tremendous momentum throughout the years, expanding our product portfolio, extending into adjacent markets, and improving the customer experience by streamlining processes, modernizing systems and making the company more efficient and customer friendly.

Accordingly, inWe believe our current executive compensation program is effectively focusing our executive team on the Spring, we first met with 15 of our largest shareholders who own more than 40% of Agilent’s outstanding shares to hear their perspective. The feedback from these sessions touchedmost critical short- and long-term strategic priorities.   Our recent results are evidence that the program is working.  Our executive team is delivering superior results and the company is on a wide range of topicsstrong growth trajectory that led directly to thetranslates into increased stockholder value.  We have continued our ongoing dialog with our stockholders which we believe is valuable.  Our stockholders support our current executive compensation program changes we considered during the year. For example, shareholders stressed the importance of continuing our efforts to strengthen the ties between pay and performance, several voiced concernsee no need for major modifications.  We strongly agree with the CEO’s fiscal year 2014 retention RSU award,this sentiment and some questioned the size of his annual long-term incentive award in the year preceding his retirement. In addition, shareholders provided valuable suggestions regardingthus have made no significant changes to our short and long-term incentive plans.

Based on the feedback we received, we made several changes to our programs for FY16, including increasing our short-term incentive plan’s performance period from six months to one year, adding a financial metric to our long-term performance plan, and adding a one-year post-vest holding period to our stock. In August, our Compensation Committee Chair and members of management met again with a number of our largest shareholders to preview our proposedexecutive compensation program design changes for FY16. We were encouraged by the positive feedback on our proposals as shareholders felt we addressed many of their concerns, so we formally implemented these changes for fiscal year 2016.2018.  After several years of major changes, we believe our current formula is working well.  

In the Compensation Discussion and Analysis that follows, we discuss our CEO’sfiscal year 2017 CEO and Officer’s FY15Officer compensation where youin more detail and share additional information about the program refinements we implemented for fiscal year 2017.  You will see that our commitment to both pay for performance and clear, transparent disclosure is strong. We also provide additional detail on our FY16 executive compensation changes and our approach to our CEO’s and Officer’s pay for the year ahead.  We encourage you to review this analysis carefully and hope you agree that our executive compensation programs supportprogram is achieving our objectives of supporting the company’s growth strategy and are well aligned with creating long-term shareholderstockholder value.

Koh Boon Hwee
(

Compensation Committee Chair)
Sue H. Rataj
Dr.

Tadataka Yamada, M.D., Chairperson

Hans E. Bishop
James G. Cullen
Heidi Kunz

George A. Scangos,
Tadataka Yamada, M.D.
PhD


27




Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This section of the Proxy Statementproxy statement describes the compensation arrangements for our Named Executive Officers (NEOs) for fiscal year 2015,2017, which were exclusively determined by our independent Compensation Committee and which are set forthfurther detailed in the 20152017 Summary Compensation Table and other compensation tables contained in this proxy statement. This Compensation Discussion and Discussion Analysis (“CD&A”)(CD&A) also includes additional information on how the Compensation Committee of our Board (the “Compensation Committee”) arrived at their FY15fiscal year 2017 compensation decisions for the NEOs and an overview of our executive compensation philosophy and our executive compensation program.

NamedOur NEOs for fiscal year 2017 are as follows:

Michael R. McMullen, President and Chief Executive Officers for FY15Officer (CEO)

Michael R. McMullen, President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)(1)
Didier Hirsch, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”)
Mark Doak, Senior Vice President, President Cross-Lab Group (“ACG”)
Henrik Ancher-Jensen, Senior Vice President, President Order Fulfillment and Supply Chain
Patrick Kaltenbach, Senior Vice President, President Life Sciences and Applied Markets Group (“LSAG”)
William P. Sullivan, former Chief Executive Officer(2)
____________________
(1)      Mr. McMullen was appointed CEO on March 18, 2015.
(2)Mr. Sullivan served as CEO until March 17, 2015. He served as a special advisor to the Board and to the CEO for the remainder of fiscal year 2015.

Didier Hirsch, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (CFO)

Mark Doak, Senior Vice President, President Cross-Lab Group (ACG)

Patrick Kaltenbach, Senior Vice President, President Life Sciences and Applied Markets Group (LSAG)

Jacob Thaysen, Senior Vice President, President Diagnostics and Genomics Group (DGG)

Introduction

In this CD&A, we provide the following:

Executive Summary

Determining Executive Pay

Fiscal Year 2017 Compensation

Additional Information


28


Executive Summary
Compensation Philosophy
Determining Executive Pay
Fiscal 2015 Compensation
Additional Information


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Executive Summary

Fiscal 2015 was a year of leadership transition and our first year as a standalone company. Fiscal 2015Year 2017 at a glance:

Performance and Compensation Highlights

CEO and NEO Compensation

   Exceeded the financial plan outlined to investors, including strong growth, expanded margins, balanced use of capital and stockholder value creation

   Strong stock performance, with year-over-year returns that beat the S&P 500 by 144%

   Strong alignment between current executive compensation program and increased stockholder value creation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Target Compensation

Performance-based Compensation

 

 

Mr. McMullen

$9,530,000

88%

 

 

Other NEOs (average)

$2,856,000

81%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Compensation Program Changes for FY17

Pay for Performance

   Earnings Per Share replaced Operating Margin as the financial metric for long-term incentive awards

   Operating Margin replaced ROIC as financial metric in the short-term incentive plan

   CEO and CFO short-term incentives were based 100% on financial results rather than a mix of 75% financial results and 25% key business initiatives

In line with strong company performance that surpassed our plan, the Short-Term Incentive program (financial targets) paid out at 111% of target.

25% of the short-term incentive payout for Agilent’s three business presidents is determined based on select key business initiatives (KBIs) approved by the Compensation Committee.  These KBIs paid out at 71% on average in fiscal year 2017.  Our CEO and CFO were not assigned any KBIs this year and their entire short-term incentive was based on financial targets.

Our Long-Term Performance Plan for the period ended October 31, 2017 paid out at 200% as our three-year relative TSR was at the 78th percentile of our S&P 500 Health Care, Industrials and Materials Indexes peer group.

Stockholder Engagement

While we were pleased with the 96% support for our 2017 Say-on-Pay proposal, we believe ongoing dialog with stockholders regarding our executive pay program is crucial.  

In 2017, we contacted our largest stockholders to solicit their input on our current program and discuss any concerns they may have.  These stockholders reaffirmed their support for our program design and proposal to continue the current program into fiscal year 2018.

Financial Performance Highlights

Year-over-year financial results improved as compared to fiscal year 2016 results:

 

Measure

Fiscal 2016

Fiscal 2017

YOY %

 

 

S&P 500 TSR*

4,045.89

5,002.03

23.6%

 

 

Agilent TSR*

$43.15

$68.03

57.7%

 

 

Revenue (Actual)

$4.2B

$4.5B

6.4%

 

 

Operating Margin (non-GAAP)**

20.4%

21.8%

6.8%

 

 

Diluted EPS

$1.40

$2.10

50.0%

 

 

Diluted EPS (non-GAAP)**

$1.98

$2.36

19.2%

 

*Stock prices shown for fiscal years 2016 and 2017 are as of 10/31/2016 and 10/31/2017 respectively and include reinvested dividends.

**Non-GAAP operating margin and non-GAAP diluted EPS are further defined and reconciled to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures in Appendix A to this proxy statement.

29


Performance and Compensation Highlights

In November 2014, we successfully completed the spin-off of Keysight Technologies, Inc. Mr. Sullivan, our CEO since 2005, retired in March 2015 and remained an executive advisor through fiscal 2015, and Mr. McMullen, our former President and COO, became our CEO as part of our establishedCEO succession plan. Mr. McMullen implemented a new executive leadership team (with the exception of our continuing CFO) to lead Agilent into its next phase of growth, and the three new Business Presidents report directly to Mr. McMullen.

Continuing NEOs and New Compensation Philosophy

Michael McMullen

CEO

Didier Hirsch

CFO

Mark Doak

SVP

Henrik Ancher-Jensen

SVP

Patrick Kaltenbach

SVP



We established the total direct compensation of our new CEO and the new Business Presidentstargeted at the 25th percentile of our peer group, and we expect to increase them to the median over time assuming they perform as expected.

Say On Pay – 60% Approval Last Year

While 60% support from our shareholders is a passing grade, we are disappointed with that result and understand the lack of support for our former CEO’s nonperformance-based retention grant for fiscal 2014 and his retirement grants for fiscal 2015. As a result, we engaged with many of our largest shareholders and in direct response to their feedback, we are makingsignificant changes to our fiscal 2016 program. See “Listening to Our Shareholders”. 

Fiscal 2013 – 2015 LTPP – Pay For Performance

Our Long-Term Performance Plan (“LTPP”) for the period ended October 31, 2015did not pay outas our TSR fell below the 25th percentile of our S&P 500 Information Technology, Health Care and Industrials Sector peer group. This outcome illustrates our commitment to pay for performance.

Financial Objectives and TSR

Year-over-year financial results were approximately the same (excluding Keysight Technologies, Inc. from fiscal 2014 results) and our one-year and three-year TSR was -4.6% and 49.5%, respectively.

CEO Total Direct Compensation

Mr. McMullen
Fiscal 2015: $7,207,852 at the25th percentile of our peer group and over 88% performance based.

Mr. Sullivan (Former CEO)
Fiscal 2015: $6,467,847, a reduction of more than 50% from FY14, with over90% performance based. Fiscal 2014: $13,914,733.


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


ListeningCorrelation of CEO Compensation to Our ShareholdersCompany Performance

Agilent has historically received over 90% shareholder support

The chart below demonstrates how the historical compensation of our CEO compares to our three-year indexed TSR.  The TSR shown below assumes reinvestment of the Keysight spin-off dividend on our “Say-on-Pay” proposals alongNovember 3rd, 2014, the ex-dividend date, not the end of the month or the quarter, as some reporting agencies may use.

Aligning CEO and NEO Pay with support from the major shareholder advisory firms. However, early in 2015 the major shareholder advisory firms recommended an AGAINST vote on ourPerformance

For fiscal year 2014 Say on Pay proposal. In response, our Compensation Committee Chair2017, approximately 88% of Mr. McMullen’s and members of management met with 1581% of our largest shareholders who own more than 40%other NEOs’ total direct compensation consisted of Agilent’s outstanding sharesshort-term and long-term incentives and was “at-risk”— which means that this component can vary year to hear their concerns. Whileyear depending on the performance of the company and our Say on Pay proposal passed with 60% shareholder support, we were disappointed with this result and commenced a full review of our programs. We considered the invaluable feedback received from shareholders in this review, including the following recommendations:stock price performance.  

CEO

Incorporate a balance sheet metric such as ROIC into the executive compensation program to focus management on efficient use of capital
NEO

Change the short-term incentive plan with semi-annual payouts to an annual plan with a single year-end payout to align incentives with annual business results

Reduce the use of stock options for long-term awards

Add a financial performance metric to the long-term incentive plan to create greater line of sight for executives rather than rely solely on relative TSR

Consider additional limits on long-term awards, such as post-vest holding periods, to further strengthen executive alignment with shareholders

Following these meetings, the Compensation Committee, Frederic W. Cook (the independent Compensation Committee Consultant), and Agilent Management considered the feedback received from shareholders and proposed a number of changes to our executive compensation programs for fiscal year 2016. In August, we extended an invitation to many of our largest shareholders to preview our proposed program design changes for fiscal year 2016. Our Compensation Committee Chair and30




Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Stockholder Outreach

We received a 96% stockholder support on our 2017 Say-on-Pay proposal, along with support from the major stockholder advisory firms. While pleased with these results, our Compensation Committee and members of management met againbelieve ongoing dialog with 8stockholders regarding executive compensation is crucial. In 2017, we communicated with many of our largest shareholders who acceptedstockholders to recap the changes made for fiscal year 2017 and discuss our invitation. The feedback onstrategy for fiscal year 2018. Stockholders affirmed our proposals was positiveexecutive compensation program and shareholders feltsupported our plan to maintain the current design for fiscal year 2018.

Fiscal Year 2017 Program Changes

For fiscal year 2017, we addressed many of their concerns. In September,made two changes to our program that further strengthens the Compensation Committee approved the design changes outlinedlink between executive compensation and company growth.  First, we replaced ROIC with operating margin in the following tableshort-term incentive plan to take effectkeep executives focused on improving operating efficiency and converting our strong revenue growth into higher profits.  Second, we replaced operating margin with EPS in fiscal year 2016.the long-term incentive plan to directly link executive rewards with stockholder value creation and superior long-term earnings growth.  

Determining Executive Pay

Our executive pay decisions are grounded in a core philosophy that applies to all elements of compensation. Our compensation philosophy is intended to:

Align executive interests with stockholders;

Support our short- and long-term business strategy;

Program

FY15 Design

FY16 DesignDeliver competitive total direct compensation targeted, in aggregate, around the 50th percentile of our peers to attract, retain and motivate the best employees; and

Provide pay for performance.

The following principal elements of compensation are provided under our executive compensation program:

 

Performance Period

Semi-Annual

AnnualElements of Pay

Primary Financial MetricsBase Pay

OM / Revenue✓ Baseline for competitive total compensation.

ROIC / Revenue

 

Stock Options
(Time-Based Vesting)

50%✓ Normally 20% or less of target LTI value

n/atotal direct compensation for NEOs.

LTPP Shares
(Relative TSR)Short-Term Incentives

50% of target LTI value✓ Focuses executives on critical operating and strategic goals best measured annually.

30% of target LTI value✓ Provides downside risk for underperformance and upside reward for success.

✓ Leverages financial measures such as revenue and operating margin, supplemented with select strategic initiatives.

LTPP Shares
(Financial Metric:
OM for FY16)Long-Term Incentives

n/a

30%✓ Performance pay representing the majority of NEO target LTIcompensation.

✓ Motivates and rewards multi-year stockholder value creation.

RSUs
(Time-Based Vesting) 

n/a

40% of target LTI value

One Year Post-Vest
Holding Period 

None

Apply to LTPP and RSUs

Payout Caps

✓ 2X cap on LTPP shares
Facilitates executive stock ownership.

✓ No cap on LTPP payout
dollar value

Lower of:
Enables retention.

✓ 2X cap on # of LTPP shares

✓  3X cap on LTPP payout
dollar value

Agilent’s Fiscal 2015 Financial Performance Compared to Fiscal 2014

Fiscal 2014
(Restated)

Fiscal 2015
Total Shareholder Return (1-Year)9.93%-4.56%
Total Shareholder Return (3-Year)53.26%49.51%
Revenue (Target / Actual)$4.14B / $4.05B$4.21B / $4.04B
     Results as a Percentage of Target98%96%
Operating Margin (Target / Actual)20% / 19%19% / 19%
     Results as a Percentage of Target96%100%

Fiscal year 2014 numbers exclude Keysight Technologies




Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Aligning CEO Pay with Performance

Aligning CEO pay with company performance and shareholder value creation is a core tenet of our program. As the following chart illustrates, our CEO’s compensation tracks appropriately when compared to our absolute TSR over the past 5 years.

2011-2014 data represents Mr. Sullivan’s CEO pay; 2015 data represents Mr. McMullen’s CEO pay

Agilent began FY15 as a standalone life sciences company having just completed the spin-off of Keysight Technologies, which we believe was in the best interest of shareholders. While we are disappointed that our FY15 absolute TSR was slightly negative, we are executing on a multi-year financial plan to accelerate our organic revenue growth, increase our operating margins, return greater than 85% of free cash to shareholders and implement our Agile Agilent program to streamline and simplify the company.

The Agilent stock price started fiscal year 2015 at a premium for a number of reasons including anticipation of the spinoff of Keysight Technologies, strategic optionality speculation, shareholder churn and premium associated with the broader rise of the S&P 500 health care sector. As the year went on, the stock price premium slowly dissipated despite our strong FY15 financial results, which included year over year revenue growth above market, Agilent’s highest revenue growth in the last four years, and increased adjusted operating margins. Nonetheless, these financial results translated into a slightly below target short-term financial incentive payout. Meanwhile, the company’s strong performance resulted in our CEO receiving just over 100% of his overall target short-term incentive payout, when including the weighted average payout of the strategic objectives.However, as the chart above indicates, our total CEO compensation has declined by approximately 50 percent, and our FY13-FY15 LTPP payout was zero percent given the relative performance of our stock.



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Pay Practices

Our executive compensation program is supported by a set of strong governance provisions and pay practices.

We structure compensation to create a strong alignment with shareholder interests
●   Majority of pay is delivered via performance-based vehicles such as long-termDelivered through performance shares and annual cash incentives

●   AddingRSUs, both with a mandatory one-year post-vest holding period on Annual LTI awards beginning in fiscal year 2016
We designperiod.

✓ Performance measures include long-term financial objectives and the relative performance of our programs to avoid excessive risk taking

●   Strong recoupment and anti-hedging policies in place

●   Robust stock ownership guidelines

●   Annual compensation risk assessment
We follow best practices in executive compensation design
●   Limited perquisites

●   No single trigger on change in control benefit provisions or new tax gross-ups

●   No dividends / dividend-equivalents on unearned performance awards

●   Continued vesting of equity awards and earn out of LTPP shares based on performance (rather than acceleration of target) upon retirement

●   Independent Compensation Committee Consultant

Compensation Philosophy

The main objectives of our executive compensation program are topay for performancewhilealigning executives’ interests with shareholder interests. Our pay levels are reasonable and competitive to attract and retain the best talent and structure pay to support our business objectives with appropriate rewards for short-term operating results and long-term shareholder value creation. Accordingly, we structure our executive compensation program with three basic direct elements:

Base Salary.Base salaries have historically accounted for 20% or less of total compensation for our NEOs. This element is intended to establish the minimum or base-line competitive compensation level that sits beneath the variable compensation components. The remaining 80% or more of our total compensation is performance-based as described below.

Short-Term Cash Incentives.For fiscal year 2015, we used financial metrics such asrevenue growth and operating profit percentage, as well as strategic objectives, to determine our short-term cash performance incentives. The short-term incentives are used to provide a competitive element of total direct compensation and to focus the efforts of our executives on critical operating and strategic goals that are best measured within annual periods, where there is downside risk for underperforming and upside reward for success.

Long-Term Incentives. For fiscal year 2015, our long-term incentives consist of a combination of (1) stock options that vest over four years and have a 10-year term and (2) performance shares that vest at the end of a three-year period based on continued employment and our relative TSR versus peer companies. The purpose of the long-term incentives is to provide a competitive element of total direct compensation, enable employment retention, facilitate executive stock ownership, andreward for multi-year shareholder value creation through the performance of our stock as measured against (1) historical prices and (2) the shareholder return of our peers.



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSISstock.


Our actual total compensation for each NEO varies based on (i) company performance measured against external metrics that correlate to long-term stockholder value, (ii) performance of the business organizations against specific targets, and (iii) individual performance. These three factors are considered in positioning salaries, determining earned short-term incentives and determining long-term incentive grant values.

Compensation Risk Controls31

F.W. Cook conducts an annual review of Agilent’s compensation related risks. The risk assessment conducted during fiscal year 2015 confirmed that Agilent’s executive compensation program iswell designed to encourage behaviors aligned with the long-term interests of shareholders. F.W. Cook also found an appropriate balance in fixed versus variable pay, cash and equity, corporate, business unit, and individual goals, financial and non-financial performance measures, and formulas and discretion. Finally, it was determined that there are appropriate policies and controls in place to mitigate compensation-related risk, as set forth below:


Recoupment Policy

We have adopted an Executive Compensation Recoupment Policy that applies to all of our executive officers covered by Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act. Under this Policy, in the event of (A) a material restatement of financial results (wherein results were incorrect at the time published due to mistake, fraud or other misconduct), or (B) fraud or misconduct by an executive officer, the Compensation Committee will, in the case of a restatement, review all short and long-term incentive compensation awards that were paid or awarded to executive officers for performance periods beginning after July 14, 2009 that occurred, in whole or in part, during the restatement period. In the case of fraud or misconduct, the Committee will consider actions to remedy the misconduct, prevent its recurrence, and impose discipline on the wrongdoers, in each case, as the Committee deems appropriate.

These actions may include, without limitation:

requiring reimbursement of compensation,
the cancellation of outstanding restricted stock or deferred stock awards, stock options, and other equity incentive awards, limiting future awards or compensation, and
requiring the disgorgement of profits realized from the sale of Agilent stock to the extent such profit resulted from fraud or misconduct.

Hedging and Insider
Trading Policy

Our insider trading policy expressly prohibits:

ownership of financial instruments or participation in investment strategies that hedge the economic risk of owning Agilent stock
officers and directors from pledging Agilent securities as collateral for loans
officers, directors and employees from purchasing or selling Agilent securities while in possession of material, non-public information, or otherwise using such information for their personal benefit.

Our executives and directors are permitted to enter into trading plans that are intended to comply with the requirements of Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act so that they can prudently diversify their asset portfolios and exercise their stock options before expiration.



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Pay Practices

Our executive compensation program is supported by a set of strong governance provisions and pay practices.

 Stock Ownership
 Guidelines

Philosophy / Practice

Result

We structure compensation to create strong alignment with stockholder interests

Our

✓    Majority of pay is delivered via performance-based vehicles such as long-term performance shares and annual cash incentives.

✓    Robust stock ownership guidelines are designed to encourage our NEOs and other executive officers to achieve and maintain a significant equity stake in Agilent and more closely align their interests with those of our stockholders. The guidelines provide that the CEO, COO, CFO and other executive officers should accumulate and hold, within five years from election to his or her position, an investment level in our stock equal to a multiple of his or herguidelines.

✓    Mandatory one-year post-vest holding period on annual base salary or accumulate a direct ownership of Agilent stock as set forth below:

LTI awards.

We design our programs to avoid excessive risk taking (1)

✓    Strong recoupment and anti-hedging policies in place.

✓    Annual compensation risk assessment.

✓    Balanced internal and external goals.

We follow best practices in executive compensation design

Investment Level =Direct Ownership

✓    Limited perquisites.

✓    Double trigger on change in control benefit provisions and no new tax gross-up agreements.

✓    No dividends / dividend-equivalents on unearned performance awards and unvested stock awards.

✓    No acceleration of

Multiple vesting of AnnualAgilent Stock
ExecutiveBase Salary(# of Shares)
CEO6XN/A
CFO/COO3X80,000
All other executive officers3X40,000
An annual review is conducted to assess compliance with the guidelines. By the end of fiscal year 2015, all of our NEOs had either metequity awards or were on track to reach their stock ownership guideline requirements within the applicable timeframe.LTPP shares upon retirement.

✓    Independent Compensation Committee consultant.


Determining Executive Pay

Process for Determining(1)  See Compensation Risk Controls in Additional Information

For fiscal year 2015,Independent Compensation Committee and Consultant

The Compensation Committee is composed solely of independent members of the Board and operates under a Board-approved charter which outlines the Committee’s major duties and responsibilities. This charter is available on our Investor Relations website.

In May 2017, the Compensation Committee retained F.W. Cookhired Semler Brossy as its new independent compensation consultant.consultant, replacing F.W. Cook performs noCook.  Our independent compensation consultant does not perform any other work for Agilent,us, does not trade Agilentour stock, has an Independence Policyindependence policies that isare reviewed annually by F.W. Cook’stheir Board of Directors, and will proactively notifiesnotify the Compensation Committee chair of any potential or perceived conflicts of interest. The Compensation Committee found no conflict of interest with F.W. Cookeither independent compensation consultant during fiscal year 2015.2017.

For fiscal year 2017, our independent compensation consultants advised the Compensation Committee on several compensation matters, including but not limited to:

Criteria used to identify peer companies for executive compensation and performance metrics;

Evaluation of our total direct compensation levels and mix for the NEOs and four other senior officers;

Mix of long-term incentives, grant types and allocation of equity awards;

Review of the short- and long-term incentive programs for fiscal year 2018;

Review of various other proposals presented to the Compensation Committee by management; and

Support for stockholder outreach campaign.

32


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Process for Determining Compensation

To determine total target compensation for the upcoming fiscal year, the Compensation Committee considers 1) considered:

the performance of each individual executive for the last fiscal year, 2) year;

the most recent peer group data from F.W. Cook, 3) our independent compensation consultant;

our short-and long-term business and strategic goals for the coming fiscal yeargoals; and 4)

detailed tally sheets for the CEO and each NEO. F.W. Cook

Our independent compensation consultant presents and analyzes market data for benchmarking each individual position and provides insight toon market practices for the Compensation Committee’s actions, but it does not make any specific compensation recommendations on the individual NEOs. The Compensation Committee determines the form and amount of compensation for all executive officers after considering the market data and company, business unit and individual performance.

Peer Group for Executive Compensation

Each year, the Compensation Committee meets with our independent compensation consultant to review and approve the peer group companies that satisfy our selection criteria. For fiscal year 2015, F.W. Cook advised2017, our compensation peer group consisted of the 30 companies listed below from the S&P 500 Health Care Index with revenues between 0.25x and 2.5x times our projected revenue, supplemented with two of our most direct competitors (Thermo Fisher and Danaher). The range of annual revenues for peer group members was determined so that our annual revenue would be around the median of the peer group. We used data from this peer group to set each NEO’s compensation for fiscal year 2017, with aggregate compensation targeted at around the peer group median.  

Alexion Pharma

Cerner

Lab Corp of America

Stryker

Baxalta

Danaher

Mallinckrodt

Thermo Fisher

Baxter Intl

DENTSPLY Sirona

Mylan NV

Varian Medical Systems

Becton, Dickinson

Edwards Lifesciences

Perkin Elmer

Waters

Biogen

Endo

Perrigo

Zimmer

Boston Scientific

Hologic

Quest Diagnostics

Zoetis

C. R. Bard

Illumina

Regeneron Pharma

Celgene

Intuitive Surgical

St. Jude Medical

Peer Group for the Long-Term Performance Program

The Compensation Committee believes that an expanded peer group is more appropriate for determining relative TSR under the company’s LTPP, as an expanded peer group provides a broader index for comparison. Therefore, the Compensation Committee on a number of compensation matters, including but not limited to:

Criteria used to identify peer companies for executive compensation and performance metrics;

Evaluation of our total direct compensation levels and mix for the NEOs and four other senior officers;

Mix of long-term incentives, grant types and allocation of stock options and full value shares;

Reviewing various other proposals presented to the Compensation Committee by management;

Guidance on CEO transition planning; and

Support for shareholder outreach campaign.

The Compensation Committee, which is composed solely of independent membersuses the approximately 85 companies in the Health Care and Materials Indexes of the Board, operatesS&P 500 for determining TSR under a Board-approved charterthe LTPP. Only companies that spells outare included in one of these indexes at the Committee’s major dutiesbeginning of the performance period and responsibilities. This charterwhich have three years of stock price performance at the end of the performance period are included in the final calculation of results. Any change in the expanded peer group is available on Agilent’s website at http://www.investor.agilent.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=103274&p=irol-govhighlights.solely due to Standard & Poor’s criteria for inclusion in the indexes.



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Role of Management

The CEO and the Senior Vice President, Human Resources consider the responsibilities, performance and capabilities of each of the Company’sour named executive officers, including the NEOs, other than the CEO, and whatthe compensation package they believe will attract, retain and motivate. The Senior Vice President, Human Resources does not provide input on setting his own compensation. A comprehensive analysis is conducted using a combination of the market data based on our compensation peer group and surveyproxy data, performance against targets, and overall performance assessment. This data and analysis is used as the primary consideration to determine if an increase in compensation is warranted and the amount and type of any increase for each of the total compensation components for the then-current fiscal year. After consulting with the Senior Vice President, Human Resources, the CEO makes compensation recommendations, other than for his own compensation, to the Compensation Committee at theits first Compensation Committee meeting of the fiscal year.

Benchmarking33

NEO Compensation Peer Group

At the beginning of each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee meets with F.W. Cook to review and approve the peer group companies that satisfy our selection criteria. We revised the peer group used for setting fiscal year 2015 NEO compensation given the spin-off of Keysight Technologies. For fiscal year 2015, our peer group for NEO compensation consisted of 29 product, capital market and labor market competitors in the S&P 500 Health Care Sector with revenues between 0.25x and 2.5x times Agilent’s projected revenue, supplemented with two of our most direct competitors (Thermo Fisher and Danaher). The range of annual revenues for peer group members was determined so that Agilent’s size measured in annual revenue would be at the median of the peer group. F.W. Cook used the compensation information reported in the public filings of our peer group companies and survey data to make our comparisons and adjusted the data to reflect the age of the reported information. We used this peer group data,targeting the market median, to set each NEO’s compensation for fiscal year 2015.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 NEO COMPENSATION PEER GROUP

Agilent’s peer group for setting fiscal year 2015 NEO compensation consists of the following 31 companies.


ActavisCelgeneIntuitive SurgicalStryker
Alexion PharmaCernerLab Corp of AmericaThermo Fisher
AllerganCovidienMylanVarian Medical Systems
Bard (C.R.)DanaherPerkinElmerVertex Pharmaceutical
Becton, DickinsonDENTSPLY IntlPerrigoWaters
Biogen IdecEdwards LifesciencesQuest DiagnosticsZimmer Holdings
Boston ScientificForest LabsRegeneron PharmaZoetis
CareFusionHospiraSt. Jude Medical

Peer Group for the Long-Term Performance Program

The Compensation Committee believes that an expanded peer group is more appropriate for determining relative TSR under the Company’s LTPP, as an expanded peer group provides a broader index for comparison and better alignment with shareholder investment choices. Therefore, the Compensation Committee uses the companies inthe S&P 500, Health Care, Materials and Industrials Sectors Indexes (approximately 150 companies) for determining TSR under the LTPP. Only companies that are included in one of these sectors at the beginning of the performance period



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


and have 3 years of stock price performance at the end of the performance period are included in the final calculation of results. The S&P 500 constituent list is maintained by the S&P Index Committee, which is available at www.standardandpoors.com/indices/main/en/us. Any change in the expanded peer group is solely due to Standard & Poor’s criteria for inclusion in the index.

CEO Compensation

The Compensation Committee establishes the CEO’s compensation based on a thorough review of the CEO’s performance that includes: (i) an

An objective assessment against agreed-topredetermined metrics set by the Compensation Committee; (ii) tally sheets, (iii) market

Tally sheets;

Market data from F.W. Cook, (iv) aour independent compensation consultant;

A self-evaluation by the CEO that the Compensation Committee discusses with the independent directors; and (v) a

A qualitative evaluation of the CEO’s performance that is developed by the independent directors, including each member of the Compensation Committee, in executive session.

The Compensation Committee reviews the CEO’s total direct compensation package is reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee, which thenand presents its recommendation to the other independent directors for review and comment. The Compensation Committee then makescomment before making the final determinations on compensation for the CEO.

Fiscal Year 20152017 Compensation

For fiscal year 2015, approximately88% of Mr. McMullen’s and 84% of our NEOs’ total direct compensation consisted of short-term and long-term incentives and is “at-risk”— which means that this component can vary year to year depending on company and Agilent’s stock price performance.

CEO

Other Named Executive Officers (Average)



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


A Year in Transition

In FY15, Bill Sullivan retired after 10 years of being CEO and was succeeded by Mr. McMullen. In determining FY15 CEO compensation, the Committee considered Mr. Sullivan’s planned retirement and role as advisor to Mr. McMullen and the Board for the remainder of the year. The Committee followed its compensation philosophy in settingMr. McMullen’s CEO compensation near the 25th percentile of the peer group.

Mr. SullivanMr. McMullen
CEO2015YOY%CEOCEO YOY
2014Change2015% Change
Base Salary$1,050,000$630,000-40.0%$845,833-19.4%
Short-Term Incentive
       (non-equity)$1,631,089$894,285-45.2%$1,110,963-31.9%
Performance Shares /
       Restricted Stock$6,632,830$3,057,116-53.9%$2,520,205-62.0%
Stock Options$4,569,033$1,946,094-57.4%$2,434,524-46.7%
Total$13,882,952$6,527,495-53.0%$6,911,525-50.2%
 

All data from Summary Compensation Table. Mr. McMullen and Mr. Sullivan did not receive any restricted stock in fiscal year 2015


Base Salary

Our salaries reflect the responsibilities of each NEO and the competitive market for comparable professionals in our industry and are set to create an incentive for executives to remain with Agilent.us. Base salaries and benefits packages are the fixed components of our NEOs’ compensation and do not vary with company performance. Each NEOs’ base salaries aresalary is set by considering benchmark market data as well as the performance of eachsuch NEO. In aggregate, we target market 50For fiscal year 2017, our NEO base salaries ranged between the 25th and 75th percentile of our compensation peer group for base salaries.For fiscal year 2015, NEO base salaries were on average between the 25th and 35th percentile. We believe this positioning is appropriate as the majority of our NEOs were new to their positions in 2015.group.  

In November 2014, the Compensation Committee increased the base salary for Messrs. Doak and Ancher-Jensen from $400,000 to $425,000 and $386,000 to $400,000 respectively, to compensate them appropriately against their respective peers. Mr. Kaltenbach received a salary increase from $348,000 to $475,000 for his promotion to Senior Vice President. Since Mr. Kaltenbach was on the German payroll during fiscal year 2015, this amount was converted to his local currency (Euro) on December 1, 2014. As a result, his local currency base salary is 379,905 Euro. Mr. McMullen received a salary increase in March 2015 from $700,000 to $950,000 to reflect his promotion to CEO. Mr. Sullivan’s base salary for the fiscal year decreased 40% from $1,050,000 to $630,000 to reflect his part-time status after serving as CEO from November 1, 2014 to March 17, 2015.

Name

FY16 Salary

FY17 Salary

Increase

 

Michael R. McMullen

$1,050,000

$1,100,000

5%

 

Didier Hirsch

$600,000

$630,000

5%

 

Mark Doak

$475,000

$525,000

11%

 

Patrick Kaltenbach

$500,000

$535,000

7%

 

Jacob Thaysen

$440,000

$500,000

14%

 

Short-Term Cash Incentives

The Performance-Based Compensation Plan appliesreflects our pay-for-performance philosophy and directly ties short-term incentives to our NEOs and for fiscal year 2015, provided the opportunity for cashshort-term business performance. These awards every six monthsare linked to specific six-monthannual financial goals and annual strategic goalskey business initiatives for the overall company and the three business groups (LSAG, ACG and DGG).Effective fiscal year 2016, the short-term incentive program will change to an annual program with a single payout at year end. Annual cash incentives are paid to reward achievement of critical shorter-term operating, financial and strategic measures and goals that are expected to contribute to shareholderstockholder value creation over time. Financial goals for each six-month period are pre-established by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of the period, based on recommendations from management. The financial goals are based on Agilent’sour fiscal year 2015



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


2017 financial plan established by the Board of Directors. AfterDirectors and cannot be changed after they have been approved by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee certifies the calculations of performance against the goals for each period and payouts, if any, are made in cash. Metrics and goals cannot be changed after they have been approved by the Compensation Committee. The Performance-Based Compensation Plan reflects our pay-for-performance philosophy anddirectly ties short-term incentives to short-term business performance.

For fiscal year 2015,2017, the awards under the Performance-Based Compensation Plan were calculateddetermined by multiplying the individual’s base salary for the performance period by the individual’s target award percentage and the performance determinedresults, as follows:

H1Annual
Salary / 2
Individual Target Bonus
(varies by individual)
Financial Portion
of Target Bonus
(0% to 100%)
Attainment %
(based on actual
performance)
FinancialXXX
H2
Financial
FY
Strategic

  Financial Goals

Annual
Salary

X

Individual Target Bonus
(varies % (varies by individual)

X

Strategic

Financial Portion

Attainment %
XXof Target Bonus
(75% to 100%)

X

Attainment %
(based on actual performance)

  Key Business
    Initiatives

Annual Salary

X

Individual Target Bonus % (varies by individual)

X

Strategic Portion of Target Bonus
(0% to 25%)

X

Attainment %
(based on actual
performance)


34


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Target Award Percentages and FY17 Actual Payouts

Our Compensation Committee set the fiscal year 2017 short-term incentive target amounts based on a percent of base salary pre-established for each NEO considering the relative responsibility of each NEO.  For fiscal year 2017, short-term incentive target bonuses were set at 130% of base salary for the CEO and 80% of base salary for the other NEOs.

The payouts under the Performance-Based Compensation Plan for fiscal year 20152017 are provided in the tablechart below and in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column in the “Summary Compensation Table”.

Annual FY15Target Short-
First Half FY15Second Half FY15StrategicObjectivesTerm IncentiveActual Short-Term
TargetActualTargetActualTargetActualfor the FiscalIncentives Paid for
IncentiveAwardIncentiveAwardIncentiveAwardYearthe Fiscal Year
Name   ($)   ($)   ($)   ($)   ($)   ($)   ($)   ($)
Michael R. McMullen$368,078$344,373 $427,500$427,500$265,349$339,090$1,060,927 $1,110,963
Didier Hirsch $180,000$168,408$180,000 $180,000$120,000 $168,000 $480,000$516,408
Mark Doak$127,500 $131,719$127,500$132,728$85,000$157,250$340,000$421,697 
Henrik Ancher-Jensen$120,000$126,396$120,000$112,122 $80,000 $120,000$320,000$358,518
Patrick Kaltenbach$121,534$120,112$125,439$115,459$82,337$76,161$329,310$311,732
William P. Sullivan$787,500$736,785$157,500$157,500$0$0$945,000$894,285

Mr. McMullen’s fiscal year 2015 bonus of $1,110,963 reflects our slightly belowTable.” The overall payout percent compared to target fiscal year 2015 financial results andis shown above target performance for Mr. McMullen’s strategic objectives for the fiscal year. Mr. Sullivan’s final year bonus of $894,285 reflects his reduced base salary and our slightly below target fiscal year 2015 financial results. Mr. Sullivan was not assigned any strategic objectives for fiscal year 2015.actual columns.

Target Award Percentages

Our Compensation Committee set the monetary value of the fiscal year 2015 short-term incentive targets based on a percent of base salary pre-established for each NEO. The Compensation Committee also considered the relative responsibility of each NEO. In aggregate,we target market 50th percentile of our peer group, and in fiscal year 2015 our NEO’s short-term incentive target bonus was set between 80% and 150% of base salary (depending on position).

Financial Target MetricsGoals and Fiscal Year 20152017 Operational Results

The Performance-Based Compensation Plan financial target metricsgoals were based on (1) Agilent’s Operating Marginour operating margin percentage and Agilent’sour revenue goals for Mr. McMullen, Mr. Hirsch and Mr. Sullivan at 100% and Messrs. Doak, Ancher-Jensen and Kaltenbach at 50%, (2) the other 50% is tied to the respective



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


business unit’s Operating Marginadjusted operating margin percentage and revenue goals for Messrs. Doak and Kaltenbach, and (3) Agilent Gross Margin Percentage and Agilent’s revenue goals for the other 50% of Mr. Ancher-Jensen’s financial target bonus for each of the first half and second half of fiscal year 2015.

business units.  The Compensation Committee chose those metrics because:

Revenue places focus on our continued growth; and

Operating Margin and Gross Margin both emphasize innovation, profitability and efficiency in our core business operations.

operating margin keeps focus on expense discipline and meeting efficiency measures; and

revenue places focus on delivering strong top-line growth results.

The Compensation Committee sets the financial targets that must be met to receive the target payout are based on the company’sour business plan, which establishes higher financial goals than external guidance provided to shareholders.plan.

35


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

To determine earned awards, we use payout matrices (as described below) that link the metrics and reflect threshold-to-maximum opportunities based on various achievement levels of the metrics. No awards are paid unless the Operating Margin or Gross Marginoperating margin percentage threshold is achieved. Theachieved and the maximum award under the plan is capped at 200% of the target award. The target metrics set for our short-term incentives and their corresponding results were as follows:

First Half FY15
Operating Margin / Gross Margin %Revenue
                           Payout %
 GoalTargetMaxResultsGoal(Per
ThresholdTargetMaxResultsAttainment(Mil)(Mil)(Mil)AttainmentMatrix)
         Agilent         13.0%17.7%21.5%17.3%98%  $2,071$2,278$1,98996%94%
LSAG & ACG14.2%18.8%22.5%19.1%102%$1,728$1,901$1,67297%104%
ACG15.7%20.1%23.8%21.1%105%$662$728$65299%113%
OFS54.6%56.2%57.4%56.6%101%$1,648$1,813$1,57996%117%

Second Half FY15
Operating Margin / Gross Margin %Revenue
                           Payout %
 GoalTargetMaxResultsGoal(Per
ThresholdTargetMaxResultsAttainment(Mil)(Mil)(Mil)AttainmentMatrix)
         Agilent        16.1%20.5%24.1%20.6%100%$2,144$2,359$2,04996%100%
LSAG15.9%20.3%23.9%19.4%96%$1,081$1,189$1,02695%84%
ACG19.0%23.1%26.5%23.9%103%$698$768$67897%108%
OFS56.3%57.7%58.8%57.5%100%$1,703$1,874$1,61795%87%

Notes: 

 

 

 

Operating Margin %

 

Revenue $

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Max

Results

Goal

Attainment

 

Target

(Mil)

 

Max

(Mil)

 

Results

(Mil)

Goal

Attainment

Payout Percentage

(Per Matrix)

 

Agilent

 

18.0%

 

22.0%

 

24.2%

22.3%

102%

 

$4,364

 

$4,582

 

$4,453

102%

111%

 

LSAG

 

18.0%

 

22.0%

 

24.2%

22.5%

103%

 

$2,106

 

$2,211

 

$2,165

103%

120%

 

ACG

 

18.1%

 

22.1%

 

24.3%

22.3%

101%

 

$1,497

 

$1,572

 

$1,527

102%

107%

 

DGG

 

16.4%

 

20.0%

 

22.0%

20.2%

101%

 

$760

 

$798

 

$761

100%

105%

There are no thresholds for Revenue metrics.

Operating Margin (segment level) is a non-GAAP measure defined as revenue less the sum of cost of products and services, research and development expense and selling, general and administrative expenses.

Payout Matrices to Measure Financial Metrics

Agilent used the followingWe use payout matrices to determine payout percentages for our FY15fiscal year 2017 short-term incentive program. The payout matrices are designed toreward profitable growth by increasing payout percentages commensurate with increased operating margin achievement rather than increasedand / or revenue achievement onceas illustrated in the revenue target is met.table below.

 

 

 

 

FY17 - Revenue Achievement (% of plan)

 

 

 

 

 

0 - 90%

 

96.0%

 

100.0%

 

103.0%

 

105.0%

 

 

110%

 

120.00%

 

138.00%

 

150.00%

 

180.00%

 

200.00%

 

FY17 - OM

105%

 

105.00%

 

117.00%

 

125.00%

 

140.00%

 

150.00%

 

Achievement

100%

 

90.00%

 

96.00%

 

100.00%

 

100.00%

 

100.00%

 

(% of plan)

90%

 

45.56%

 

49.89%

 

52.78%

 

54.44%

 

55.56%

 

 

82%

 

10.00%

 

13.00%

 

15.00%

 

18.00%

 

20.00%

 

Note:  This specific payout matrix was used to determine the company level payout percentage. The payout percentages arepercentage is determined by finding the intersection between the goal attainments as a percentage of plan for each financial metric. Payout percentages are assigned to each intersection of OMrevenue and Revenueoperating margin percentage throughout the payout matrix. These specific matrices were usedPayouts between the numbers represented in the table above are calculated on a linear payout matrix and the threshold amount for operating margin percentage must be met in order for a payout to determine the Agilent level payout percentages.be made. Payout matrices vary by business group.



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


H1 FY15 - Revenue (% of plan)
 0 - 90%92%94%96%98%100%102%104%106%108%110%
 121%120.00%126.00%132.00%138.00%144.00%150.00%166.67%183.33%200.00%200.00%200.00%
118%117.14%122.29%127.43%132.57%137.71%142.86%160.07%179.05%185.72%185.72%185.72%
114%113.33%117.33%121.33%125.33%129.33%133.33%151.28%166.67%166.67%166.67%166.67%
110%109.52%112.38%115.24%118.10%120.95%123.81%142.49%147.62%147.62%147.62%147.62%
106%105.71%107.43%109.14%110.86%112.57%114.29%128.58%128.58%128.58%128.58%128.58%
102%101.90%102.48%103.05%103.62%104.19%104.76%109.53%109.53%109.53%109.53%109.53%
100%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%
98%93.33%93.41%93.48%93.56%93.63%93.70%93.70%93.70%93.70%93.70%93.70%
96%86.67%86.81%86.96%87.11%87.26%87.41%87.41%87.41%87.41%87.41%87.41%
88%60.00%60.44%60.89%61.33%61.78%62.22%62.22%62.22%62.22%62.22%62.22%
80%33.33%34.07%34.81%35.56%36.30%37.04%37.04%37.04%37.04%37.04%37.04%
73%10.00%11.00%12.00%13.00%14.00%15.00%15.00%15.00%15.00%15.00%15.00%

H2 FY15 - Revenue (% of plan)
 0 - 90%92%94%96%98%100%102%104%106%108%110%
118%120.00%126.00%132.00%138.00%144.00%150.00%170.00%190.00%200.00%200.00%200.00%
116%117.78%123.11%128.44%133.78%139.11%144.44%164.89%188.89%188.89%188.89%188.89%
112%113.33%117.33%121.33%125.33%129.33%133.33%154.66%166.67%166.67%166.67%166.67%
108%108.89%111.56%114.22%116.89%119.56%122.22%144.44%144.44%144.44%144.44%144.44%
104%104.44%105.78%107.11%108.44%109.78%111.11%122.22%122.22%122.22%122.22%122.22%
100%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%
96%82.86%83.05%83.24%83.43%83.62%83.81%83.81%83.81%83.81%83.81%83.81%
92%65.71%66.10%66.48%66.86%67.24%67.62%67.62%67.62%67.62%67.62%67.62%
88%48.57%49.14%49.71%50.29%50.86%51.43%51.43%51.43%51.43%51.43%51.43%
84%31.43%32.19%32.95%33.71%34.48%35.24%35.24%35.24%35.24%35.24%35.24%
80%14.29%15.24%16.19%17.14%18.10%19.05%19.05%19.05%19.05%19.05%19.05%
79%10.00%11.00%12.00%13.00%14.00%15.00%15.00%15.00%15.00%15.00%15.00%

Tables have been simplified for illustrative purposes, but the actual payout percentages are shown.

Strategic Component

Key Business Initiatives – Targets and Fiscal Year 2015 Results

For fiscal year 2015,2017, under the Performance-Based Compensation Plan, we continued to utilizeannual strategic goalskey business initiatives to align each continuing NEO’sNEOs’ objectives withstrategic company priorities. The strategic component ispriorities. These key business initiatives are established withinat the same time prescribed by Section 162(m) ofas the Internal Revenue Codefinancial goals and is determined on an annual basis. The strategic component accountsaccount for 25% of the total target bonus for each NEO who was assigned strategic objectives.to key business initiatives. The maximum payout per NEO for satisfaction of the strategic component is the lesser of (1)(i) up to 200% of strategic objectivekey business initiative performance results or (2)(ii) 0.75% of non-GAAP pre-tax earnings for the Company, and the Compensation Committee may exercise negative discretion toin determining the maximum payout to determine the strategic award percentage. The percentage of non-GAAP pre-tax earnings increased this year from 0.50% to 0.75% due to the smaller company size after the Keysight spin-off.final payout.

Non-GAAP pre-tax earnings is defined as earnings before income taxes that exclude primarily the impact of acquisition and integration costs, restructuring costs, transformational initiatives, non-cash intangibles amortization as well as business exit and divestiture costs.36




Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Fiscal year 2015 strategic objectivesThe key business initiatives were selected to focus NEOs on key business initiativesstrategic priorities such asrevenue growth in specific markets and products, company-wide gross margin expansion, streamlined and more efficient operations,customer satisfaction scores and regulatory compliance.compliance. The following table describessets forth (i) each strategic objective, including thekey business initiative and its threshold, target and maximum achievement levels, for each, identifies(ii) the NEOs who were assigned to each strategic objective,key business initiative, and reports(iii) the final attainment and payout percentage for each objective. If an NEO is assigned to more than one objective, the weighting is equally distributed.  For fiscal year 2017, Mr. McMullen and Mr. Hirsch were not assigned to any key business initiatives.  For competitive purposes, specific threshold, target and maximum amounts are not shown in the descriptions that follow.

FY15 Strategic
NEOsObjectiveThresholdTargetMaximumPayout
AssignedDescription(50% Payout)(100% Payout)(200% Payout)Attainment%
Messrs. McMullen and DoakCSD - RevenueAchieve 90% ofTarget revenueAchieve 119% ofAchieved
GrowthTarget revenuegrowth % vs.target revenue122% of200%
growth % vs.FY14growth vs. FY14target
FY14
Messrs. McMullen and DoakSSD - Operating-$XM OPAchieve FY15+$XM OPAchieved
Profitdecline vs FallFall Planimprovement vs70% of OP170%
PlanFall Planimprovement
plan
Mr. McMullenOMNISAchieve 87.5%Achieve targetAchieve 125%94% of plan
Shipmentsof target unitsunits placedof target unitsfor units and
placed andand a specifiedplaced andMTBF* target70%
a specifiedMTBF* targeta specifiedachieved
MTBF* targetMTBF* target
Mr. McMullenLSAG Sales –Achieve 104%LSAG/ACGAchieve 96% ofMissed target
Cost Per Orderof LSAG/ACGcost per orderLSAG/ACG costby 1.2% pts85%
Dollar (CPOD)cost per orderdollar Target %per order dollar
dollar target %Target %
Messrs. McMullen andOFS - Gross-0.2 ppts GMAchieve FY15+ 0.25 ppt GMAchieved
Ancher-JensenMargindecline vs FallFall PlanimprovementFY15 Fall100%
PlanPlan
Messrs. McMullen,Dako – FDA**First FDADako DenmarkDako DenmarkWarning
Ancher-Jensenwarning letterdoes notreceivesletter lifted
not lifted butreceive a 2ndconfirmationon April 15,
Dako DenmarkFDA warningfrom the FDA2015200%
can continueletter in FY15of the lifting
to exportand also meetsof the warning
products to theremediationletter by
US in FY15.timeline.10/31/2015
Messrs. McMullen andNMR - Operating-$XMAchieve FY15+$XM OPAchieved
KaltenbachProfitattainment vs.Fall Planimprovement vs30% of OP130%
Fall PlanFall Planimprovement
plan
Messrs. McMullen andLC/MS - RevenueAchieve 67% ofTarget RevenueAchieve 233% ofAchieved
KaltenbachGrowthtarget revenuegrowth % vstarget revenue70% of target55%
growth vs FY14FY14growth vs FY14revenue
growth
Messrs. McMullen and HirschInfrastructureAchieve 102%Achieve 100%Achieve 95%Exceeded
Expensesadjusted actualactual adjustedactual adjustedtarget by 2%140%
expenses vsexpenses vsexpenses vspts
Fall PlanFall PlanFall Plan

____________________

*

Officer

Assigned

MTBF = mean time before failure

FY17 Key Business Initiative

Description

Threshold

(50%)

Target

(100%)

Maximum

(200%)

Payout

Percentage

**

Mr. Doak

In FY14 Dako received an FDA warning letter citing a number

Enable touchless transactional business revenue growth

67% of deficiencies at the Dako Denmark manufacturing site that required remediation. Failure to address these deficiencies could have prevented Dako Denmark from exporting products to the US. To address the issues raised by the FDA Agilent assembled a dedicated teamplan

Achieve Plan

133% of plan

162%

Mr. Doak

Project Iris revenue growth and created this strategic objective to focus management attention on this critical issue. As a resultprofitability

77% of this team’s efforts the FDA lifted the warning letter in April 2015.plan

Achieve Plan

121% of plan

63%

Messrs. Doak and Kaltenbach

China revenue growth

57% of plan

Achieve Plan

143% of plan

93%

Mr. Kaltenbach

Grow LC/MS revenue and market share

67% of plan

Achieve Plan

133% of plan

85%

Mr. Kaltenbach

Project Secretariat revenue growth

50% of plan

Achieve Plan

150% of plan

64%

Mr. Thaysen

China revenue growth

60% of plan

Achieve Plan

140% of plan

0%

Mr. Thaysen

China product registration

42% of plan

Achieve Plan

142% of plan

50%

Mr. Thaysen

Workflow enablement initiative

33% of plan

Achieve Plan

167% of plan

50%



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Actual payout tables for strategic objectiveskey business initiatives use a straight-line payout slope (and/or key milestones) from threshold to target and from target to maximum. The payout table for the FDA was objective and milestone based as described above. Final payouts for each strategic objectivekey business initiative are recommended by the CEO and approved by the Compensation Committee.

Long-Term Incentives – Stock Options, Performance Stock Units and Performance CashRestricted Stock Units

No Performance Stock Units Earned in Fiscal Year 20152017

The performance stock units granted in fiscal year 20132015 were measured based on relative TSR versus all companies in the S&P 500 Health Care, Industrials and IT SectorsMaterials Indexes for fiscal years 20132015 through 2015.2017. The company did not establish an absolute TSR target as we believe performance is best measured on a relative basis against our selected peer group with the payout percentages as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peer Group TSR

 

Payout Percentage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75th Percentile

 

76.2%

 

200%

 

Median

 

40.1%

 

100%

 

25th Percentile

 

15.8%

 

25%

 

Agilent

 

79.3%

 

200%

As noted inIn November 2017, the Executive Summary,no performance stock units were earned in fiscal year 2015Compensation Committee certified the relative TSR results and approved the payout at 200% for the 2013 to 2015 awards because ourrelative TSR fell belowFY15-FY17 performance period that ended on October 31, 2017 as set forth below.  Our strong stock price performance exceeded the 2575th percentile of the stock price performance of our peer group.group for the Long-Term Performance Program resulting in a 200% payout percentage.

Peer Group TSRPayout %
75thPercentile110.7%200%
Median67.2%100%
25thPercentile41.5%25%
Agilent38.4% / 23rdpercentile0%

 

 

Target

Awards

(Shares)

 

Payout at

200% (Shares)

 

Value

of Payout at

200% ($)

Michael R. McMullen

 

50,801

 

101,602

 

$6,854,071

Didier Hirsch

 

21,337

 

42,674

 

$2,878,788

Mark Doak

 

11,176

 

22,352

 

$1,507,866

Patrick Kaltenbach

 

10,160

 

20,320

 

$1,370,787

Jacob Thaysen

 

5,080

 

10,160

 

$685,394

Agilent’s37


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Our TSR performance relative to peers and the payout percentages for the LTPP for the past 5five performance periods are set forth below:

Relative TSR Performance Stock Units – FY16 to FY18 Performance Period

Fifty percent of the performance stock units granted in fiscal year 2016 for the FY16 to FY18 performance period had financial goals based on relative TSR versus all companies in the S&P 500 Health Care and Materials Indexes for fiscal year 2016 through fiscal year 2018.  Relative TSR performance stock units are completely “at-risk” compensation because our performance must be at or above the 25th percentile in order for the individuals to receive a payout.  The final and only payout will be at the end of fiscal year 2018 based on the relative TSR for the three-year performance period.

Operating Margin Performance Stock Units – FY16 to FY18 Performance Period

Fifty percent of the performance stock units granted in fiscal year 2016 for the FY16 to FY18 performance period had financial goals based on adjusted operating margin.  The number of shares earned under these performance stock units will be determined by calculating the operating margin percentage attained at the end of each of the three fiscal years in the performance period compared to the targets (which were set at the beginning of the three-year performance period). We use non-GAAP operating margin adjusted to exclude material M&A during the performance period, subject to Compensation Committee approval. The final and only payout at the end of fiscal year 2018 will be an average of the payout percentage for each fiscal year. The threshold, target and maximum numbers are set forth in the following table:table below:

Fiscal YearAgilent TSR RelativePayout %
Rank to Peer Group
2013 – 201538.4%0.0%
2012 – 201439.7%  69.0%
2011 – 201345.8%87.0%
2010 – 201246.9%  91.0%
2009 – 201154.9%120.0%

Long-Term Performance Shares Operating Margin Percentage

Fiscal Year

 

Threshold
(25%)

 

Target
(100%)

 

Maximum
(200%)

 

Actual

OM%

 

Attainment Percentage

FY16

 

19.50%

 

20.50%

 

21.50%

 

20.9%

 

140%

FY17

 

20.50%

 

21.50%

 

22.50%

 

22.6%

 

200%

FY18

 

21.00%

 

22.00%

 

23.00%

 

TBD

 

TBD

Payout

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TBD

38


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Long-Term Incentives Granted in Fiscal Year 20152017

When determining individual LTI award values, we target ourThe Compensation Committee places emphasis on performance as 60% of the annual NEO grants to be atconsist of performance awards. Restricted stock units make up the 50th percentileother 40% of the peer group, in aggregate. For fiscal year 2015,target LTI value. The target value of the Compensation Committee granted long-term incentives withtarget values for each NEO that were on averageranged between the 25th and 3575th percentile of our compensation peer group. Stock grant values were delivered as follows:

Equity Vehicle

Approximately half the value was in the form of stock options that vest 25% each Weighting

Metric

Vesting

Holding Period

Methodology for Determining

Target Award

Payout Range

Performance

Stock Units

30%

Relative Total

Shareholder

Return

100% after 3rd

year over four years. The exercise price of the option was the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. To determine the number of stock options granted, we divided

Performance

Stock Units

30%

Earnings Per Share

100% after 3rd

year

One-year post-vest

holding period

Divide the target award amount

by the product of the 8-day 20-day

average closingstock price, of Agilent stockpreceding

the grant date, multiplied by the Black-Scholes

applicable accounting valuation.
valuation

Lesser of 2X share target or 3X dollar target value

 

The remaining value of the long-term award is

Restricted

Stock Units

40%

None

25% each

year over 4

years

n/a performance stock unit award, delivered under the LTPP. These performance stock units vest 100% after the conclusion of the three-year performance period, and the resulting final payout may range from 0 to 200% of the originally awarded stock units. To determine the number of performance stock units, we divided the target award amount by the product of the 8-day average stock price multiplied by a Monte Carlo valuation.



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


We typically use a 20-day average closing price of our common stock to determine the number of options and performance stock units for our awards. However, for fiscal year 2015, we used the 8-day average stock price due to the timing of the Keysight spin-off on November 1, 2014. This approach allowed us to begin our average closing price after our stock began trading without Keysight.

Targeting approximately half of the long-term incentive value in stock options and half of the value in performance stock units keeps focus on improving Agilent’s stock price and Agilent’s stock price performance relative to its peers.For fiscal year 2016 performance stock units will represent 60% of the target LTI value with the other 40% delivered in RSUs rather than stock options. Fiscal year2016 LTPP and RSU awards will include a mandatory one-year post vest holding period.

The target value of the long-term incentive awards is determined at the beginning of the then-current fiscal year for each NEO and is partially derived from the peer group data provided by Frederic W. Cook.NEO. The target value also reflects the Compensation Committee’s judgment on the relative role of each NEO’s position within Agilent,the company, as well as the performance of each NEO.NEO and benchmark data from our compensation peer group.

In November 2014, Mr. McMullen was awarded stock options and long-term performance shares with a target value of $3,600,000. Upon his promotion to CEO, he received additional stock options and long-term performance shares with a target value of $1,400,000. Mr. Sullivan’s long-term incentive equity award was reduced over 51% from fiscal year 2014, commensurate with his new role and was delivered 60% in performance stock units and 40% in stock options. Mr. Sullivan’s awards will continue to vest following his retirement,but will only have value if Agilent performs. As the fiscal year 2013-2015 LTPP program illustrates, there is no guaranteed value.

     Number & Type of Award     Total Target Value
Stock Options     Performance     Restrictedof Long Term-
Name(#)1Stock Units (#)(1)Stock Units (#)Incentive Awards ($)
Michael R. McMullen(2)228,76350,801$5,000,000
Didier Hirsch94,85021,337$2,100,000
Mark Doak49,68311,176$1,100,000
Henrik Ancher-Jensen24,8415,588$550,000
Patrick Kaltenbach45,16710,160$1,000,000
William P. Sullivan184,28162,182$5,100,000
____________________

 

 

Type of Award / Value / # of Shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performance Stock Units - TSR

 

Performance Stock Units - EPS

Restricted Stock Units

 

Total Target Value of Long

Term-Incentive Awards

Name

 

($)

 

(#)

 

($)

 

(#)

($)

 

(#)

 

($)

Michael R. McMullen

 

2,100,000

 

40,299

 

2,100,000

 

52,199

2,800,000

 

69,599

 

7,000,000

Didier Hirsch

 

780,000

 

14,968

 

780,000

 

19,388

1,040,000

 

25,851

 

2,600,000

Mark Doak

 

553,500

 

10,621

 

553,500

 

13,758

738,000

 

18,344

 

1,845,000

Patrick Kaltenbach

 

521,100

 

10,000

 

521,100

 

12,953

694,800

 

17,270

 

1,737,000

Jacob Thaysen

 

390,000

 

7,484

 

390,000

 

9,694

520,000

 

12,925

 

1,300,000


(1)Regular stock options and performance stock units were granted on November 19, 2014 to Messrs. McMullen, Hirsch, Doak, Ancher-Jensen and Sullivan and on November 20, 2014 for Mr. Kaltenbach. Mr. McMullen received 162,601 stock options and 36,577 performance stock units.
(2)Mr. McMullen received an additional 66,162 stock options and 14,224 performance stock units upon his promotion to CEO on March 18, 2015.

Performance ConditionConditions for Performance Stock Units Granted in Fiscal Year 20152017

The Compensation Committee has established rolling three-year performance periods for determining earned performance stock awards. The financial goals for the performance stock units for fiscal year 2017 are based on relative TSR and earnings per share. Relative TSR aligns with stockholder interests as higher TSR results in higher potential returns for stockholders as well as ensuring a correlation between performance and payouts. Earnings per share ensures our executives are focused on long-term superior earnings growth. As noted above, our fiscal year 2017 short-term incentive program focuses on adjusted operating margin and revenue, which drive internal business strategies that in turn impact our TSR.  

39


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Relative TSR Performance Stock Units

The performance stock units granted in fiscal year 20152017 with relative TSR as a metric will be measured and paid out based on relative TSR versus all companies in our newLTPP peer group, the Health Care and Materials Indexes of the S&P 500 Health Care, Industrials and Materials Sectors Indexes for fiscal year 20152017 through fiscal year 2017.2019. The LTPP peer group companies are established at the beginning of the performance period and need to have three full years of stock



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

price data to be used in the final relative TSR calculation. The company does not establish an absolute TSR target as we believe performance is best measured on a relative basis against our selected LTPP peer group. The performancepayout schedule determined by the Compensation Committee in fiscal year 20152017 was as follows:

Payout as a

%

Percentage of

Relative TSR Performance

Target

Below 25thPercentile Rank (threshold)

0%

25thPercentile Rank

25%

50thPercentile Rank (target)

100%

75thPercentile Rank and Above

200%

Performance

Relative TSR performance stock units are completely “at-risk” compensation because Agilent’sour performance must be at or above the 25th25th percentile in order for the individuals to receive a payout. As noted, no shares were earned for the fiscal 2013-2015 performance period.

The Compensation Committee has established rolling three-year performance periods for determining earned awards under our LTPP and currently uses relative TSR as a single metric. This metric aligns with shareholder interests as higher TSR results in higher potential returns for shareholders as well as ensuring a correlation between performance and payouts. As noted above, our short-term incentive program focuses on Operating Profit Percent and Revenue, which drive internal business strategies that in turn impact our TSR.In fiscal year 2016, we added operating margin as a financial metric for 50% of the long-term performance shares, which provides a direct line of sight for our executives between the company’s financial performance and their long-term incentive rewards.

For purposes of determining the relative TSR awards, relative TSR reflects (i) the aggregate change in the 20-day average closing price of Agilent’sour stock versus each of the companies in Agilent’sour LTPP peer group, each as measured at the beginning and end of the three-year performance period plus (ii) the value (if any) returned to shareholdersstockholders in the form of dividends or similar distributions, assumed to be reinvested on distribution date on a pre-tax basis.

Earnings Per Share Performance Cash Awards EarnedStock Units – FY17 to FY19 Performance Period

The earnings per share performance awards will be determined by calculating the earnings per share attained at the end of each of the three fiscal years in Fiscal Year 2015

Mr. Ancher-Jensen did not receive a grant or a payout for the LTPP’s fiscal year 2013 through fiscal year 2015 performance period. Instead,period compared to the targets (which are set at the beginning of each fiscal year 2013, he received a long-term cash incentive award for fiscal years 2013 through 2015 as partduring the three-year performance period). The FY17 EPS target was set at the mid-point of external guidance issued at the beginning of the Dako acquisition agreement.fiscal year.  We use non-GAAP adjusted diluted earnings per share and all targets are subject to Compensation Committee approval. The metrics for this three-year performance period were (1) Dako Revenuefinal and Operating Profit from distributiononly payout will be at the end of Dako products in Asia and (2) Agilent Genomics Solutions Division sales through Dako channels (“GSD Sales”).

Onefiscal year 2019 based on an average of the sources of value behind the Dako acquisition was to leverage Agilent’s footprintpayout percentage for each fiscal year. The threshold, target and presence in Asia to grow the Dako business in that region, as it was deemed to be underrepresented versus Europe and the Americas. In order to tie those sources of value with the three-year incentive plan for Dako executives, 80% of the incentive pay was tied to achieving the combination of the standalone Dako revenue and operating profit goals as well as the incremental revenues and related profit from accelerating the growth in Asia.



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

To determine the earned award for Mr. Ancher-Jensen, we used a payout matrix that links the metrics and reflects threshold-to-maximum opportunities based on various achievementmaximum levels of the metrics. No award was paid unless the Revenue and Operating Profit thresholds were achieved. The maximum award was capped at 200% of the target award. The target metrics and results for these awards are set forth in the table below:

FY13-FY15 Dako Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan(1)
Revenue
($ Mil)
Operating Profit
($ Mil)
NameComponent% of Long-term
bonus
ThresholdTargetMaxResultsThresholdTargetMaxResults
Mr. Ancher-JensenDako & Agilent
Asia Synergy
80%80%
of Target
$X120%
of Target
89% of
Target
21% of
Target
$X179% of
Target
55% of
Target
Agilent
Genomics
20%80%
of Target
$X120%
of Target
2% of
Target

____________________

 

Long-Term Performance Shares Earnings Per Share

 

Fiscal Year

 

Threshold

(25%)

 

Target

(100%)

 

Maximum

(200%)

 

Actual

EPS (non-GAAP)

 

Attainment Percentage

 

FY17

 

$1.98

 

$2.13

 

$2.28

 

$2.36

 

200%

 

FY18

 

TBA

 

TBA

 

TBA

 

TBA

 

TBA

 

FY19

 

TBA

 

TBA

 

TBA

 

TBA

 

TBA

 

Payout

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TBA


(1)     For competitive purposes, specific threshold, target and maximum amounts are not shown.

Based on actual results over the performance period, the Dako incentive plan paid out at 40% of target, which resulted in a payment of $815,844 to Mr. Ancher-Jensen.Additional Information

Equity Grant Practices

The Compensation Committee generally makes grants of stock awards to our NEOs at the first Compensation Committee meeting of our fiscal year. Awards are neither timed to relate to the price of Agilent’sour stock nor to correspond with the release of material non-public information, although grants are generally made when Agilent’sour trading window is open. Grants to current employees are generally effective on the date of the Compensation Committee meeting approving such grants. Grants to new employees, including potential NEOs, are typically made at the next regularly scheduled Compensation Committee meeting following the employee’s start date. The standard vesting schedule for our equity grants is shown100% after the third year for performance stock units and 25% per year over four years for restricted stock units. Starting in the table below.In fiscal year 2016, we addedawards granted to executive level employees and above are also subject to a one-year post vestpost-vest holding period to eachperiod.

40


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

When an employee retires after age 55 with 15 years of the LTI grants.

Equity VehicleFY15 DesignFY16 DesignStandard Vesting Schedule
Stock Options50%0%25% each year over four years
Performance Stock Units50%60%100% after the third year
Restricted Stock Units0%40%25% each year over four years

If an NEO dies or is fully disabled, his or her unvested stock options or stock awards fully vest. In addition, when an NEO retires from Agilent,service, his or her stock options and stock awards continue to vest per their original vesting schedule rather than accelerate at termination.termination and such employee is eligible to receive the full amount paid out under his or her performance stock units at the end of the applicable performance period, assuming such retirement occurs after the 12-month anniversary of the date of grant of the performance stock units.    If such retirement occurs during the first 12 months of the date of grant of the performance stock units, the employee would be eligible to receive a pro rata portion of the amount paid out under his or her performance stock units at the end of the applicable performance period.  We believe continued vesting into retirement better aligns NEO interests with shareholdersstockholders beyond the date they retire from the company. Meanwhile, performance stock units are earned based on the satisfaction of the performance metrics. In addition, within the first 12 months of a performance period, the entire performance stock unit award is pro-rated based upon completion of the first 12 months of the performance period.  As of October 31, 2015, Mr. Sullivan, Mr.2017, Messrs. McMullen, Hirsch and Mr. Doak were entitled to retirement vesting. Mr. McMullen will become retiree eligible in February 2016. Finally, stockmet the eligibility requirements for continued vesting upon retirement.  Stock options and stock awards vest on a double-trigger“double-trigger” basis in connection with a change in control as described below.  Finally, if an employee dies or becomes fully disabled, his or her unvested stock options or stock awards fully vest.  



TableCompensation Risk Controls

Semler Brossy, our independent compensation consultant, collaborates with management to conduct an annual review of Contentsour compensation-related risks. The risk assessment conducted during fiscal year 2017 did not identify any significant compensation-related risks and concluded that our compensation program is well designed to encourage behaviors aligned with the long-term interests of stockholders. Semler Brossy also found an appropriate balance in fixed versus variable pay, cash and equity, corporate, business unit, and individual goals, financial and non-financial performance measures, and formulas and discretion. Finally, it was determined that there are appropriate policies and controls in place to mitigate compensation-related risk, including the following:

Recoupment Policy

We maintain an Executive Compensation Recoupment Policy that applies to all our executive officers covered by Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act. Under this Policy, in the event of (1) a material restatement of financial results (wherein results were incorrect at the time published due to mistake, fraud or other misconduct) or (2) fraud or misconduct by an executive officer, the Compensation Committee will, in the case of a restatement, review all short and long-term incentive compensation awards that were paid or awarded to executive officers for performance periods beginning after July 14, 2009 that occurred, in whole or in part, during the restatement period. In the case of fraud or misconduct, the Compensation Committee will consider actions to remedy the misconduct, prevent its recurrence, and impose discipline on the wrongdoers, in each case, as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate.

These actions may include, without limitation:

    requiring reimbursement of compensation;

    the cancellation of outstanding restricted stock or deferred stock awards, stock options, and other equity incentive awards;

    limiting future awards or compensation; and

    requiring the disgorgement of profits realized from the sale of our stock to the extent such profit resulted from fraud or misconduct.

Insider Trading Policy

Our insider trading policy expressly prohibits:

    ownership of financial instruments or participation in investment strategies that hedge the economic risk of owning our stock;

    officers and directors from pledging our securities as collateral for loans; and

    officers, directors and employees from purchasing or selling our securities while in possession of material, non-public information, or otherwise using such information for their personal benefit.

Our executives and directors are permitted to enter into trading plans that are intended to comply with the requirements of Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act so that they can prudently diversify their asset portfolios and exercise their stock options before expiration.

41


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Additional InformationStock Ownership Guidelines

BenefitsOur stock ownership guidelines are designed to encourage our NEOs and other executive officers to achieve and maintain a significant equity stake in our company and more closely align their interests with those of our stockholders. The guidelines provide that the CEO and CFO and other executive officers should accumulate and hold, within five years from election to his or her position, an investment level in our stock equal to the lesser of a multiple of his or her annual base salary or accumulate a direct ownership of our stock as set forth below:

Agilent’s

Investment Level =

Direct Ownership of

Multiple of Annual

Agilent Stock

Executive

Base Salary

(# of Shares)

CEO

6X

N/A

CFO

3X

80,000

All other executive officers

3X

40,000

Shares directly owned by the executive officer and their household family members, deferred shares and vested restricted stock units are considered in complying with these guidelines.  An annual review is conducted to assess compliance with the guidelines and at the end of fiscal year 2017, all of our NEOs had either met or were on track to reach their stock ownership guideline requirements within the applicable timeframe.

Benefits

Our global benefits philosophy is to provide NEOs with protection and security through health and welfare, retirement, disability insurance and life insurance programs. During fiscal year 2015,2017, the CEO and other NEOs were eligible to receive the same benefits that are generally available to our other Agilent employees.  Generally, it is our Compensation Committee’s philosophy to not provide perquisites to our NEOs except in limited circumstances.

In addition to the company-wide benefits, Agilent’sour NEOs have company-paid financial counseling through a third party service to assist with their personal finances. We believe that providing this service gives our NEOs a better understanding of their pay and benefits, allowing them to concentrate on Agilent’s future success.our business objectives. Financial counseling is a benefit generally provided by our peer companies and is available at a reasonable group cost to Agilent.us.

Generally, it isIn addition, our Compensation Committee’s philosophy to not provide perquisites to our NEOs except in limited circumstances. For example, in fiscal year 2015, there were no special perquisites for our NEOs except for financial counseling and the occasional use by executive officers ofcan use company drivers to transport themthemselves and their family members to the airport for personal travel.  In addition, the companyLastly, we provided some relocation expenses for Mr.Messrs. McMullen, Kaltenbach and some expenses relatedThaysen to facilitate their relocations to the temporary relocation assignment for Mr. Kaltenbach pursuant to our standard relocation policy applicable to all employees. The company previously provided an Executive Physical benefit to Officers, which we discontinued in fiscal year 2015.San Francisco Bay Area from New Jersey, Germany and Denmark, respectively. These perquisites are included and footnoted in the “All other Compensation” column in the “Summary Compensation Table.”

Deferred Compensation

NEOs on the U.S. payroll are eligible to voluntarily defer base salary, short-term incentives in the form of awards under the Performance-Based Compensation Plan and long-term incentives in the form of stock awards under the LTPP. The deferrals are made through our 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan, which is available to all active employees on the US payroll withwhose total target cash salary, including the short-term Performance Based Compensation Plan,compensation is greater than or equal to $265,000.$270,000. This is a common benefit arrangement offered by our peer companies, and our plan does not guarantee above market or a specific rate of return on deferrals.

These benefits and an additional description of plan features are set forth in the section entitled “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation in Last Fiscal Year” below and the narrative descriptions accompanying this section.

Retirement and Pension PlansBenefits

We provide a pension plan, the Agilent Technologies, Inc. Retirement Plan (“Retirement Plan”),Our executive officers are entitled to our current NEOs on U.S. payroll, as well as other eligible Agilent employees, who were hired before November 1, 2014, for long-term employment retention and to support our career-employment strategy, as well as to provide employee retirement savings. In addition, we provide the Agilent Technologies, Inc. Supplemental Benefit Retirement Plan (the “Supplemental Benefit Retirement Plan”) to our NEOsparticipate in the U.S. and othersame defined contribution retirement plan that is generally available to all of our eligible Agilent employees who were hired before November 1, 2014. The Supplemental Benefit Retirement Plan is an unfunded, non-qualified pensionemployees.  We make matching contributions to eligible participants’ retirement plan which pays amounts uponaccounts based on a percentage of their eligible compensation under applicable rules.  We believe that this retirement that would be due under the regular Retirement Plan benefit formula, but are limited under the tax-qualified Retirement Plan by the Internal Revenue Code. Both the Retirement Plan and the Supplemental Benefit Retirement Plan were closedprogram permits our executives to new entrants effective November 1, 2014. We also providesave for their retirement in a pension plan to a current NEO and other eligible employees in Germany. The German Pension plan is described in further detail on page 60.tax-effective manner.  

42




Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Additionally, we provide the Agilent Technologies, Inc. Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan (the “Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan”) that provides certain amounts to our NEOs and other Agilent employees who provided services to our predecessor company, Hewlett-Packard Company (“Hewlett-Packard”), prior to November 1, 1993. None of these plans provide any credit of benefits prior to the date of hire or where there is a break in service.

Retirement benefits are set forth in the table entitled “Pension Benefits” on page 56 and the narrative descriptions accompanying this table.

Policy Regarding Compensation in Excess of $1 Million aper Year

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallows a tax deduction for compensation in excess of $1 million paid to our “covered employees,” which currently include our CEO CFO and the three other most highly compensated NEOs employed at the end of the year.year (other than our CFO). Certain compensation is specifically exempt from the deduction limit to the extent that it is “performance based”“performance-based” as defined in Section 162(m) of the Code..

Our Compensation Committee considers the impact of Section 162(m) in setting and determining executive compensation because it is concerned with the net cost of executive compensation to Agilentthe company (i.e., taking into account the tax treatment of the compensation), and its ability to effectively administer executive compensation in the long-term interests of stockholders.

For fiscal year 2015, stock options,2017, short-term cash incentives, restricted stock units and long-term performance stock units are intended to comply with the exception for performance-based compensation under Section 162(m). Of course,However, in order to maintain flexibility in rewarding individual performance and contributions, the Compensation Committee will not limit all the amounts paid under all of Agilent’sour compensation programs to just those that qualify for tax deductibility. AgilentFurther, we cannot guarantee that compensation that is intended to comply with the performance-based compensation exception under Section 162(m) of the Code will in fact so qualify.

Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCIA), effective for our taxable year beginning November 1, 2018, the exception under Section 162(m) for performance-based compensation will no longer be available, subject to transition relief for certain grandfathered arrangements in effect as of November 2, 2017.  In addition, the covered employees will be expanded to include our CFO, and once one of our NEOs is considered a covered employee, the NEO will remain a covered employee so long as he or she receives compensation from us.  Given the lack of regulatory guidance to date, the Compensation Committee is not yet able to determine the full impact of the TCIA’s changes to Section 162(m) on the Company and our compensation programs.

Termination and Change of Control

Consistent with the practice of many of our peers, the Compensation Committee adopted change-of-control agreements designed to provide protection to the NEOs so they are not distracted by their personal, professional and financial situations at a time when Agilent needswe need them to remain focused on their responsibilities, Agilent’sour best interests and those of all itsour stockholders. These agreements provide for a double-trigger“double-trigger” payout only in the event of a change inof control and the executive officer is either terminated from his-or-her position or moved into a position that represents a substantial change in responsibilities within a limited period of time after the transaction (these agreements do not become operative unless both events occur).

We haveeliminated excise tax gross-ups for our CEO, Mr. McMullen, and all officers entering into newly executed change-of-control agreements after July 14, 2009, including our CEO, Mr. McMullen.2009. Only one officer that had such protection under an ongoing agreement executed prior to July 14, 2009 will continue to have this benefit as long as the existing agreement remains in effect without material amendment. Potential payments to our NEOs in the event of a change of control under our existing agreements are reported in the “Termination and Change of Control Table.”

In addition, we have a Workforce Management Program in place that is applicable to all Agilent employees, including NEOs. Employment security is tied to competitive realities as well as individual results and performance, but from time to time, business circumstances could dictate the need for Agilentus to reduce itsour workforce. The Workforce Management Program is intended to assist employees affected by restructuring by providing transition income in the form of severance benefits.


43




Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material,” to be “filed” with the SEC, or to be subject to Regulation 14A or Regulation 14C (other than as provided in Item 407 of Regulation S-K) or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in future filings with the SEC except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The company’s executive compensation program is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”). The Compensation Committee, which is composed entirely of independent, non-employee directors, is responsible for approving and reporting to the Board on all elements of compensation for the executive officers. In this regard, the Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement with management. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into the company’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Submitted by:

Compensation Committee

Tadataka Yamada, M.D., Chairperson

Hans E. Bishop

James G. Cullen

Heidi Kunz

George A. Scangos, PhD

44


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

Agilent’s

The following table sets forth information regarding compensation earned by our NEOs for fiscal 2015 include Agilent’s (i) Presidentyear 2017 and, Chief Executive Officer,(ii) Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, (iii) Agilent’s Former Presidentif applicable, during fiscal year 2016 and Chief Executive Officer and (iv) the other three most highly compensated executive officers who2015.  All compensation is disclosed, whether or not such amounts were serving as executive officers at the end of fiscal 2015.paid in such year:

Summary Compensation Table
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Non-EquityDeferred
StockOptionIncentive PlanCompensationAll other
Name andSalaryBonusAwardsAwardsCompensationEarningsCompensation
Principal PositionYear($)($)(1)($)(2)(3)($)(2)(3)($)(4)($)(5)($)(6)Total ($)
Michael R. McMullen2015$845,833$0$2,520,205$2,434,524$1,110,963$70,994$225,333$7,207,852
President2014$606,250$0$2,332,309$994,432$467,177$91,716$39,056$4,530,940
Chief Executive Officer2013$575,000$0$802,571$876,960$465,704$106,498$30,108$2,856,840
 
Didier Hirsch2015$600,000$0$1,049,012$1,001,660$516,408$111,075$18,643$3,296,798
Senior Vice President,2014$600,000$0$1,044,826$1,048,187$633,396$111,158$16,275$3,453,842
Chief Financial Officer2013$597,917$0$869,456$950,040$382,152$110,862$21,701$2,932,127
 
Mark Doak(7)2015$422,917$0$549,457$524,676$421,697$29,986$16,354$1,965,087
Senior Vice President,
President Cross-Labs
Group
 
Henrik Ancher-Jensen(7)2015$398,867$0$274,728$262,333$1,174,362$124,798$28,227$2,263,315
Senior Vice President,
President Order
Fulfillment and Supply
Chain
 
Patrick Kaltenbach(7)(8)2015$407,262$0$505,138$481,253$311,732$792,590$153,102$2,651,077
Senior Vice President,
President Life Sciences
and Applied Markets
Group
 
William P. Sullivan(9)2015$630,000$0$3,057,116$1,946,094$894,285($88,146)$28,498$6,467,847
Former President and2014$1,050,000$0$6,632,830$4,569,033$1,631,089$0$31,781$13,914,733
Chief Executive Officer2013$1,045,000$0$3,789,936$4,141,200$1,228,875$0$30,661$10,235,672

____________________

 

Name and

 

 

 

Salary

 

Stock

Awards (2)(3)

 

Option

Awards (2)(3)

 

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation (4)

 

Change in

Pension Value

and Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings (5)

 

All other

Compensation (6)

 

Total

 

Principal Position

 

Year (1)

 

($)

 

($)

 

($)

 

($)

 

($)

 

($)

 

($)

 

Michael R. McMullen

 

2017

 

1,095,833

 

7,205,347

 

-

 

1,580,150

 

-

 

209,331

 

10,090,661

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

2016

 

1,041,667

 

6,341,255

 

-

 

1,338,183

 

48,144

 

145,166

 

8,914,415

 

 

 

2015

 

845,833

 

2,520,205

 

2,434,524

 

1,110,963

 

70,994

 

225,333

 

7,207,852

 

Didier Hirsch

 

2017

 

627,500

 

2,676,250

 

-

 

556,920

 

-

 

79,927

 

3,940,597

 

Senior Vice President,

 

2016

 

600,000

 

2,747,816

 

-

 

494,112

 

49,401

 

41,066

 

3,932,395

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

2015

 

600,000

 

1,049,012

 

1,001,660

 

516,408

 

111,075

 

18,643

 

3,296,798

 

Mark Doak

 

2017

 

520,833

 

1,899,068

 

-

 

453,787

 

-

 

51,822

 

2,925,510

 

Senior Vice President,

 

2016

 

470,833

 

1,638,114

 

-

 

476,867

 

17,786

 

36,608

 

2,640,208

 

President Cross-Lab Group

 

2015

 

422,917

 

549,457

 

524,676

 

421,697

 

29,986

 

16,354

 

1,965,087

 

Patrick Kaltenbach

 

2017

 

532,083

 

1,787,948

 

-

 

456,220

 

207,839

 

562,761

 

3,546,852

 

Senior Vice President,

 

2016

 

487,976

 

1,479,571

 

-

 

418,085

 

488,406

 

1,520,233

 

4,394,271

 

President Life Sciences and

 

2015

 

407,262

 

505,138

 

481,253

 

311,732

 

792,590

 

153,102

 

2,651,077

 

Applied Markets Group

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jacob Thaysen

 

2017

 

495,000

 

1,338,104

 

-

 

356,583

 

-

 

211,242

 

2,400,930

 

Senior Vice President,

 

2016

 

436,667

 

845,472

 

-

 

510,753

 

-

 

1,020,749

 

2,813,641

 

President Diagnostics and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Genomics Group

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


(1)

None of the executive officers received any service awards or cash bonuses

Compensation is provided only for fiscal years 2015, 2014 or 2013, other than provided in the Non-Equity Incentive Compensation Plan.for which each individual qualified as an NEO.    

(2)

(2)

Reflects the aggregate grant date fair values, computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board, Accounting Standards Codification, Topic 718, Stock Compensation (“FASB ASC Topic 718”).  TheFor more information regarding our application of FASB ASC Topic 718, including the assumptions used in calculating the expense are providedcalculations of these amounts, please refer to Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in additional detail inour Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the tables below.SEC on December 21, 2017.

(3)

The expenses listed in these columns include expenses for stock awards and options awarded in accordance with the LTP ProgramLTPP and 2009 Stock Plan, as shownPlan.  For performance-based restricted stock unit awards, the grant date fair value of such awards at the time of grant was based upon the probable outcome at the time of grant. The value of the performance-based restricted stock unit awards at the grant date assuming that the highest level of performance conditions was achieved was $8,656,248, $3,215,140, $2,281,454, $2,148,012 and $1,607,568 for Messrs. McMullen, Hirsch, Doak, Kaltenbach and Thaysen, respectively. The amounts reflected in this column do not represent the table below. The threshold and maximumactual amounts paid to or realized by the named executive officer for performance shares granted under the LTP program can be found in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2015 below.these awards.

(4)

Amounts consist of incentive awards earned by the NEOs during the fiscal year under the Performance-Based Compensation Plan for Covered Employees. In addition, Mr. Ancher-Jensen received a payout from a long-term cash incentive bonus that was originally granted in November 2012. This bonus is described above in the Performance Cash Awards Earned in fiscal year 2015 section.



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


(5)

Amounts represent the net change in pension value for the following Agilentcompany sponsored pension plans: Agilent Technologies, Inc. Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan,Plan; Agilent Technologies, Inc. Retirement Plan,Plan; Agilent Technologies, Inc. Supplemental Benefit Retirement PlanPlan; and the Agilent Technologies, Inc. German Pension Plan.

(6)Amounts reflect (i) employer contributions of $10,600 to Messrs. McMullen, Hirsch and Ancher-Jensen, $10,500 to Mr. Sullivan and $6,296 to Mr. Doak for the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 401(k) Plan in fiscal year 2015, and , (ii) $19,968 for Mr. McMullen, $17,944 to Mr. Sullivan, $8,168 for Mr. Doak and $16,582 for Mr. Ancher-Jensen for services incurred from The Ayco Company, LP, the provider designated by Agilent to provide financial counseling services to our NEOs, and $11,745 for Mr. McMullen and $7,045 for Mr. Hirsch for services incurred by KPMG, LLC, a tax provider designated by Agilent to provide tax preparation services for certain NEOs, (iii) travel expenses of $1,981 for Mr. McMullen, $290 for Mr. Hirsch, $580 for Mr. Doak, $145 for Mr. Ancher-Jensen and $531 for Mr. Kaltenbach for use of Agilent drivers and vehicles for personal travel, (iv) $1,300 for Mr. McMullen, $708 for Mr. Hirsch, $1,310 for Mr. Doak, $900 for Mr. Ancher-Jensen and $54 for Mr. Sullivan, for employer contribution to a health savings account, (v) $179,739 for Mr. McMullen’s relocation expenses, and vi) $152,571 for expenses related to Mr. Kaltenbach’s temporary work assignment in the U.S.
(7)Messrs. Doak, Ancher-Jensen and Kaltenbach were not named executive officers in the Company’s 2014 and 2015 Proxy Statements. Therefore, this table does not provide fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2014 compensation data for them.
(8)Amounts included for Mr. Kaltenbach with the exception of stock awards and option awards, are shown in U.S. Dollars but were paid to himhis change in Euro. To convertpension value for the amounts paidGerman Pension Plan are calculated in Euros and then converted to U.S. Dollars we usedusing the prevailing exchange rate as of the last business day of the applicable fiscal year (for FY15 amounts, an exchange rate of 1.10060927 U.S. Dollars per Euro).
(9)year. The cumulative year-over-year change for Mr. SullivanHirsch resulted in a net loss but is includedshown in the table as he served as CEO through March 17, 2015.zero.  

The following table itemizes the full grant date fair value of equity grants made during the 2013, 2014 and 2015 fiscal years in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns of the “Summary Compensation” table.

Long-term Incentive Awards
 Long-Term Performance Program
Total FY15 ExpenseTotal FY14 ExpenseTotal FY13 Expense
  Restricted   Restricted   Restricted
StockStockStock
StockOptionUnitStockOptionUnitStockOptionUnit
AwardsAwardsAwardsAwardsAwardsAwardsAwardsAwardsAwards
Mr. McMullen$2,520,205$2,434,524$2,332,309$994,432$802,571$876,960
Mr. Hirsch$1,049,012$1,001,660$1,044,826$1,048,187$869,456$950,040
Mr. Doak$549,457$524,676
Mr. Ancher-Jensen$274,728$262,333
Mr. Kaltenbach$505,138$481,253
Mr. Sullivan$3,057,116$1,946,094$4,554,407$4,569,033$2,078,423$3,789,936$4,141,200

FASB ASC Topic 718 Assumptions

The following table sets forth the weighted average FASB ASC Topic 718 assumptions used in 2012 to 2015 in the calculation of the stock awards and option awards presented in our “Summary Compensation Table”. For all periods presented, the fair value of share-based awards for employee stock options awards was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, while shares granted under the LTP Program were valued using a Monte Carlo simulation. The estimated fair value of restricted stock unit awards was determined based on the market price of Agilent’s common stock on the date of grant, adjusted for expected dividend yield. On January 17, 2012, the company’s Board of Directors approved the initiation of quarterly cash dividends to the company’s shareholders. The fair value of all the awards granted prior to the declaration of quarterly cash dividends was measured based on an expected dividend yield of 1%.



Table of Contents

(6)

NEO

401(k) Employer Contribution (a)

Deferred Compensation Employer Contributions (b)

Financial Counseling (c)

Travel Expenses (d)

Relocation(e)

Total

Mr. McMullen

$15,798

$40,950

$33,200

$10,015

$109,368

$209,331

Mr. Hirsch

$29,450

$35,231

$5,707

$9,539

$0

$79,927

Mr. Doak

$16,200

$10,763

$16,695

$8,165

$0

$51,822

Mr. Kaltenbach

$16,531

$14,424

$16,695

$8,517

$506,594

$562,761

Mr. Thaysen

$15,708

$0

$30,046

$9,801

$155,687

$211,242

45


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


  Years Ended October 31, 2015
2015  2014  2013  2012
Stock Option Plans:
       Weighted average risk-free interest rate1.75%1.69%0.86%0.88%
       Dividend yield1%1%1%0%
       Weighted average volatility28%39%39%38%
       Expected life5.5 yrs5.8 yrs5.8 yrs5.8 yrs
 
LTPP:
       Volatility of Agilent shares25%36%37%41%
       Volatility of selected peer-company shares12%-57%13%-57%6%-64%17%-75%
       Price-wise correlation with selected peers37%47%49%62%

a) Amounts reflect company contributions to the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 401(k) Plan in fiscal year 2017. In addition to the company match, Mr. Hirsch also received a transitional company contribution which was provided to all eligible employees as a result of the freeze of our pension plan.    

b) Amounts reflect company contributions to the Agilent Technologies Deferred Compensation Plan in fiscal year 2017. Amounts include matching contributions on deferred base salary and /or transitional company contributions, both of which were provided to all eligible employees as a result of the freeze of our pension plan.  

c) Amounts reflect the cost to the company of financial counseling and tax preparation services.

d) Amounts reflect imputed income expenses for the use of our drivers and vehicles for personal travel, including spouses and family; and expenses related to spousal travel to our annual President’s Club meeting to recognize the highest performing sales people in the company. The amounts include tax gross-ups on the expenses related to spousal travel to our President’s Club of $3,954 for Mr. McMullen, $4,059 for Mr. Hirsch, $3,443 for Mr. Doak, $3,538 for Mr. Kaltenbach and $4,158 for Mr. Thaysen. Gross-ups on spousal travel to our President’s Club is provided for all attendees, not just the named executive officers.  

e) Our relocation program is available to all employees including officers, and is designed to facilitate employee relocations that support our business priorities. Our relocation program does not provide any payments for loss on the sale of a home or special tax gross ups. When Mr. McMullen was named CEO, and once his management team had been identified, it was decided that it would be in the best interest of the company and its stockholders for Messrs.’ McMullen, Kaltenbach and Thaysen to relocate to the Bay Area and work at our corporate headquarters located in Santa Clara, one of the costliest housing areas in the U.S. For Messrs. Kaltenbach and Thaysen, this entailed permanent relocation from their home countries of Germany and Denmark, respectively.  To facilitate these moves, each of these NEOs participated in our relocation program. For fiscal year 2017, relocation costs for Mr. McMullen were $109,368 in total for his expenses related to his relocation from New Jersey to the San Francisco Bay Area. This amount covered expense related to the purchase of a home. The total relocation costs for Mr. Kaltenbach’s relocation from Germany for 2017 was $506,594. This included his second of two installments of $447,500, payable under our Global Relocation Supplement Program that is available to all international transferees (see below); $32,320 for tax preparation / consultation and host authority tax payment; $10,421 for miscellaneous allowances; and $16,353 for expenses related to the sale and purchase of a home. The total relocation costs for 2017 for Mr. Thaysen were $155,687 for his relocation from Denmark. These expenses included $83,500, payable under our Global Relocation Supplement Program; $4,305 for tax preparation / consultation and host authority tax payment; $57,273 for cost of living adjustments; and $10,609 for expenses related to shipping of household goods.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Last Fiscal Year

The following table sets forth certain information regarding grants of plan-based awards to each of our NEOs during fiscal year 2015.2017. For more information, please refer to the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2015
Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(1)
Estimated Payouts Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards(2)
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
All
Other
Stock
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
GrantThresholdTargetMaximumThresholdTargetMaximumOptionsAwardsAwardsAwards
NameDate($)($)($)($)($)($)(#)(3)(#)($/Sh)($)
Michael R. McMullen11/19/2014$145,714$633,427$1,266,854
5/19/2015$42,750$427,500$855,000
11/19/2014$449,568$1,798,272$3,596,543$1,798,272
11/19/2014162,601$40.80$1,717,143
3/18/2015$180,483721,933$1,443,867721,933
3/18/201566,162$42.12$717,381
Didier Hirsch11/19/2014$78,000$300,000$600,000
5/19/2015$18,000$180,000$360,000
11/19/2014$262,253$1,049,012$2,098,025$1,049,012
11/19/201494,850$40.80$1,001,660
Mark Doak11/19/2014$55,250$212,500$425,000
5/19/2015$12,750$127,500$255,000
11/19/2014$137,364$549,457$1,098,914$549,457
11/19/201449,683$40.80$524,676
Henrik Ancher-Jensen11/19/2014$52,000$200,000$400,000
5/19/2015$12,000$120,000$240,000
11/19/2014$68,682$274,728$549,457$274,728
11/19/201424,841$40.80$262,333
Patrick Kaltenbach11/19/2014$51,760$203,870$407,741
5/19/2015$12,544$125,439$250,877
11/20/2014$126,284$505,138$1,010,276$505,138
11/20/201445,167$41.26$481,253
William P. Sullivan11/19/2014$78,750$787,500$1,575,000
5/19/2015$15,750$157,500$315,000
11/19/2014$764,279$3,057,116$6,114,232$3,057,116
11/19/2014184,281$40.80$1,946,094

____________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grant Date

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated Possible Payouts Under

 

Estimated Payouts Under Equity

 

All Other

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

 

 

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)

 

Incentive Plan Awards (2)

 

Stock

 

of Stock

 

 

 

 

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

 

Awards (3)

 

Awards (4)

 

Name

 

Grant Date

 

($)

 

($)

 

($)

 

($)

 

($)

 

($)

 

($)

 

($)

 

Michael R. McMullen

 

11/16/2016

 

143,000

 

1,430,000

 

2,860,000

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

525,000

 

2,100,000

 

4,200,000

 

-

 

2,181,396

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

525,000

 

2,100,000

 

4,200,000

 

-

 

2,146,728

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

2,877,223

 

2,877,223

 

 

Didier Hirsch

 

11/16/2016

 

50,400

 

504,000

 

1,008,000

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

195,000

 

780,000

 

1,560,000

 

-

 

810,225

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

195,000

 

780,000

 

1,560,000

 

-

 

797,345

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

1,068,680

 

1,068,680

 

 

Mark Doak

 

11/16/2016

 

84,000

 

420,000

 

840,000

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

138,375

 

553,500

 

1,107,000

 

-

 

574,947

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

138,375

 

553,500

 

1,107,000

 

-

 

565,780

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

758,341

 

758,341

 

 

Patrick Kaltenbach

 

11/16/2016

 

85,600

 

428,000

 

856,000

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

130,275

 

521,100

 

1,042,200

 

-

 

541,306

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

130,275

 

521,100

 

1,042,200

 

-

 

532,700

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

713,942

 

713,942

 

 

Jacob Thaysen

 

11/16/2016

 

80,000

 

400,000

 

800,000

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

97,500

 

390,000

 

780,000

 

-

 

405,112

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

97,500

 

390,000

 

780,000

 

-

 

398,672

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

534,320

 

534,320

 


46


(1)     

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

(1)

Reflects the value of the potential payout targets for fiscal year 20152017 pursuant to the annual award program under Agilent’sour Performance-Based Compensation Plan. Actual payout amounts under this plan are disclosed in the “Summary Compensation Table.” Mr. McMullen’s target amounts for November 19, 2014 and May 19, 2015 include his increase in target bonus as a result of his promotion to CEO on March 18, 2015.



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


(2)

Reflects the value of potential payout of the target number of performance shares granted in fiscal year 20152017 for the FY15FY17 through FY17FY19 performance period under Agilent’s LTP Program.our LTPP.  Actual payout of these awards, if any, will be determined by the Compensation Committee after the end of the performance period depending on whether the performance criteria set forth in Agilent’s LTP Programour LTPP were met. Payout, if any, will be in the form of Agilentour common stock. Please see section entitled “Long-Term“Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Long-Term Incentives” for disclosure regarding material terms of the LTP Program. Mr. McMullen’s target award shares under the LTP Program increased as a result of his promotion to CEO on March 18, 2015.LTPP.

(3)

Reflects optionsrestricted stock units granted in fiscal year 20152017 under the 2009 Stock Plan in accordance with Agilent’sour long-term incentive goals as described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Incentives.” Such optionsrestricted stock units vest at 25% per year over four years. Mr. McMullen’syears with a one-year post-vest holding period assigned to each tranche as it vests.

(4)

Amounts represent the grant date fair value determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 based on the target award options increased as a resultlevel of his promotionperformance. Values differ due to CEO on March, 18, 2015.the performance criteria assigned to each award.

47


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Outstanding Equity AwardsAwards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table provides information on the current holdings of options, performance-based stock awards and restricted stock units, by our NEOs as of October 31, 2015.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year 2015 Year End

  

Option Awards(1)

Restricted Stock
Unit Awards

Performance Share
Awards

Grant
Date




Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options (#)
Option
Exercise

Price ($)
Option
Vesting

Date
Option
Expiration

Date
Number
of Shares

or Units
of Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(2)
Market
Value of

Shares
or Units
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
Number of
Unearned

Shares
That Have
Not Vested
(#)(3)
Market
Value of

Shares
That Have
Not Vested
($)

  Name

Exercisable

Unexercisable

  Michael R. McMullen   11/18/2008      26,885           0          $13.89     11/18/2009   11/17/2018                
11/18/2009130,037 0 $21.5311/18/201011/17/2019
11/17/201094,962 0$25.7311/17/201111/16/2020
11/17/201165,55021,853$27.1911/17/201211/16/2021
11/21/201249,27049,273$26.1911/21/201311/20/2022
11/20/201318,17854,538$39.1211/20/201411/19/2023
11/19/20140162,601$40.8011/19/201511/18/2024
 3/18/2015066,162$42.123/18/20163/17/2025
11/21/201225,061$946,321
11/20/201320,210$763,113
9/17/20149,738$367,706
9/17/201414,479$546,727
11/19/201436,577$1,381,148
3/18/201514,224$537,098
  Total384,882354,427  0$0120,289$4,542,113
 
  Didier Hirsch11/17/201089,0260$25.7311/17/201111/16/2020
11/17/201169,40723,138$27.1911/17/201211/16/2021
11/21/201253,37653,379$26.1911/21/201311/20/2022
11/20/201319,16157,486$39.1211/20/201411/19/2023
11/19/2014094,850$40.8011/19/201511/18/2024
11/21/201227,150$1,025,185
11/20/201321,303$804,406
11/19/201421,337$805,685
  Total230,970228,853  0$069,790$2,635,276



Table2017. In November 2014, all outstanding shares and exercise prices from grants made prior to November 1, 2014 were adjusted due to the spin-off of ContentsKeysight Technologies.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Option Awards (1)

 

Restricted Stock Unit Awards (2)

 

Performance Share Awards

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of Shares or

 

Market Value of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of Securities Underlying

 

 

 

 

 

Units of Stock

 

Shares or Units

 

Number of Unearned

 

Market Value of

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unexercised Options (#)

 

Option Exercise

 

Option Expiration

 

That Have Not

 

That Have Not

 

Shares That Have

 

Shares That Have

 

 

Name

 

Grant Date

 

Exercisable

 

Unexercisable

 

Price ($)

 

Date

 

Vested (#)

 

Vested ($)

 

Not Vested (3) (#)

 

Not Vested ($)

 

 

Michael R. McMullen

 

11/17/2010

 

44,962

 

-

 

25.73

 

11/16/2020

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/17/2011

 

87,403

 

-

 

27.19

 

11/16/2021

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/21/2012

 

98,543

 

-

 

26.19

 

11/20/2022

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/20/2013

 

54,535

 

18,181

 

39.12

 

11/19/2023

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/19/2014

 

81,300

 

81,301

 

40.80

 

11/18/2024

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

3/18/2015

 

33,081

 

33,081

 

42.12

 

3/17/2025

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/18/2015

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

51,470

 

3,501,504

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

67,963

 

4,623,523

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/19/2014

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

36,577

 

2,488,333

 

 

 

 

3/18/2015

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

14,224

 

967,659

 

 

 

 

11/18/2015

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

52,143

 

3,547,288

 

 

 

 

11/18/2015

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

44,085

 

2,999,103

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

52,199

 

3,551,098

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

40,299

 

2,741,541

 

 

Total

 

 

 

399,824

 

132,563

 

 

 

 

 

119,433

 

8,125,027

 

239,527

 

16,295,022

 

 

Didier Hirsch

 

11/21/2012

 

90,000

 

-

 

26.19

 

11/20/2022

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/20/2013

 

57,484

 

19,163

 

39.12

 

11/19/2023

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/19/2014

 

47,425

 

47,425

 

40.80

 

11/18/2024

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/18/2015

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

22,303

 

1,517,273

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

25,243

 

1,717,281

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/19/2014

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

21,337

 

1,451,556

 

 

 

 

11/18/2015

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

22,595

 

1,537,138

 

 

 

 

11/18/2015

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

19,103

 

1,299,577

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

19,388

 

1,318,966

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

14,968

 

1,018,273

 

 

Total

 

 

 

194,909

 

66,588

 

 

 

 

 

47,546

 

3,234,554

 

97,391

 

6,625,510

 

 

Mark Doak

 

11/18/2009

 

6

 

-

 

21.53

 

11/17/2019

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/20/2013

 

-

 

3,146

 

39.12

 

11/19/2023

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/19/2014

 

-

 

24,842

 

40.80

 

11/18/2024

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/18/2015

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

13,297

 

904,595

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

17,912

 

1,218,553

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/19/2014

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

11,176

 

760,303

 

 

 

 

11/18/2015

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

13,470

 

916,364

 

 

 

 

11/18/2015

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

11,388

 

774,726

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

13,758

 

935,957

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

10,621

 

722,547

 

 

Total

 

 

 

6

 

27,988

 

 

 

 

 

31,209

 

2,123,148

 

60,413

 

4,109,897

 

 

Patrick Kaltenbach

 

11/20/2013

 

-

 

2,358

 

39.12

 

11/19/2023

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/20/2014

 

7,583

 

22,584

 

41.26

 

11/19/2024

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/18/2015

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

12,299

 

836,701

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

17,270

 

1,174,878

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/20/2014

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

10,160

 

691,185

 

 

 

 

11/18/2015

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

10,286

 

699,757

 

 

 

 

11/18/2015

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

12,166

 

827,653

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

12,953

 

881,193

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

10,000

 

680,300

 

 

Total

 

 

 

7,583

 

24,942

 

 

 

 

 

29,569

 

2,011,579

 

55,565

 

3,780,088

 

 

Jacob Thaysen

 

11/20/2014

 

-

 

22,583

 

41.26

 

11/19/2024

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/18/2015

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

7,028

 

478,115

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

12,925

 

879,288

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

11/20/2014

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

5,080

 

345,592

 

 

 

 

11/18/2015

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

6,952

 

472,945

 

 

 

 

11/18/2015

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

5,878

 

399,880

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

9,694

 

659,483

 

 

 

 

11/16/2016

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

7,484

 

509,137

 

 

Total

 

 

 

-

 

22,583

 

 

 

 

 

19,953

 

1,357,403

 

35,088

 

2,387,037

 

(1)

All options vest at the rate of 25% per year over four years.

48


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year 2015 Year End

Option Awards(1)

Restricted Stock
Unit Awards

Performance Share
Awards

  
   

Grant
Date

   


Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options (#)
   Option
Exercise
Price ($)
   Option
Vesting
Date
   Option
Expiration
Date
   
   

Number
of Shares
or Units

of Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(2)
    
Market
Value of
Shares

or Units
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
   Number of
Unearned
Shares

That Have
Not Vested
(#)(3)
    
Market
Value of
Shares

That Have
Not Vested
($)
  Name

Exercisable

Unexercisable

  Mark Doak   11/18/2009      6           0          $21.53     11/18/2010   11/17/2019              
11/17/201111,1803,730$27.1911/17/201211/16/2021
11/21/201207,938$26.1911/21/201311/20/2022
11/20/20133,1439,434$39.1211/20/201411/19/2023
 11/19/2014049,683$40.8011/19/201511/18/2024
11/21/20124,038$152,457
11/20/20133,496$131,992
9/17/20143,524$133,077
9/17/20145,241$197,884
11/19/201411,176$422,006
  Total14,32970,7850$027,475$1,037,416
 
  Henrik Ancher-Jensen11/19/2014024,841$40.8011/19/201511/18/2024
11/20/201310,925$412,513
11/19/20145,588$211,003
  Total024,8410$016,513$623,516
 
  Patrick Kaltenbach11/17/20113,6581,608$27.1911/17/201211/16/2021
11/21/20125,2006,571$26.1911/21/201311/20/2022
11/20/20132,3587,074$39.1211/20/201411/19/2023
11/20/2014045,167$41.2611/20/201511/19/2024
11/21/20123,341$126,152
11/20/20132,621$98,968
11/20/201410,160$383,642
  Total11,21660,4200$016,122$608,762
 
  William P. Sullivan11/17/20110100,258$27.1911/17/201211/16/2021
11/21/2012232,670232,672$26.1911/21/201311/20/2022
11/20/201383,526250,579$39.1211/20/201411/19/2023
11/19/20140184,281$40.8011/19/201511/18/2024
11/20/201335,641$1,345,804
11/21/2012118,346$4,468,745
11/20/201392,861$3,506,431
11/19/201462,182$2,347,992
  Total316,196767,79035,641$1,345,804273,389$10,323,168

____________________

(1)       

(2)

All share amounts reflect shares outstanding asRSUs vest at the rate of October 31, 2015. In November 2014, all outstanding shares from grants made prior to November 1, 2014 were adjusted due to the spin-off of Keysight Technologies.25% per year over four years.  

(2)       

(3)

Amounts reflect unvested restricted stock units. As of October 31, 2015. The remainder of Mr. Sullivan’s award will vest on November 19, 2015 and November 19, 2016.
(3)       

Amounts reflect multiple unvested performance share awards that are outstanding simultaneously as of the end of fiscal year 20152017 for each NEO under the LTP Program. TheLTPP. Since the FY14 – FY16 performance share awards granted on November 21, 2012 were vested and assessed on November 18, 2015. The performance share awards granted on November 20, 2013 will vest and be assessed in November 2016.paid out at 96% the previous year, the amounts are shown at target payout. The performance share awards granted on November 19, 2014 were vested and assessed on November 14, 2017. The performance share awards granted on November 18, 2015 will vest and be assessed in November 2017.



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION2018. The performance share awards granted on November 16, 2016 will vest and be assessed in November 2019.


Option Exercises and Stock Vested at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth information on restricted stock units and performance awards which vested during fiscal year 2017 and stock option exercises and stock vestingthat took place in fiscal year 20152017 and the value realized on the date of exercise, if any, by each of our NEOs.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal Year 2015
Restricted Stock &
Option AwardsRestricted Stock UnitsPerformance Awards
   Number ofNumber ofNumber of
Shares Acquired   Value Realized   Shares Acquired   Value Realized   Shares Acquired   Value Realized
on Exerciseon ExerciseUpon Vestingon VestingUpon Vestingon Vesting
Name(#)($)(#)($)(#)(1)($) (2)
Michael R. McMullen   43,130   $715,436    41,061    $1,693,3560$0
Didier Hirsch55,243$1,153,4742,530$104,3370$0
Mark Doak25,095$376,9780$00$0
Henrik Ancher-Jensen0$00$00$0
Patrick Kaltenbach2,249$36,2931,177$48,0220$0
William P. Sullivan404,640$5,987,52817,819$735,2120$0

____________________

 

 

 

Option Awards

 

Restricted Stock Unit Awards

 

Performance Awards

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

Number of

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares

 

Value Realized

 

Shares Acquired

Value Realized

 

Shares Acquired

 

Value Realized

 

 

 

 

Acquired on

 

on Exercise

 

Upon Vesting (1)

on Vesting (2)

 

Upon Vesting (3)

 

on Vesting (4)

 

 

Name

 

Exercise (#)

 

($)

 

(#)

($)

 

(#)

 

($)

 

 

Michael R. McMullen

 

82,511

 

2,810,167

 

17,569

791,308

 

101,602

 

6,854,071

 

 

Didier Hirsch

 

198,326

 

6,116,784

 

7,613

342,890

 

42,674

 

2,878,788

 

 

Mark Doak

 

38,241

 

772,033

 

4,538

204,392

 

22,352

 

1,507,866

 

 

Patrick Kaltenbach

 

29,845

 

667,255

 

4,099

184,619

 

20,320

 

1,370,787

 

 

Jacob Thaysen

 

-

 

-

 

2,342

105,484

 

10,160

 

685,394

 


(1)

Amounts

The amounts reflect the performancenumber of units that vested on November 16, 2016, however, these shares granted in fiscal year 2013 pursuantwere subject to the LTP Program for the fiscal year 2013-2015 performance period and paid out in calendar year 2015.a one-year post-vest holding period.

(2)

The market value of these awards is based on the closing price of Agilent’sour common stock on November 18, 2015.16, 2016.

(3)

Amounts reflect the performance shares granted in fiscal year 2015 pursuant to the LTPP for the fiscal year 2015-2017 performance period and paid out in calendar year 2017. Mr. Doak and Mr. Kaltenbach had elected to defer 4,470 and 19,304 shares respectively, into their Deferred Compensation Accounts.

(4)

The market value of these awards is based on the closing price of our common stock on November 14, 2017, the date of issuance of these shares.

49


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Pension Benefits

The following table shows the estimated present value of accumulated benefits, including years of service, payable at normal retirement age (65) to our NEOs under the Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan (“DPSP”), the Retirement Plancertain pension plans. Mr. Thaysen did not have an interest in any of our pension plans and the Supplemental Benefit Retirement Plan.there were no payments under any of our pension plans to any of our NEOs in fiscal year 2017.  To calculate an eligible employee’s years of service, the pension plans will bridge each eligible employee’s service, if any, with Hewlett-Packard Company prior to June 2, 2000 to that eligible employee’s service with Agilentus on or after June 2, 2000; the total years of service will reflect employment service from both Hewlett-Packard and Agilent,us, capped at 30 years of service. The cost of all threepension plans set forth below is paid entirely by Agilent.us. The present value of accumulated benefit is calculated using the assumptions under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 715: Compensation – Retirement Benefits for the fiscal year end measurement (as of October 31, 2015)2017). The present value is based on a lump sum interest rate of 6.00%5.5%, DPSP rate of return of 7.5%7.25% and the “applicable mortality table” described in section 417(e)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. See also Note 1513 to Agilent’sour consolidated financial statements in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015,2017, as filed with the SEC on December 18, 2015.

Pension Benefits
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
   Eligible for            Number      Present
FullDeferredSupplementalof YearsPaymentsValue of
Retirement

Profit-Sharing

Retirement

Benefit Plan

of Credited

During LastAccumulated
NameBenefits?Plan ($)Plan ($)($)

Service (#)

 

Fiscal Year ($)

Benefit ($)
Michael R. McMullenY $189,004 $786,972 $784,35530$0$1,760,330 
Didier HirschY$0$593,960 $527,44516$0$1,121,405 
Mark DoakY$180,956$688,753 $45,63230$0$915,341 
Henrik Ancher-JensenN$0$79,736 $45,061  2$0$124,798 
Patrick KaltenbachN$0$0 $0  0$0$0 
William P. SullivanY$626,932$408,501 $3,364,21930$0$4,399,652 



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


Retirement Plan21, 2017.

The Retirement Plan, which was closed to new participants as of November 1, 2014, guarantees a minimum retirement benefit payable at normal retirement age (the later of age 65 or termination). Benefits are accrued on a monthly basis as a lump sum payable at normal retirement age based on eligible pay and years of service up to a maximum of 30 years as follows:

Pension Benefits

 

 

 

Eligible for

 

 

Number of

 

Present

 

 

 

 

Full

 

 

Years of

 

Value of

 

 

 

 

Retirement

 

 

Credited

 

Accumulated

 

 

Name

 

Benefits?

 

 

Service (#)

 

Benefit ($)

 

 

Michael R. McMullen

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

191,050

 

 

U.S. Retirement Plan

 

Y

 

 

30

 

786,678

 

 

Supplemental Benefit Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

830,745

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,808,473

 

 

Didier Hirsch

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

U.S. Retirement Plan

 

Y

 

 

17

 

606,094

 

 

Supplemental Benefit Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

552,386

 

 

International Relocation Benefit Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

105,356

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,263,836

 

 

Mark Doak

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

182,916

 

 

U.S. Retirement Plan

 

Y

 

 

30

 

688,114

 

 

Supplemental Benefit Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

62,098

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

933,128

 

 

Patrick Kaltenbach

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

U.S. Retirement Plan

 

N

 

 

-

 

-

 

 

Supplemental Benefit Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

German Pension Plan

 

N

 

 

 

 

3,220,401

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,220,401

 

For participants who have fewer than 15 years of service:

11% × target pay at the end of the month

PLUS

5% × target pay at the end of the month in excess of 50% of the Social Security Wage Base

For participants who have 15 or more years of service:

14% × target pay at the end of the month

PLUS

5% × target pay at the end of the month in excess of 50% of the Social Security Wage Base

Benefits under the Retirement Plan are payable as either (a) a single life annuity for single participants or as (b) a 50% joint and survivor annuity for married participants. Participants may elect to receive payments at any time following termination or retirement and in the above forms or as an actuarially equivalent 75% or 100% joint and survivor annuity, or as a one-time lump sum. Payments made prior to normal retirement age will be reduced in accordance with the plan provisions.

All regular full-time or regular part-time employees who were employees of Agilent prior to November 1, 2014 automatically become participants in the Retirement Plan on the May 1 or November 1 following completion of two years of service.

Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan

The Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan is a closed, defined contribution plan. The Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan was created by Hewlett-Packard and covers participants’ service with Hewlett-Packard before November 1, 1993 and is used as a floor offset for the Retirement Plan for service prior to November 1, 1993. There have been no contributions into the plan since October 31, 1993.

For service prior to November 1, 1993 (if any), the benefit due is the greater of (i) the benefit defined by the Retirement Plan formula, or (ii) the annuity value of the Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan account balance. Therefore, for service prior to November 1, 1993, the Retirement Plan guarantees a minimum retirement benefit.

50


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Benefits under the Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan are payable at normal retirement age as either (i) a single life annuity for single participants, or (ii) a 50% joint and survivor annuity for married participants. Participants may elect to receive payments at any time following termination or retirement and in the above forms or as 75% or 100% joint and survivor annuity, or as a one-time lump sum.



TableRetirement Plan

The Retirement Plan, which was frozen for all participants as of ContentsApril 30, 2016, was available to all employees hired onto U.S. payroll before November 1, 2014 and guarantees a minimum retirement benefit payable at normal retirement age (the later of age 65 or termination). Benefits were accrued on a monthly basis as a lump sum payable at normal retirement age based on eligible pay and years of service up to a maximum of 30 years as follows:

For participants who have fewer than 15 years of service:

11% × target pay at the end of the month

PLUS

5% × target pay at the end of the month in excess of 50% of the Social Security Wage Base

For participants who have 15 or more years of service:

14% × target pay at the end of the month

PLUS

5% × target pay at the end of the month in excess of 50% of the Social Security Wage Base

Benefits under the Retirement Plan are payable as either (a) a single life annuity for single participants or as (b) a 50% joint and survivor annuity for married participants. Participants may elect to receive payments at any time following termination or retirement and in the above forms or as an actuarially equivalent 75% or 100% joint and survivor annuity, or as a one-time lump sum. Payments made prior to normal retirement age will be reduced in accordance with the plan provisions.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


Supplemental Benefit Retirement Plan

The Supplemental Benefit Retirement Plan, which was closed to newfrozen for all participants as of November 1, 2014,April 30, 2016, is an unfunded, non-qualified deferred compensation plan. Benefits payable under this plan are equal to the excess of the combined qualified Retirement Plan and Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan amount that would be payable in accordance with the terms of the Retirement Plan disregarding the benefit and compensation limitations imposed pursuant to sections 415 and 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Benefits under the Supplemental Benefit Retirement Plan are payable upon termination or retirement as follows:

Accruals prior to January 1, 2005 are paid in a single lump sum in the January following the fiscal year in which the participant takes his qualified Retirement Plan benefit.

Accruals prior to January 1, 2005 are paid in a single lump sum in the January following the fiscal year in which the participant takes his qualified Retirement Plan benefit.

Accruals after December 31, 2004 are paid based on the date the participant retires or terminates: in January immediately following if retirement or termination occurs during the first six months of the year; or in July if retirement or termination occurs during the second six months of the year. Participants will receive a benefit in the form of either five annual installments (if the lump sum value is at least $150,000); or in a single lump sum (if the lump sum value is less than $150,000).

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation in Last Fiscal Year

For fiscal year 2015, the non-qualified deferred compensation plan was available to all active employees on the US payroll with total target cash salary, including the short-term Performance-Based Compensation Plan, greater than or equal to $265,000.

There are three types of earnings that may be deferred under the program:

1.       100% of annual base pay earnings in excess of the IRS qualified plan limit of $265,000 for 2015;
2.95% of bonus earnings, discretionary and cash compensation paid under the Performance-Based Compensation Plan; and
3.95% of performance based compensation paid out in accordance with the terms of Agilent’s LTP Program. Awards under this program are paid out in the form of Agilent common stock.

Deferral elections may be made annually and are part of overall tax planning for many executives. There are several investment options available under the Plan, most of which mirror the investment choices under our tax-qualified 401(k) plan. All investment choices are made by the participant. Based on market performance, dividends and interest are credited to participants’ accounts from the funds that the participant has elected.

At the time participation is elected, employees must also elect payout in one of three forms, which can commence upon termination or be delayed by an additional one, two or three years following termination:

1.a single lump sum payment;
2.annual installments over a five-to-fifteen year period; or
3.a single lump sum payment in January or July on or after 2017.



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


Payouts are distributed to eligible participants in January of the year following termination, if termination occurs during the first six months of the calendar year. Otherwise, payouts are distributed to eligible participantsyear; or in July of the year following termination whereif retirement or termination occurs during the second halfsix months of the calendar year. No early distributions or withdrawals are allowed. When and if received,Participants will receive a participant in the LTP Program may elect to defer his or her shares through our 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan. The LTP Program shares are deferredbenefit in the form of Agilent common stock only. Ateither five annual installments (if the end oflump sum value is at least $150,000); or in a single lump sum (if the deferral period, the LTP Program shares are simply released to the executive.

We have established a rabbi trust as a source of funds to make payments under the non-qualified deferred compensation plan. As of October 31, 2015, the rabbi trust with Fidelity Management Trust Company was fully funded, so therelump sum value is no need for additional funding.less than $150,000).

The table below provides information on the non-qualified deferred compensation of the NEOs for fiscal year 2015.51

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
       Executive       Registrant       Aggregate              Aggregate
ContributionsContributionsEarnings inAggregateBalance at
in Last Fiscalin Last FiscalLast FiscalWithdrawals/Fiscal
YearYearYearDistributionsYear-End
Name($) (1)($)($) (2)($)($)(3)
Michael R. McMullen$0$0$525$0$10,610
Didier Hirsch$1,310,163$0-$1,277,386$0$6,534,635
Mark Doak$105,430$0-$16,679$0$188,221
Henrik Ancher-Jensen$0$0$0$0$0
Patrick Kaltenbach$0$0$0$0$0
William P. Sullivan$0$0-$3,633,666$0$12,136,333

____________________

(1)       The salary portion of the amounts reflected above is included in the amount reported as salary in the “Summary Compensation Table.”
(2)Amounts reflected are not included in the “Summary Compensation Table” because the earnings are not “above-market.” These amounts include dividends, interest and change in market value.
(3)Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End for Mr. Hirsch includes $166,386, equivalent to the aggregate lump sum balance for the Agilent Technologies, Inc. France Pension Plan (as described below). The present value is of accumulated benefit based on an interest rate of 3.00% and rate of return of 3.64% (as of January 1, 2015). The France Pension Plan is only valued once a year, and the benefit value as of October 31, 2015 is the same as that on January 1, 2015.

Agilent Technologies, Inc. France Pension Plan

The Agilent Technologies France Pension Plan is a defined contribution plan created by Hewlett-Packard in 1982 and is open to all exempt employees in France. Since Mr. Hirsch was originally employed by Hewlett-Packard France, he is the only NEO participating in this plan. The French Pension Scheme is not a tax-qualified defined contribution plan under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.

Eligible employees must have Pensionable Salary above eight times the French Social Security Ceiling (“Tranche C” threshold) to be a participant of this plan. Agilent contributes 5% of Pensionable Salary and eligible employees contribute 3% of Pensionable Salary. Agilent no longer contributes to this plan on Mr. Hirsch’s behalf. Benefits under this plan are payable at the plan’s normal retirement age (age 65) or from age 60 with a 5% reduction per annum as a lifetime annuity resulting from the accumulated contributions and actual return on investments. Should the participant die prior to receiving benefits, the surviving spouse would receive 60% of the annuity accrued at the time of the participant’s death (death in service) or 60% of the actual annuity (death in retirement). In case of employment termination the accrued benefit retirement annuity and, where appropriate, contingent spouse’s pension is deferred to normal retirement age.



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


Agilent Technologies, Inc. International Relocation Benefit Plan

The Agilent Technologies, Inc. International Relocation Benefit Plan (IRBP) is an unfunded program that was created by Hewlett-Packard in 1989 and was open to employees who transferred from one country payroll to another at the company’s request prior to December 1, 2001. Mr. Hirsch transferred from France to the United States at the company’s request in September 1999. Upon transfer to the US payroll, he became eligible to participate in the company’s US retirement programs and was no longer eligible to accrue benefits under the France Pension Plan. As he transferred at the company’s request, he became eligible for the IRBP. The objective of the IRBP is to mitigate the possible estimated retirement income loss under country social security plans, governmental programs and our retirement schemes to an employee who has transferred internationally on a permanent, company-sponsored basis. The plan was closed to new participants effective November 30, 2001. Effective May 1, 2012, the IRBP benefit was frozen for all participants. Mr. Hirsch’s benefit was $105,356 as of October 31, 2017. The frozen IRBP benefit will accrue interest at 2% annum until his retirement. Any loss of retirement income resulting from Mr. Hirsch’s no longer accruing benefits under the foregoing French arrangements will be paid to Mr. Hirsch in a single lump sum upon retirement from the company’s general assets as soon as administratively feasible.

Agilent Technologies, Inc. German Pension Plan

The Agilent Technologies German Pension Plan (PPL) is a Defined Benefit plan inherited from Hewlett-Packard and has been closed to new entrants since Dec 31, 1994. Mr. Kaltenbach is the only NEO participating in this plan. The plan offers retirement, disability and death benefits. Benefits under the plan are calculated as 0.5% of the last two years Pensionable Salary up to the SSC (Social Security Ceiling) plus 2% of the last 2 years Pension Salary in excess of the SSC, multiplied by the pensionable service (max 40 years). There is no employee contribution. Benefits are payable at age 65 with accrual reductions before age 60. The plan also provides death and disability coverage (60% for widow and widower and 15% for orphans).

The Agilent Technologies, Inc. International Relocation BenefitNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation

For fiscal year 2017, the 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan

The Agilent Technologies, Inc. International Relocation Benefit Plan (“IRBP”) is an unfunded program that was created by Hewlett-Packard in 1989 and was openavailable to all active employees who transferred from one country payroll to another at the Company’s request prior to December 1, 2001. Mr. Hirsch transferred from France to the United States at the Company’s request in September 1999. Upon transfer toon the US payroll he became eligiblewith total target cash salary, including the short-term Performance-Based Compensation Plan, greater than or equal to participate$270,000.

There are three types of earnings that may be deferred under the program:

1.

100% of annual base pay earnings in excess of the IRS qualified plan limit of $270,000 for 2017;

2.

95% of bonus earnings, discretionary and cash compensation paid under the Performance-Based Compensation Plan; and

3.

95% of performance based compensation paid out in accordance with the terms of our LTPP. Awards under this program are paid out in the form of our common stock.

Deferral elections may be made annually and are part of overall tax planning for many executives. There are several investment options available under the Plan, most of which mirror the investment choices under our tax-qualified 401(k) plan. All investment choices are made by the participant. Based on market performance, dividends and interest are credited to participants’ accounts from the funds that the participant has elected.

At the time participation is elected, employees must also elect payout in one of three forms, which can commence upon termination or be delayed by an additional one, two or three years following termination:

1.

a single lump sum payment;

2.

annual installments over a five to fifteen-year period; or

3.

a single lump sum payment in January or July on or after 2019.

The company currently provides two types of employer contributions. The first is a matching contribution up to 6% of deferred base pay amounts above the IRS qualified plan limit. The second is a transitional company contribution (DCPTCC) which is a formulaic contribution put in place due to the freeze of the U.S. pension and supplemental benefit retirement plans respectively.  Contributions made by the company to our NEOs are detailed in the Company’s US retirement programstable that follows.

Payouts are distributed to eligible participants in January of the year following termination, if termination occurs during the first six months of the calendar year. Otherwise, payouts are distributed to eligible participants in July of the year following termination

52


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

where termination occurs during the second half of the calendar year. No early distributions or withdrawals are allowed. When and was no longer eligibleif received, a participant in the LTPP may elect to accrue benefitsdefer his or her shares through our 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan. The LTPP shares are deferred in the form of our common stock only. At the end of the deferral period, the LTPP shares are released to the executive.

We have established a rabbi trust as a source of funds to make payments under the France Pension Plan.non-qualified deferred compensation plan. As he transferred at the Company’s request, he became eligible for the IRBP. The objective of the IRBP is to mitigate the possible estimated retirement income loss under country social security plans, governmental programs and Agilent retirement schemes to an employee who has transferred internationally on a permanent, company-sponsored basis. The plan was closed to new participants effective November 30, 2001. Effective May 1, 2012, the IRBP benefit was frozen for all participants. Mr. Hirsch’s benefit was $98,422 as of October 31, 2015. 2017, the rabbi trust with Fidelity Management Trust Company was fully funded, so there is no need for additional funding.

The frozen IRBP benefit will accrue interest at 2% annum until his retirement. Any losstable below provides information on the non-qualified deferred compensation of retirement income resulting from Mr. Hirsch’s no longer accruing benefits under the foregoing French arrangements will be paid to Mr. Hirsch in a single lump sum upon retirement from the Company’s general assets as soon as administratively feasible.NEOs for fiscal year 2017.

 

 

 

Executive

 

Company

 

Aggregate

 

Aggregate

 

 

 

 

Contributions in

 

Contributions in

 

Earnings in Last

 

Balance at Fiscal

 

 

 

 

Last Fiscal Year (1)

 

Last Fiscal Year

 

Fiscal Year (2)

 

Year-End (3)

 

 

Name

 

($)

 

($)

 

($)

 

($)

 

 

Michael R. McMullen

 

40,950

 

40,950

 

9,169

 

98,259

 

 

Didier Hirsch

 

17,325

 

35,231

 

3,210,904

 

10,632,640

 

 

Mark Doak

 

379,835

 

10,763

 

177,908

 

973,014

 

 

Patrick Kaltenbach

 

291,259

 

14,424

 

80,110

 

408,303

 

 

Jacob Thaysen

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(1)

The salary portion of the amounts reflected above is included in the amount reported as salary in the “Summary Compensation Table.”

(2)

Amounts reflected are not included in the “Summary Compensation Table” because the earnings are not “above-market.” These amounts include dividends, interest and change in market value.

Termination and Change of Control Arrangements

Set forth below is a description of the plans and agreements that could result in potential payments to the NEOs in the case of their termination of employment and/or a change of control of Agilent.the company.

Change of Control Agreements

Each NEO has signed a Change of Control Agreement. Under these agreements, in the event that within 24 months after a change of control of Agilent, Agilentthe company, the company or its successor terminates the employment of such executive without cause or an event constituting good reason occurs and the executive resigns within three months after such an event, the executive will be entitled to: (i) two times, or solely with respect to the CEO, three times, the sum of such executive’s base salary and target bonus, (ii) payment of $80,000 for medical insurance premiums, (iii) full vesting of all outstanding options and stock awards not subject to performance-based vesting, and (iv) a prorated portion of any bonus. The Compensation Committee amended our forms of change of control agreement to remove tax gross-ups of parachute payments. These amended forms of agreements are used with any newly executed agreements after July 14, 2009. In September 2014, the Compensation Committee further amended these agreements to expand the change of control definition, add anticipatory termination language, more clearly define how the prorated bonus is calculated and clarify treatment of LTPP awards.



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


For agreements entered into before July 14, 2009 and to the extent that the payment of these benefits triggers the excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code or any comparable federal, state, local or foreign excise tax, Agilentthe company will be responsible for payment of any additional tax liability arising from the application of such excise tax, subject to certain exceptions. Only one officer, not the CEO, has an agreement entered into prior to July 14, 2009 that contains a tax gross-up provision. In exchange for such consideration, this executive has agreed to execute a release of all of the executive’s rights and claims relating to his or her employment.

Under the current agreements, a “change of control” means the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) the sale, exchange, lease or other disposition or transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of Agilentthe company to a third party; (ii) a merger or consolidation involving Agilentthe company in which theour stockholders of Agilent immediately prior to such merger or consolidation are not the owners of more than 75% of the total voting power of the outstanding voting securities of Agilentthe company after the transaction; (iii) the acquisition of beneficial ownership of at least 25% of the total voting power of the outstanding voting securities of Agilent the company

53


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

by a third person; or (iv) Individuals who, as of Effective Date, constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board.

“Good reason” means (i) the reduction of the officer’s rate of pay, other than reductions that apply to employees generally and variable and performance reductions; (ii) reduction in benefits or failure to receive the same benefits as similarly situated employees; (iii) a change in the officer’s duties, responsibilities, authority, job title, or reporting relationships resulting in a significant diminution of position, subject to certain exceptions; (iv) the relocation to a worksite that is more than 35 miles from his prior worksite and which increases the distance between such executive’s home and principal office by more than 35 miles, unless executive accepts such relocation opportunity; (v) the failure or refusal of a successor to Agilentthe company to assume Agilent’sour obligations under the agreement, or (vi) a material breach by Agilentthe company or any successor to Agilentthe company of any of the material provisions of the agreement.

Under these agreements, “cause” means misconduct, including: (i) conviction of any felony or any crime involving moral turpitude or dishonesty which has a material adverse effect on Agilent’sour business or reputation; (ii) repeated unexplained or unjustified absences from Agilent;the company; (iii) refusal or willful failure to act in accordance with any specific directions, orders or policies of Agilentthe company that has a material adverse effect on Agilent’sour business or reputation; (iv) a material and willful violation of any state or federal law that would materially injure the business or reputation of Agilentthe company as reasonably determined by the Board; (v) participation in a fraud or act of dishonesty against Agilentthe company which has a material adverse effect on Agilent’sour business or reputation; (vi) conduct by the officer which the Board determines demonstrates gross unfitness to serve; or (vii) intentional, material violation by the officer of any contract between the officer and Agilentthe company or any statutory duty of the officer to Agilentthe company that is not corrected within thirty days after written notice to the officer.

In addition, in the event of a change of control:

       1.       

1.

Participants in the LTP ProgramLTPP would receive at the earlier of the end of the performance period or termination of the program, an LTP ProgramLTPP payout equivalent to the greater of the target award or the accrued amount of the payout, and in the case of termination during the first 12 months of the performance cycle, prorated for the amount of time elapsed during the first twelve months of the performance period; and

       2.

2.

Participants who receive restricted stock unit awards would vest in full immediately prior to the closing of the transaction, unless the awards are assumed, converted or replaced in full by the successor corporation or a parent or subsidiary of the successor.



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


Termination and Change of Control Table

For each of the NEOs, the table below estimates the amount of compensation that would be paid in the event of a change of control of the following:company occurs and executive is terminated without cause or voluntarily terminates at a time when an event constituting good reason has occurred, in both cases either within 24 months following the change of control or within three months prior to such change of control.

       i.a change of control of Agilent occurs and executive is terminated without cause or voluntarily terminates at a time when an event constituting good reason has occurred, in both cases either within 24 months following the change of control or within 3 months prior to such change of control;
       ii.a voluntary termination by executive or an involuntary termination of the executive by Agilent with or without cause;
       iii.the termination of executive due to death or disability;
       iv.       the retirement of executive; or
       v.the termination of executive as part of a Workforce Management Program.

The amounts shown assume that each of the terminations was effective October 31, 2015.2017.

(i)(ii)
InvoluntaryVoluntary
Termination orTermination or
Resignation forInvoluntary(v)
Good Cause in  Termination(iii)    Workforce
Connection withwith or without  Death or(iv)Management
a Change ofCause

Disability

 

Retirement

Program
Name   Type of BenefitControl ($)($)($)(1)($)(2)($)(3)
Michael R.Cash Severance Payments$6,270,000  $0 $0$0$0
McMullenContinuation of Benefits(4)$80,000  $0$0$0$0
Stock Award Acceleration$4,542,113  $0$4,542,113$0$0
Stock Award Cont’d Vesting$0  $0$0$4,542,113$4,542,113
Stock Option Acceleration(5)$801,075  $0$801,075$0$801,075
Stock Option Cont’d Vesting(5)$0  $0$0$801,075$0
Pension Benefits(6)$1,198,011    $1,198,011$1,198,011$1,198,011$1,198,011
Total Termination Benefits:$12,891,199  $1,198,011$6,541,199$6,541,199$6,541,199
 
DidierCash Severance Payments$2,160,000  $0$0$0$0
Hirsch(7)Continuation of Benefits(4)$80,000  $0$0$0$0
Stock Award Acceleration$2,635,276  $0$2,635,276$0$0
Stock Award Cont’d Vesting$0  $0$0$2,635,276$2,635,276
Stock Option Acceleration(5)$862,164  $0$862,164$0$0
Stock Option Cont’d Vesting(5)$0  $0$0$862,164$862,164
Pension Benefits(6)$1,192,825  $1,192,825$1,192,825$1,192,825$1,192,825
Excise Tax Gross-Up(8)$0  $0$0$0$0
Total Termination Benefits:$6,930,265  $1,192,825$4,690,265$4,690,265$4,690,265
 
Mark DoakCash Severance Payments$1,530,000  $0$0$0$0
Continuation of Benefits(4)$80,000  $0$0$0$0
Stock Award Acceleration$1,037,416  $0$1,037,416$0$0
Stock Award Cont’d Vesting$0  $0$0$1,037,418$1,037,418
Stock Option Acceleration(5)$131,269  $0$131,269$0$0
Stock Option Cont’d Vesting(5)$0  $0$0$131,269$131,269
Pension Benefits(6)$808,204  $808,204$808,204$808,204$808,204
Total Termination Benefits:$3,586,889  $808,204$1,976,889$1,976,889$1,976,889


 

 

 

Cash Severance

Continuation of

Stock Award

Stock Option

Pension

Excise Tax

Total Termination

 

Name

 

Payments

Benefits (1)

Acceleration

Acceleration (2)

Benefits (3)

Gross-Up (5)

Benefits

 

Michael R. McMullen

 

7,590,000

80,000

24,420,049

3,596,568

1,412,405

-

37,099,021

 

Didier Hirsch (4)

 

2,268,000

80,000

9,860,064

1,845,385

1,277,732

3,199,258

18,530,439

 

Mark Doak

 

1,890,000

80,000

6,233,046

767,399

973,188

-

9,943,632

 

Patrick Kaltenbach

 

1,926,000

80,000

5,791,667

672,743

3,220,401

-

11,690,811

 

Jacob Thaysen

 

1,800,000

80,000

3,744,439

604,547

-

-

6,228,986


Table of Contents

(1)

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


(i)(ii)
InvoluntaryVoluntary
Termination orTermination or
Resignation forInvoluntary(v)
Good Cause inTermination(iii)Workforce
Connection withwith or withoutDeath or(iv)Management
a Change ofCauseDisabilityRetirement Program
NameType of BenefitControl ($)($)($)(1)($)(2)($)(3)
HenrikCash Severance Payments$1,440,000$0$0$0$0
Ancher-Continuation of Benefits(4)$80,000$0$0$0$0
JensenStock Award Acceleration$623,516$0$623,516$0$0
Stock Award Cont’d Vesting$0$0$0$623,516$623,516
Stock Option Acceleration(5)$0$0$0$0$0
Stock Option Cont’d Vesting(5)$0$0$0$0$0
Pension Benefits(6)$60,767$60,767$60,767$60,767$60,767
Total Termination Benefits:$2,204,283$60,767$684,283$684,283$684,283
 
PatrickCash Severance Payments(9)$1,504,561$0$0$0$0
KaltenbachContinuation of Benefits(4)$80,000$0$0$0$0
Stock Award Acceleration$608,762$0$608,762$0$0
Stock Award Cont’d Vesting$0$0$0$608,762$608,762
Stock Option Acceleration(5)$93,023$0$93,023$0$93,023
Stock Option Cont’d Vesting(5)$0$0$0$93,023$0
Pension Benefits(6)$0$0$0$0$0
Total Termination Benefits:$2,286,346$0$701,785$701,785$701,785
 
William P.Cash Severance Payments$4,725,000$0$0$0$0
Sullivan(10)Continuation of Benefits(4)$80,000$0$0$0$0
Stock Award Acceleration$11,668,972$0$11,668,972$0$0
Stock Award Cont’d Vesting$0$0$0$11,668,972$11,668,972
Stock Option Acceleration(5)$3,751,742$0$3,751,742$0$0
Stock Option Cont’d Vesting(5)$0$0$0$3,751,742$3,751,742
Pension Benefits(6)$5,230,677$5,230,677$5,230,677$5,230,677$5,230,677
Total Termination Benefits:$25,456,391$5,230,677$20,651,391$20,651,391$20,651,391
____________________

(1)     Under the 2009 Stock Plan and the LTP Program, if an employee dies or is fully disabled, his or her unvested stock options and stock awards shall fully vest. In both cases, unvested stock awards under the LTP Program will be paid out only to the extent the performance goals are satisfied.
(2)Under the 2009 Stock Plan and the LTP Program, if an employee retires from Agilent, all unvested restricted stock awards and/or stock options continue to vest per the original terms of the grant. Unvested stock awards under the LTP Program will be paid out only to the extent the performance goals are satisfied. As of October 31, 2015, Mr. Hirsch, Mr. Doak and Mr. Sullivan were eligible for such continued vesting upon retirement.
(3)If an employee is part of a Workforce Management Program, all unvested stock options fully vest upon termination and all unvested restricted stock awards continue to vest per the original terms of the grant. Unvested stock awards under the LTP Program will be paid out only to the extent the performance goals are satisfied. If an employee is retiree eligible and part of a Workforce Management Program, all unvested stock options and unvested restricted stock units continue to vest.
(4)Flat lump sum benefit for healthcare expenses, including additional health plan premium payments that may result from termination in the event of change of control.

(5)

(2)

Calculated using the in-the-money value of unvested options as of October 31, 2015,2017, the last business day of Agilent’sour last completed fiscal year. The closing price of Agilentour common stock as of October 31, 20152017 was $37.76.$68.03.

(6)

(3)

For information regarding potential payments upon termination under the 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan and the Retirement Plan, the Supplemental Benefit Retirement Plan, and the Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan and the German Pension Plan, in which our NEOs participate, see “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation in Last Fiscal Year” and “Pension Benefits” above.

54




Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


(7)     

(4)

In the case of Mr. Hirsch, to the extent that the payment of the listed benefits triggers the excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code or any comparable federal, state, local or foreign excise tax, Agilentwe will be responsible for payment of any additional tax liability arising from the application of such excise tax. However, Mr. Hirsch shall not be entitled to receive a gross-up payment if (i) the payment of the listed benefits may be reduced to an amount (the “Reduced Amount”) sufficient to result in no portion of such payment being subject to an excise tax, and (ii) after reducing such payment by the Reduced Amount, the executive would receive, on a pre-tax basis, an amount not less than 90% of the value of the unreduced payment on a pre-taxed basis.

(8)

(5)

We determined the amount of the excise tax payment in accordance with the provisions of Section 280G of the Code. We utilized the following key assumptions to determine the tax gross-up payment: (i) the interest rate assumption was 120% of the applicable federal rate effective for the month of October 2015,2017, compounded semiannually; (ii) a statutory federal income tax rate of 39.6%, Medical tax rate of 2.35%, California income tax rate of 13.3%; (iii) Section 280G “base amount” was determined based on average W-2 compensation for the period from 2010-2014;2012-2016; and (iv) equity grants made within one year of transaction were in the ordinary course of business and were not in contemplation of a transaction.

(9)Since Mr. Kaltenbach lived in Germany during fiscal year 2015, his amount of cash severance payments was determined based on two times (i) his fiscal year 2015 base salary of 379,905 Euro and (ii) his target bonus of 80% of base salary, which was then converted from Euro to U.S. dollars based on the exchange rate in effect on the last day of fiscal year 2015, or 1.101 U.S. dollars per Euro.
(10)Mr. Sullivan retired as Chief Executive Officer effective March 18, 2015 and continued his employment with Agilent as a senior advisor from March 18, 2015 through October 31, 2015. Notwithstanding the inclusion of the various termination scenarios in the table above, based on his retirement effective October 31, 2015, he is only eligible for the benefits with respect to the retirement scenario set forth above.


55


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
       The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material,” to be “filed” with the SEC, or to be subject to Regulation 14A or Regulation 14C (other than as provided in Item 407 of Regulation S-K) or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in future filings with the SEC except to the extent that Agilent specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
       Agilent’s executive compensation program is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”). The Compensation Committee, which is composed entirely of independent, non-employee directors, is responsible for approving and reporting to the Board on all elements of compensation for the executive officers. In this regard, the Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement with management. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into Agilent’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Submitted by:
Compensation Committee
Koh Boon Hwee, Chairperson
Sue H. Rataj
George A. Scangos, Ph.D.
Tadataka Yamada, M.D.



Table of Contents

APPROVAL OF NAMEDPROPOSAL 3 - ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION


PROPOSALPROPOSAL 3 —

NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF AGILENT’SOUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


TheOur stockholders of Agilent are entitled to cast an advisory vote at the Annual Meeting to approve the compensation of the Company’sour named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement. The stockholder vote is an advisory vote only and is not binding on Agilentthe company or its Board of Directors. The Companycompany currently intends to submit the compensation of the Company’scompany’s named executive officers annually, consistent with the advisory vote of the stockholders at the Company’scompany’s 2011 and 2017 Annual Meeting.Meetings.

Although the vote is non-binding, the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors value your opinions and will consider the outcome of the vote in establishing compensation philosophy and making future compensation decisions.

As described more fully in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and in “Executive Compensation” sections of the proxy statement, the Company’sour named executive officers, as identified on page 3028 are compensated in a manner consistent with our business strategy, competitive practice, sound compensation governance principles and stockholder interests and concerns. Our compensation policies and decisions are focused on pay-for-performance.

We are requesting your non-binding vote to approve the compensation of the Company’sour named executive officers as described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Executive Compensation” sections of the proxy statement.

Vote Required

The affirmativeadvisory vote of a majorityregarding approval of the sharescompensation of Agilent common stock present or represented by proxy and voting at the annual meeting, together withour named executive officers requires the affirmative vote of a majority of shares present at the required quorum, is required for approval ofannual meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as votes against this proposal. If you own shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record, you must instruct your bank, broker or other holder of record howBroker non-votes will have no effect on this proposal as brokers are not entitled to vote on such proposal in order for them to vote your shares so that your vote can be counted on this proposal.the absence of voting instructions from the beneficial owner.

Agilent’sThe Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the approval of the compensation of
Agilent’s
our
named executive officers for fiscal 2015.
2017.

56




Table of Contents

AMENDMENTS TO OUR CERTIFICATEPROPOSAL 4 - RATIFICATION OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS TO DECLASSIFY THE BOARDINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


PROPOSALPROPOSAL 4 —

APPROVALRATIFICATION OF AMENDMENTS TO OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS TO DECLASSIFY THE BOARDINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


The Company’s AmendedAudit and Restated CertificateFinance Committee of Incorporation (“Certificate”) and Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”) currently provide that the Board will be classified into three classes, as nearly equal in number as possible, with one class to be elected by the stockholders each year. As part of the Company’s commitment to effective governance practices, management and the Board undertook a review of current corporate governance trends and considered the view held by many institutional stockholders that transitioning to an annually elected board is preferable to maintaining a classified board. After careful consideration the Board has determined thatappointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit its consolidated financial statements for the 2018 fiscal year. During the 2017 fiscal year, PwC served as our independent registered public accounting firm and also provided certain tax and other non-audit services. Although we are not required to seek stockholder approval of this appointment, the Board believes it to be sound corporate governance to do so. If the appointment is appropriate to proposenot ratified, the Audit and Finance Committee will investigate the reasons for stockholder consideration amendmentsrejection and will reconsider the appointment.

Representatives of PwC are expected to our Certificate and Bylaws that, if adopted, would eliminateattend the classified structure of our Board over a three-year period.

If this proposal is approved by the requisite percentage of stockholders, the Company will transition to a declassified structure under which current directors will serve out their remaining terms prior to standing for election and the entire Board will stand for election annually beginning in 2019. As part of the transition, at the Annual Meetings of Stockholders in 2017 and 2018, each of the Class II and Class III directors, respectively, will begin standing for annual election. The proposed amendments will not affect the unexpired term of any director elected prior to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2017.

The proposed amendments to Article VII of the Certificate and Article III of the Bylaws are attached hereto as Annexes A and B, respectively.

If the requisite percentage of stockholders approve the amendments, the Company anticipates filing the amended Certificate with the Delaware Secretary of State promptly following the Annual Meeting. Additionally, the Bylawsmeeting where they will be amendedavailable to respond to questions and, restatedif they desire, to reflect these changes thereafter.make a statement.

Vote Required

The appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of a majority of shares present at the holders of at least eighty percent (80%)annual meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal. The approval of the outstandingappointment of PwC is a routine proposal on which a broker or other nominee is generally empowered to vote in the absence of voting stock ofinstructions from the Company is required for approval ofbeneficial owner, so broker non-votes are unlikely to result from this proposal.

Agilent’sThe Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the approvalratification of the proposed amendments toAudit and Finance Committee’s appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as
our
Certificate and Bylaws to declassify the Board.
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

57




Table of Contents

COMMON STOCK OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENTAUDIT MATTERS

Audit Matters

Fee
s Paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees charged to the company by PwC for audit services rendered in connection with the audited consolidated financial statements and reports for the 2017 and 2016 fiscal years and for other services rendered during the 2017 and 2016 fiscal years to the company and its subsidiaries, as well as all out-of-pocket costs incurred in connection with these services:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% of

 

 

 

% of

 

 

Fee Category:

Fiscal 2017

 

Total

 

Fiscal 2016

 

Total

 

 

Audit Fees

$4,005,000

 

94.2%

 

$4,492,000

 

91.6%

 

 

Audit-Related Fees

193,000

 

4.5%

 

343,000

 

7.0%

 

 

Tax Fees

51,000

 

1.2%

 

66,000

 

1.3%

 

 

All Other Fees

4,000

 

0.1%

 

3,000

 

0.1%

 

 

Total Fees

$4,253,000

 

100%

 

$4,904,000

 

100%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Audit Fees: Consists of fees billed for professional services rendered for the integrated audit of our consolidated financial statements and its internal control over financial reporting and review of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports. Fiscal 2017 and 2016 fees also consist of fees billed for services that are normally provided by PwC in connection with statutory reporting and regulatory filings or engagements and attest services, except those not required by statute or regulation.

Audit-Related Fees: Consists of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services include employee benefit plan audits, accounting consultations in connection with acquisitions and divestitures, attest services that are not required by statute or regulation, and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards. Fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016 audit-related fees reflect additional fees of $150,000 and $300,000, respectively, for services performed by PwC.  Fiscal 2017 audit-related fees were related to system integration of the Dako acquisition while fiscal 2016 audit-related fees were related to the implementation of a new financial system.

Tax Fees: Consists of fees billed for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. These services include assistance regarding federal, state and international tax compliance, tax audits and appeals, customs and duties, mergers and acquisitions and international tax planning.

All Other Fees: Consists of fees for all other services other than those reported above.  

In making its recommendation to ratify the appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2018, the Audit and Finance Committee has considered whether services other than audit and audit-related services provided by PwC are compatible with maintaining the independence of PwC.

Policy on Preapproval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit and Finance Committee’s policy is to preapprove all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Preapproval is generally provided for up to one year and any preapproval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is subject to a specific budget. The Audit and Finance Committee has delegated its preapproval authority up to a specified maximum to the Chairperson of the Audit and Finance Committee, Paul N. Clark, who may preapprove all audit and permissible non-audit services so long as his preapproval decisions are reported to the Audit and Finance Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

58


AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit and Finance Committee Report does not constitute soliciting material and shall not be deemed to be filed or incorporated by reference into any other company filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates the Audit and Finance Committee Report by reference therein.

AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

During fiscal year 2017, the Audit and Finance Committee of the Board reviewed the quality and integrity of the company’s consolidated financial statements, the effectiveness of its system of internal control over financial reporting, its compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the qualifications and independence of its independent registered public accounting firm, the performance of its internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm and other significant financial matters. Each of the Audit and Finance Committee members satisfies the definition of independent director and is financially literate as established in the New York Stock Exchange. In addition, the Board of Directors has identified Paul N. Clark as the Audit and Finance Committee’s “Financial Expert.” The company operates with a November 1 to October 31 fiscal year. The Audit and Finance Committee met twelve times, including telephone meetings, during the 2017 fiscal year.

The Audit and Finance Committee’s work is guided by a written charter that the Board has approved. The Audit and Finance Committee regularly reviews its charter to ensure that it is meeting all relevant audit committee policy requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the New York Stock Exchange. You can access the latest Audit and Finance Committee charter by clicking on “Governance Policies” in the “Corporate Governance” section of the Web page at www.investor.agilent.com or by writing to us at Agilent Technologies, Inc., 5301 Stevens Creek Blvd., Santa Clara, California 95051, Attention: Investor Relations.

The Audit and Finance Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the company’s audited consolidated financial statements and its internal controls over financial reporting. The Audit and Finance Committee has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, during the 2017 fiscal year, the matters required to be discussed by AS 1301 (Communications with Audit Committees), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and approved by the SEC.

The Audit and Finance Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit and Finance Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP its independence from the company. Based on the review and discussions noted above, the Audit and Finance Committee recommended to the Board that the company’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017, and be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Submitted by:

Audit and Finance Committee

Paul N. Clark, Chairperson

Robert J. Herbold

Daniel K. Podolsky, M.D.

Sue H. Rataj

59


BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP

COMMON STOCK OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENTOWNERSHIP

Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

The following table sets forth information, as of December 31, 2015,January 23, 2018, concerning each person or group known by Agilent,us, based on filings pursuant to Section 13(d) or (g) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stockcommon stock

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Amount and Nature

Percent of Class

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.

35,472,940

28,223,360 (1)

10.5%

8.7% (1)

100 E. Pratt Street

Baltimore, MD 21202

FMR LLC

23,189,364

BlackRock, Inc.

21,871,854 (2)

6.915%

6.8% (2)

245 Summer Street

Boston, MA 02210
BlackRock, Inc.21,338,354(3)6.4%

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10022

The Vanguard Group

17,939,853(4)

5.35%

21,380,085 (3)

6.64% (3)

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

FMR LLC

20,784,414 (4)

6.459% (4)

245 Summer Street

Boston, MA 02210


_______________________

(1)

Based solely on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 20156, 2017 by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. The Schedule 13G/A indicates that T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 8,452,2397,296,877 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 35,472,94028,195,160 shares. These securities are owned by various individual and institutional investors including T. Rowe Price International Ltd. and T. Rowe Price Mutual Funds which T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. serves as an investment adviser with power to direct investments and/or sole power to vote the securities. For purposes of the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. is deemed to be a beneficial owner of such securities; however, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. expressly disclaims that it is, in fact, the beneficial owner of such securities.

(2)

Based solely on information contained in a Schedule 13G13G/A filed with the SEC on January 19, 2017 by BlackRock, Inc. The Schedule 13G/A indicates that BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 18,805,531 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 21,871,854 shares.

(3)

Based solely on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 20159, 2017 by The Vanguard Group. The Schedule 13G/A indicates that The Vanguard Group has sole voting power with respect to 513,662 shares, shared voting power with respect to 58,572 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 20,814,931 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 565,154 shares.

(4)

Based solely on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017 by FMR LLC. The Schedule 13G13G/A indicates that FMR LLC has sole voting power with respect to 2,857,2991,249,678 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 23,189,36420,784,414 shares. The Schedule 13G filing reflects the securities beneficially owned, or that may be deemed to be beneficially owned, by FMR LLC, certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates, and other companies (collectively, the “FMR Reporters”). The filing does not reflect securities, if any, beneficially owned by certain other companies whose beneficial ownership of securities is disaggregated from that of the FMR Reporters.

(3)Based solely on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 25, 2016 by BlackRock, Inc. The Schedule 13G/A indicates that BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 18,309,634 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 21,338,354 shares.
(4)Based solely on information contained in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 11, 2015 by The Vanguard Group. The Schedule 13G indicates that The Vanguard Group has sole voting power with respect to 575,215 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 17,398,018 shares.

60


BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP

Stock Ownership of Directors and Officers

The following table sets forth information, as of December 31, 2015, concerning:

the beneficial ownership of Agilent’s common stock by each director and each of the named executive officers included in the Summary Compensation Table herein; and

the beneficial ownership of Agilent’sJanuary 23, 2018, on the beneficial ownership of our common stock by (1) each director and each of our NEOs and (2) by all directors and executive officers as a group.

The number of shares beneficially owned by each entity, person, director or executive officer is determined under the rules of the SEC, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the individual has the sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares that the individual has the right to acquire as of February 29, 2016, 60 days after December 31, 2015,



Table of Contents

COMMON STOCK OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

through the exercise of any stock option or other right.  Unless otherwise indicated, each person has sole investment and voting power, or shares such powers with his or her spouse, with respect to the shares set forth in the following table.

Number ofTotal NumberNumber ofTotal Shares
Shares ofof SharesShares SubjectBeneficially
CommonDeferredBeneficiallyto ExercisableOwned Plus
   Name of Beneficial OwnerStockStock(1)Owned(2)Options(3)Underlying Units
   Henrik Ancher-Jensen           7,027             0          7,027          6,120            13,147       
   Paul N. Clark76485,37286,136086,136
   James G. Cullen29,969 (4)71,449101,41832,179133,597
   Mark Doak25,2591,58926,84837,59364,441
   Heidi Fields31,04251,40882,45032,179114,629
   Robert J. Herbold45,760 (5)045,76032,17977,939
   Didier Hirsch35,832 (6)92,914128,745323,670452,415
   Koh Boon Hwee47,52012,35559,87632,17992,055
   Patrick Kaltenbach20,463020,46329,75750,220
   Michael R. McMullen144,5880144,588490,199634,787
   Daniel K. Podolsky, M.D.03,5623,56203,562
   Sue H. Rataj2,29002,29002,290
   George A. Scangos, Ph.D.5,8807926,67206,672
   William P. Sullivan26,761220,571247,331662,385155,209
   Tadataka Yamada, M.D.12,48617,73030,216030,216
   All directors and executive officers491,706557,7421,049,4471,822,6212,878,188
          as a group (18) persons(7)

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

 

Total Number

 

Number of

 

Total Shares

 

 

 

Shares of

 

 

 

of Shares

 

Shares Subject

 

Beneficially

 

 

 

Common

 

Deferred

 

Beneficially

 

to Exercisable

 

Owned Plus

 

Name of Beneficial Owner

 

Stock

 

Stock (1)

 

Owned (2)

 

Options and RSUs(3)

 

Underlying Units

 

Hans E. Bishop

 

-

 

 

 

2,203

 

 

 

2,203

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,203

 

 

Paul N. Clark

 

764

 

 

 

87,113

 

 

 

87,877

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

87,877

 

 

James G. Cullen

 

8,235

(4)

 

 

72,905

 

 

 

81,140

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

81,140

 

 

Mark Doak

 

15,643

 

 

 

8,155

 

 

 

23,798

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

23,804

 

 

Robert J. Herbold

 

62,955

(5)

 

 

-

 

 

 

62,955

 

 

 

15,482

 

 

 

78,437

 

 

Didier Hirsch

 

24,706

(6)

 

 

94,808

 

 

 

119,514

 

 

 

197,784

 

 

 

317,298

 

 

Patrick Kaltenbach

 

6,213

 

 

 

21,658

 

 

 

27,871

 

 

 

8,875

 

 

 

36,746

 

 

Koh Boon Hwee

 

60,417

 

 

 

12,607

 

 

 

73,024

 

 

 

15,482

 

 

 

88,506

 

 

Heidi Kunz

 

9,612

(7)

 

 

52,456

 

 

 

62,068

 

 

 

15,482

 

 

 

77,550

 

 

Michael R. McMullen

 

130,971

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

130,971

 

 

 

364,680

 

 

 

495,651

 

 

Daniel K. Podolsky, M.D.

 

-

 

 

 

14,710

 

 

 

14,710

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

14,710

 

 

Sue H. Rataj

 

10,860

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

10,860

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

10,860

 

 

George A. Scangos, PhD

 

14,450

 

 

 

808

 

 

 

15,258

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

15,258

 

 

Jacob Thaysen

 

10,934

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

10,934

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

10,934

 

 

Tadataka Yamada, M.D.

 

12,486

 

 

 

31,495

 

 

 

43,981

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

43,981

 

 

All directors and executive officers as a group (19)

   persons (8)

 

422,093

 

 

 

418,337

 

 

 

840,430

 

 

 

757,838

 

 

 

1,598,268

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

___________________

(1)

Represents the number of deferred shares or share equivalents held by Fidelity Management Trust Company under the 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan and the Director Deferral Plan as to which voting or investment power exists.

(2)

Individual directors and executive officers as well as all directors and executive officers as a group beneficially own less than 1% of the 327,623,925 shares of Common Stock outstanding, as of December 31, 2015.January 23, 2018.

(3)

Represents the number of shares subject to options exercisable or restricted stock units subject to vesting, both within 60 days following January 23, 2018.

(3)

(4)

“Exercisable Options” means options that may be exercised as of February 19, 2016.
(4)

Includes 3,0002,849 shares held by Mr. Cullen’s Family Limited Partnership.Partnership and 1,520 shares held in an individual retirement account.

(5)

Includes 43,26060,455 shares held by Mr. Herbold’s Revocable Trust.Trust and 2,500 shares held in an individual retirement account.

(6)

Includes 100 shares held by Mr. Hirsch’s spouse.

(7)

All shares are held by Ms. Kunz in a living trust.

(7)

(8)

Includes 56,06573,266 direct and indirect shares, and 150,301140,047 options exercisable optionsor restricted stock units vesting both within 60 days following January 23, 2018, for a total of 206,366213,313 shares held by executive officers not separately listed in this table.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, requires Agilent’sour directors, executive officers and holders of more than 10% of Agilentour common stock to file reports with the SEC regarding their ownership and changes in ownership of Agilentour common stock.  Agilent believesWe believe that during the 20152017 fiscal year, itsour executive officers directors and holders of 10% or more of our common stockdirectors complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements.

In making these statements, Agilent haswe have relied upon examination of copies of Forms 3, 4 and 5 provided to Agilentus and the written representations of itsour directors and officers.

61




Table of Contents

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING


Q:

Who can attend the annual meeting?

A:

Stockholders of record as of January 23, 2018 (the “Record Date”), may attend and vote at the annual meeting.

Q:

Why did I receive a one-page notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?

A:

In accordance with rules and regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), instead of mailing a printed copy of our proxy materials to each stockholder of record, we are furnishing proxy materials, including this Proxy Statement and our 20152017 Annual Report to Stockholders, by providing access to such documents on the Internet. Stockholders will not receive printed copies of the proxy materials unless they request them. Instead, commencing on or about February 4, 2016,7, 2018, a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) was sent to most of our stockholders which will instruct you how to access and review the proxy materials on the Internet. The Notice also instructs you to submit your proxy via the Internet. If you would like to receive a paper or email copy of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions for requesting such materials in the Notice.

Q:

Why am I receiving these materials?

A:

Agilent’s Board is

We are providing these proxy materials to you on the Internet or, upon your request, hashave delivered printed versions of these materials to you by mail, in connection with Agilent’s 2016our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders, which will take place on March 16, 2016.21, 2018. Stockholders are invited to attend the annual meeting and are requested to vote on the proposals described in this Proxy Statement.

Q:

Who is soliciting my proxy?

A:

Agilent’s Board is

We are soliciting proxies to be used at the annual meeting of stockholders on March 16, 2016,21, 2018, for the purposes set forth in the foregoing Notice.

Q:

What is included in these materials?

A:

These materials include:

our Proxy Statement for our annual meeting; and

our 2017 Annual Report to Stockholders, which includes our audited consolidated financial statements.

If you requested printed versions of these materials by mail, these materials also include the proxy card for the annual meeting.

Q:

our Proxy Statement for Agilent’s annual meeting; and
our 2015 Annual Report to Stockholders, which includes our audited consolidated financial statements.
If you requested printed versions of these materials by mail, these materials also include the proxy card for the annual meeting.
Q:

What information is contained in these materials?

A:

The information included in this Proxy Statement relates to the proposals to be voted on at the annual meeting, the voting process, the compensation of directors and our most highly paid officers and certain other required information.

Q:

What shares owned by me can be voted?

A:

All shares owned by you as of the close of business on January 19, 2016 (the “Record Date”)23, 2018 may be voted. You may cast one vote per share of common stock that you held on the Record Date. These include shares that are: (1) held directly in your name as the stockholder of record, including shares received or purchased through the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan and 2009 Stock Plan and the Agilent Technologies, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and (2) held for you as the beneficial owner through a stockbroker, bank or other nominee or held for your account by the Deferred Compensation Plans. OnYou can direct Fidelity, the Record Date, Agilent had approximately 327,768,902trustee of the Deferred Compensation Plans, to vote your proportionate interest in the shares of common stock held under the Deferred Compensation Plans by returning a proxy card or voting instruction form or by providing voting instructions via the Internet or by telephone. Fidelity will vote your Deferred Compensation Plan shares as of the record date in the manner directed by you.  Because Fidelity is designated to vote on your behalf, you will not be able to vote your shares held in the Deferred Compensation Plans in person at the meeting. If we do not receive voting instructions from you by 1:00 a.m. Eastern time on March 19, 2018, Fidelity will not vote your Deferred Compensation Plan shares on any of the proposals brought at the annual meeting.

On the Record Date, we had 322,717,303 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.





Table of Contents

Q:

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING


Q:     What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?

A:

Most or our stockholders of Agilent hold their shares through a stockbroker, bank or other nominee rather than directly in their own name. As summarized below, there are some differences between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.

62

GENERAL INFORMATION

Stockholder of Record
If your shares are registered directly in your name with Computershare, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of record, and the Notice, or if requested, these proxy materials are being sent directly to you. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to the persons named as proxy holders, Michael R. McMullen, Agilent’s Chief Executive Officer and Michael Tang, Agilent’s Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, or to vote in person at the annual meeting. If you requested printed copies of the proxy materials, Agilent has enclosed a proxy card for you to use. You may also vote on the Internet or by telephone, as described below under the heading “How can I vote my shares without attending the annual meeting?”
Beneficial Owner

Stockholder of Record

If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent Computershare, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of record, and the Notice, or if requested, these proxy materials are being sent directly to you. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to the persons named as proxy holders, Michael R. McMullen, Chief Executive Officer and Michael Tang, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, or to vote in person at the annual meeting. If you requested printed copies of the proxy materials, we have enclosed a proxy card for you to use. You may also vote on the Internet or by telephone, as described below under the heading “How can I vote my shares without attending the annual meeting?”

Beneficial Owner

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name”, and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker or nominee who is considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of record. As the beneficial owner, you are invited to attend the annual meeting. You also have the right to direct your broker on how to vote these shares. Your broker or nominee should have enclosed a voting instruction card for you to direct your broker or nominee how to vote your shares. You may also vote by Internet or by telephone, as described below under “How can I vote my shares without attending the annual meeting?” However, shares held in “street name” may be voted in person by you only if you obtain a signed proxy from the record holder (stock brokerage, bank, or other nominee) giving you the right to vote the shares.

Q:

What identification is required for admission to the annual meeting?

A:

In order to be admitted to the annual meeting, you must present proof of ownership of our stock on the Record Date. This can be a brokerage statement or letter from a bank or broker indicating ownership on January 23, 2018, the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, a proxy card, or legal proxy or voting instruction card provided by your broker, bank or nominee. Any holder of a proxy from a stockholder must present the proxy card, properly executed, and a copy of the proof of ownership. Stockholders and proxyholders may also be asked to present a form of photo identification such as a driver’s license or passport.  Backpacks, cameras, cell phones with cameras, recording equipment and other electronic recording devices will not be permitted at the annual meeting. We reserve the right to inspect any persons or

attending

proposals prior to their admission to the annual meeting?” However, shares held in “street name” maymeeting. Failure to follow the meeting rules or permit inspection will be voted in person by you only if you obtain a signed proxygrounds for exclusion from the record holder (stock brokerage, bank, or other nominee) giving you the right to vote the shares.annual meeting.

Q:

How can I vote my shares in person at the annual meeting?

A:

Shares held directly in your name as the stockholder of record may be voted in person at the annual meeting. If you choose to vote your shares in person at the annual meeting, please bring proof of ownership of Agilentour stock on the record date, such as the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, legal proxy, voting instruction card provided by your broker, bank or nominee, or a proxy card as well as proof of identification. Even if you plan to attend the annual meeting, Agilent recommendswe recommend that you vote your shares in advance as described below so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the annual meeting.

Q:

How can I vote my shares without attending the annual meeting?

A:

Whether you hold your shares directly as the stockholder of record or beneficially in “street name”, you may direct your vote without attending the annual meeting by proxy. You can vote by proxy over the Internet or by telephone. Please follow the instructions provided in the Notice, or, if you request printed copies of proxy materials, on the proxy card or voting instruction card.

Q:

Can I revoke my proxy or change my vote?

A:

You may revoke your proxy or change your voting instructions prior to the vote at the annual meeting. You may enter a new vote by using the Internet or the telephone or by mailing a new proxy card or new voting instruction card bearing a later date (which will automatically revoke your earlier voting instructions) or by attending the annual meeting and voting in person. Your





Table of Contents

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING


attendance at the annual meeting in person will not cause your previously granted proxy to be revoked unless you specifically so request.

Q:

How are votes counted?

A:

In the election of directors, your vote may be cast “FOR” or “AGAINST” one or more of the nominees, or you may “ABSTAIN” from voting with respect to one or more of the nominees. Shares voting “ABSTAIN” have no effect on the election of directors.

63

GENERAL INFORMATION

For proposals 2, 3 and 4 your vote may be cast “FOR” or, “AGAINST” or you may “ABSTAIN.”  If you “ABSTAIN”, it has the same effect as a vote “AGAINST.” If you sign your proxy card or broker voting instruction card with no further instructions, your shares will be voted as described below in “Abstentions and Broker Non-VotesAbstentions and Broker Non-VotesAny shares represented by proxies that are marked to “ABSTAIN” from voting on a proposal will be counted as present in determining whether we have a quorum. They will also be counted in determining the total number of shares entitled to vote on a proposal. Abstentions and, if applicable, broker non-votes will not be counted as votes “FOR” or “AGAINST” a director nominee. Accordingly, abstentions are not counted for the purpose of determining the number of votes cast in the election of directors.If your shares are held in street name and you do not instruct your broker on how to vote your shares, your broker, in its discretion, may either leave your shares unvoted or vote your shares on routine matters. Only Proposal 2 (ratifying the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm) is considered a routine matter. In accordance with federal legislation adopted in 2010, the SEC has approved changes to NYSE Rule 452, the broker vote rule, that make executive compensation matters, including

say-on-pay, non- routine matters. If your broker returns a proxy card but does not vote your shares, this results in a “broker non-vote.” Broker non-votes will be counted as present for the purpose of determining a quorum.
Proposals 1 (election of directors) 3 (approval of the compensation of Agilent’s named executive officers), and 4 (approval of amendments to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to declassify the board) are not considered routine matters, and without your instruction, your broker cannot vote your shares. Because brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote on these proposals, broker non-votes will not be counted for the purpose of determining the number of votes cast on these proposals.
Q:     What is the voting requirement to approve each of the proposals?
A:Proposal 1, Election of Directors:
Under our majority voting standard, in uncontested elections of directors, such as this election, each director must be elected by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote. A “majority of the votes cast” means that the number of votes cast “FOR” a director must exceed 50% of the votes cast with respect to that director. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not count as a vote “for” or “against” a nominee’s election and thus will have no effect in determining whether a director nominee has received a majority of the votes cast.
Our board has adopted a policy under which, in uncontested elections, an incumbent director nominee who does not receive the required votes for re-election is expected to tender his or her resignation to our Board. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, or another duly appointed committee of the Board, will determine whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation generally within 90 days after certification of the election results. Agilent will publicly disclose the




Table of Contents

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING


committee’s determination regarding the tendered resignation and the rationale behind the decision in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC.

Proposal 2, Ratification of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm: The appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of a majority of shares present at the annual meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against“AGAINST.” If you sign your proxy card or broker voting instruction card with no further instructions, your shares will be voted as described below in “Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes.

Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes

Any shares represented by proxies that are marked to “ABSTAIN” from voting on a proposal will be counted as present in determining whether we have a quorum. They will also be counted in determining the total number of shares entitled to vote on a proposal. Abstentions and, if applicable, broker non-votes will not be counted as votes “FOR” or “AGAINST” a director nominee. Accordingly, abstentions are not counted for the purpose of determining the number of votes cast in the election of directors.

If your shares are held in street name and you do not instruct your broker on how to vote your shares, your broker, in its discretion, may either leave your shares unvoted or vote your shares on routine matters.  Only Proposal 2. The approval4 (ratifying the appointment of Proposal 2our independent registered public accounting firm) is considered a routine proposal on whichmatter.  If your broker returns a broker or other nominee is generally empowered toproxy card but does not vote your shares, this results in a “broker non-vote.” Broker non-votes will be counted as present for the absencepurpose of voting instructions from the beneficial owner, so broker non-votes are unlikely to result from this proposal.determining a quorum.

Proposal 3, ApprovalProposals 1 (election of directors), 2 (approval of the Compensationamendment and restatement of Agilent’s Named Executive Officers: The advisory vote regarding approvalour 2009 Stock Plan) and 3 (approval of the compensation of Agilent’sour named executive officers requires the affirmativeofficers) are not considered routine matters, and without your instruction, your broker cannot vote of a majority of shares present at the annual meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitledyour shares.  Because brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote on the proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as votes against this proposal.Brokerthese proposals, broker non-votes will have no effectnot be counted for the purpose of determining the number of votes cast on this proposal as brokers are not entitled to vote on such proposal in the absence of voting instructions from the beneficial owner.these proposals.

Proposal 4, Approval of amendments to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to declassify the Board: The vote regarding amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to declassify the board requires the affirmative vote of eighty percent (80%) of the outstanding voting stock. Abstentions will have the same effect as votes against this proposal.Broker non-votes will have no effect on this proposal as brokers are not entitled to vote on such proposal in the absence of voting instructions from the beneficial owner

Q:

What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice, proxy or voting instruction card?

A:

It means your shares are registered differently or are in more than one account. For each Notice you receive, please enter your vote on the Internetonline for each control number you have been assigned. If you receive paper copies of proxy materials, please provide voting instructions for all proxy and voting instruction cards you receive.

Q:

Where can I find the voting results of the annual meeting?

A:

Agilent

We will announce preliminary voting results at the annual meeting and publish preliminary, or final results if available, in a Current Report on Form 8-K within four business days of the annual meeting.

Q:

What happens if additional proposals are presented at the annual meeting?

A:

Other than the four proposals described in this Proxy Statement, Agilent doeswe do not expect any matters to be presented for a vote at the annual meeting. If you grant a proxy, the persons named as proxy holders, Michael R. McMullen, Agilent’s Chief Executive Officer, and Michael Tang, Agilent’s Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, will have the discretion to vote your shares on any additional matters properly presented for a vote at the annual meeting. If for any unforeseen reason, any one or more of Agilent’sour nominees is not available as a candidate for director, the persons named as proxy holders will vote your proxy for such other candidate or candidates as may be nominated by the BoardBoard.

Q:

What is the quorum requirement for the annual meeting?

A:

The quorum requirement for holding the annual meeting and transacting business is a majority of the outstanding shares





Table of Contents

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING


entitled to be voted. The shares may be present in person or represented by proxy at the annual meeting. Both abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum. Broker non-votes, however, are not counted as shares present and entitled to be voted with respect to the matter on which the broker has expressly not voted. Thus, broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of any of the matters being voted on at the annual meeting. Generally, broker non-votes occur when shares held by a broker for a beneficial owner are not voted with respect to a particular proposal because (1) the broker has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner and (2) the broker lacks discretionary voting power to vote such shares.

Q:

Who will count the vote?

A:

A representative of Computershare will tabulate the votes and act as the inspector of election.

Q:

Is my vote confidential?

A:

Proxy instructions, ballots and voting tabulations that identify individual stockholders are handled in a manner that protects your voting privacy. Your vote will not be disclosed either within Agilentthe company or to third parties except (1) as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements, (2) to allow for the tabulation of votes and certification of the vote and (3) to facilitate a successful proxy solicitation by the Board. Occasionally, stockholders provide written comments on their proxy card, which are then forwarded to Agilent’sour management.

64

Q:

GENERAL INFORMATION

Q:

Who will bear the cost of soliciting votes for the annual meeting?

A:

Agilent

We will pay the entire cost of preparing, assembling, printing, mailing and distributing these proxy materials. Agilent hasWe have retained the services of Georgeson Inc.LLC (“Georgeson”) to aid in the solicitation of proxies from banks, brokers, nominees and intermediaries. Agilent

estimatesWe estimate that itwe will pay Georgeson a fee of $13,000 for its services.  In addition to the mailing of these proxy materials, the solicitation of proxies or votes may be made in person, by telephone or by electronic communication by Agilent’s directors, officers and employees, who will not receive any additional compensation for such solicitation activities. In addition, Agilent may reimburse brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares for their expenses in forwarding solicitation material to such beneficial owners.

In addition to the mailing of these proxy materials, the solicitation of proxies or votes may be made in person, by telephone or by electronic communication by our directors, officers and employees, who will not receive any additional compensation for such solicitation activities.  In addition, we may reimburse brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares for their expenses in forwarding solicitation material to such beneficial owners.

Q:

May I propose actions for consideration at next year’s annual meeting of stockholders or nominate individuals to serve as directors?

A:

You may submit proposals for consideration at future annual stockholder meetings, including director nominations.

Stockholder Proposals:In order for a stockholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in Agilent’s proxy statement for next year’s annual meeting, the written proposal must be received by Agilent no later than October 7, 2016 and should contain such information as is required under Agilent’s Bylaws. Such proposals will need to comply with the SEC’s regulations regarding the inclusion of stockholder proposals in Agilent sponsored proxy materials. In order for a stockholder proposal to be raised from the floor during next year’s annual meeting, written notice must be received by Agilent no later than October 7, 2016 and should contain such information as required under Agilent’s Bylaws.
Nomination of Director Candidates:Agilent’s Bylaws permit stockholders to nominate directors at a stockholder meeting. In order to make a director nomination at an annual stockholder meeting, it is necessary that you notify Agilent not less than 120 days before the first anniversary of the date that the proxy statement for the preceding year’s annual meeting was first sent to stockholders.





Stockholder Proposals: TableIn order for a stockholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for next year’s annual meeting, the written proposal must be received by us no later than October 5, 2018 and should contain such information as is required under our Bylaws. Such proposals will need to comply with the SEC’s regulations regarding the inclusion of Contentsstockholder proposals in our proxy materials. In order for a stockholder proposal to be raised from the floor during next year’s annual meeting, written notice must be received by us no later than October 5, 2018 and should contain such information as required under our Bylaws.

Nomination of Director Candidates:  Our Bylaws permit stockholders to nominate directors at a stockholder meeting. In order to make a director nomination at an annual stockholder meeting, it is necessary that you notify us not less than 120 days before the first anniversary of the date that the proxy statement for the preceding year’s annual meeting was first sent to stockholders.

Our 2018 Proxy Statement was first sent to stockholders on February 7, 2018. Thus, in order for any such nomination notice to be timely for next year’s annual meeting, it must be received by us no later than October 5, 2018. In addition, the notice must meet all other requirements contained in our Bylaws and include any other information required pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act.

Copy of Bylaw Provisions: You may contact our Corporate Secretary at our corporate headquarters for a copy of the relevant Bylaw provisions regarding the requirements for making stockholder proposals and nominating director candidates. Additionally, a copy of our Bylaws can be accessed on the Agilent Investor Relations Web site under “Corporate Governance.”

Q:

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING


Agilent’s 2016 Proxy Statement was first sent to stockholders on February 4, 2016. Thus, in order for any such nomination notice to be timely for next year’s annual meeting, it must be received by Agilent not later than October 7, 2016. In addition, the notice must meet all other requirements contained in Agilent’s Bylaws and include any other information required pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act.
Copy of Bylaw Provisions:You may contact the Agilent Corporate Secretary at Agilent’s corporate headquarters for a copy of the relevant Bylaw provisions regarding the requirements for making stockholder proposals and nominating director candidates. Additionally, a copy of Agilent’s Bylaws can be accessed on the Agilent Investor Relations Web site at http://www.investor.agilent.com. Click “Corporate Governance” and then “Governance Policies” on the left hand side of the screen.
Q:How do I obtain a separate set of proxy materials if I share an address with other stockholders?

A:

To reduce expenses, in some cases, we are delivering one set of the proxy materials or, where applicable, one Notice to certain stockholders who share an address, unless otherwise requested by one or more of the stockholders. For stockholders receiving hard copies of the proxy materials, a separate proxy card is included with the proxy materials for each stockholder. For

stockholders receiving a Notice, the Notice will instruct you as to how you may access and review all of the proxy materials on the Internet. The Notice also instructs you as to how you may submit your proxy on the Internet. If you have only received one set of the proxy materials or one Notice, you may request separate copies at no additional cost to you by calling us at (408) 553-2424 or by writing to us at Agilent Technologies, Inc., 5301 Stevens Creek Blvd., Santa Clara, California 95051, Attn: Shareholder Records. If you received a Notice and you would like to receive a paper or email copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials in the Notice.
You may also request separate paper proxy materials or a separate Notice for future annual meetings by following the instructions for requesting such materials in the Notice, or by contacting us by calling or writing.at:

Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Attn:  Stockholder Records

5301 Stevens Creek Blvd.

Santa Clara, California 95051

(408) 553-2424

If you received a Notice and you would like to receive a paper or email copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials in the Notice.

You may also request separate paper proxy materials or a separate Notice for future annual meetings by following the instructions for requesting such materials in the Notice, or by contacting us by calling or writing.

Q:

If I share an address with other stockholders of Agilent,the company, how can we get only one set of voting materials for future meetings?

A:

You may request that we send you and the other stockholders who share an address with you only one Notice or one set of proxy materials by callingcontacting us at (408) 553-2424 or by writing to us at: Agilent Technologies, Inc., 5301 Stevens Creek Blvd., Santa Clara, California 95051, Attn: Shareholder Records.

Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Attn:  Stockholder Records

5301 Stevens Creek Blvd.

Santa Clara, California 95051

(408) 553-2424



65




Table of Contents

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING


Annual Report on Form 10-K

You may receive a copy of Agilent’sour Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 20152017 without charge by sending a written request to to:

Agilent Technologies, Inc.,

Attn: Investor Relations

5301 Stevens Creek Blvd., Boulevard

Santa Clara, California 95051 Attn: Investor Relations.

By Order of the Board,

Michael 
TMangICHAEL TANG

Senior Vice President, General Counsel

and Secretary

Dated: February 4,7, 2018


Appendix A

APPENDIX A TO PROXY STATEMENT

OF

AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

The reconciliation of non-GAAP net income and diluted EPS for the years ended October 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 follows:

NON-GAAP INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS AND DILUTED EPS RECONCILIATIONS

(In millions, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

October 31, 2017

 

 

October 31, 2016

 

 

October 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

Net

income

 

 

Diluted

EPS

 

 

Net

income

 

 

Diluted

EPS

 

 

Net

income

 

 

Diluted

EPS

 

 

 

GAAP net income

 

$

684

 

 

$

2.10

 

 

$

460

 

 

$

1.40

 

 

$

438

 

 

$

1.31

 

 

 

Non-GAAP adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset impairments

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

0.01

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

0.01

 

 

 

Acceleration of share-based compensation

   expense related to workforce reduction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

0.01

 

 

 

Intangible amortization

 

 

117

 

 

 

0.36

 

 

 

152

 

 

 

0.46

 

 

 

156

 

 

 

0.47

 

 

 

Business exit and divestiture costs

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

0.03

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

0.04

 

 

 

Transformational initiatives

 

 

12

 

 

 

0.04

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

0.12

 

 

 

56

 

 

 

0.17

 

 

 

Acquisition and integration costs

 

 

32

 

 

 

0.10

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

0.12

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

0.04

 

 

 

Pension settlement gain

 

 

(32

)

 

 

(0.10

)

 

 

(1

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension curtailment gain

 

 

 

 

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(0.05

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impairment of investment and loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

0.08

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

5

 

 

 

0.02

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

0.02

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

0.01

 

 

 

Adjustment for taxes (a)

 

 

(50

)

 

 

(0.16

)

 

 

(69

)

 

 

(0.21

)

 

 

(104

)

 

 

(0.32

)

 

 

Non-GAAP net income

 

$

768

 

 

$

2.36

 

 

$

651

 

 

$

1.98

 

 

$

583

 

 

$

1.74

 

 

(a)

The adjustment for taxes excludes tax benefits that management believes are not directly related to on-going operations and which are either isolated or cannot be expected to occur again with any regularity or predictability. For the years ended October 31, 2017, October 31, 2016 and October 2015, management used a non-GAAP effective tax rate of 18.0%, 19.0% and 20%, respectively.

Historical amounts are reclassified to conform with current presentation.

We provide non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP net income per share amounts in order to provide meaningful supplemental information regarding our operational performance and our prospects for the future. These supplemental measures exclude, among other things, charges related to amortization of intangibles, business exit and divestiture costs, transformational initiatives, acquisition and integration costs, pension settlement gain and impairment of investment and loans.

Asset impairments include assets that have been written-down to their fair value.

Business exit and divestiture costs include costs associated with the exit of the NMR business and other business divestitures.

Transformational initiatives include expenses associated with targeted cost reduction activities such as manufacturing transfers, site consolidations, legal entity and other business reorganizations, insourcing or outsourcing of activities. Such costs may include move and relocation costs, one-time termination benefits and other one-time reorganization costs. Included in this category are also expenses associated with the post-separation resizing of the IT infrastructure and streamlining of IT system as well as company programs to transform our product lifecycle management (PLM) system and financial systems.



TableAcquisition and Integration costs include all incremental expenses incurred to effect a business combination. Such acquisition costs may include advisory, legal, tax, accounting, valuation, and other professional or consulting fees. Such integration costs may include expenses directly related to integration of Contentsbusiness and facility operations, the transfer of assets and intellectual property, information technology systems and infrastructure and other employee-related costs.

Pension settlement gain resulted from transfer of the substitutional portion of our Japanese pension plan to the government.

Pension curtailment gain resulted from transfer of the substitutional portion of our Japanese pension plan to the government.

Impairment of investment and loans include investments and their related convertible loans that have been written down to their fair value.

Other includes certain legal costs and settlements in addition to other miscellaneous adjustments.

Our management uses non-GAAP measures to evaluate the performance of our core businesses, to estimate future core performance and to compensate employees. Since management finds this measure to be useful, we believe that our investors benefit from seeing our results “through the eyes” of management in addition to seeing our GAAP results. This information facilitates our management’s internal comparisons to our historical operating results as well as to the operating results of our competitors.

Our management recognizes that items such as amortization of intangibles can have a material impact on our cash flows and/or our net income. Our GAAP financial statements including our statement of cash flows portray those effects. Although we believe it is useful for investors to see core performance free of special items, investors should understand that the excluded items are actual expenses that may impact the cash available to us for other uses. To gain a complete picture of all effects on the company’s profit and loss from any and all events, management does (and investors should) rely upon the GAAP income statement. The non-GAAP numbers focus instead upon the core business of the company, which is only a subset, albeit a critical one, of the company’s performance.

Readers are reminded that non-GAAP numbers are merely a supplement to, and not a replacement for, GAAP financial measures. They should be read in conjunction with the GAAP financial measures. It should be noted as well that our non-GAAP information may be different from the non-GAAP information provided by other companies.


The reconciliation of adjusted non-GAAP income from operations and operating margins for the year ended October 31, 2017 follows:

RECONCILIATION OF ADJUSTED NON-GAAP INCOME FROM OPERATIONS AND OPERATING MARGINS

(In millions, except margin data)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating

 

 

 

 

 

FY17

 

 

Margin %

 

 

 

Revenue:

 

$

4,472

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GAAP Income from operations

 

$

841

 

 

 

18.8

%

 

 

Add:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible amortization

 

 

117

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transformational initiatives

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition and integration costs

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension settlement gain

 

 

(32

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-GAAP income from operations

 

$

974

 

 

 

21.8

%

 

 

Reimbursement from Keysight for services (a)

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted non-GAAP income from operations

 

$

986

 

 

 

22.0

%

 

(a)

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETINGPost separation, Agilent is providing Keysight Technologies, Inc. certain site services. These site services are included in our operating expenses.  The amounts billed to Keysight for these services are recorded in other income.


We provide non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP net income per share amounts in order to provide meaningful supplemental information regarding our operational performance and our prospects for the future. These supplemental measures exclude, among other things, charges related to amortization of intangibles, transformational initiatives, acquisition and integration costs, and pension settlement gain.

Our management recognizes that items such as amortization of intangibles can have a material impact on our cash flows and/or our net income. Our GAAP financial statements including our statement of cash flows portray those effects. Although we believe it is useful for investors to see core performance free of special items, investors should understand that the excluded items are actual expenses that may impact the cash available to us for other uses. To gain a complete picture of all effects on the company’s profit and loss from any and all events, management does (and investors should) rely upon the GAAP income statement. The non-GAAP numbers focus instead upon the core business of the company, which is only a subset, albeit a critical one, of the company’s performance.

Readers are reminded that non-GAAP numbers are merely a supplement to, and not a replacement for, GAAP financial measures.  They should be read in conjunction with the GAAP financial measures.  It should be noted as well that our non-GAAP information may be different from the non-GAAP information provided by other companies.


DIRECTIONS TO AGILENT’S HEADQUARTERSAppendix B

(Marked to Show Changes)

AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

2009From2018 STOCK PLAN

(formerly the South (San Jose)“2009 Stock Plan”)

Take Highway 280 North towards San Francisco. Take1.Purpose and Background of the Stevens Creek/Lawrence Expressway exitPlan.  The purpose of this 2018 Stock Plan (formerly known as the 2009 Stock Plan, as amended and turn left onto Stevens Creek Blvd.restated) (the “Plan”) is to encourage ownership in the Company by key personnel whose long-term employment is considered essential to the Company’s continued progress and, thereby, encourage recipients to act in the stockholder’s interest and share in the Company’s success.  The Plan is intended to permit the grant of Awards that qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code.  ThePrior to the Effective Date (as hereinafter defined), the Plan was formerly known as the 2009 Stock Plan wasas adopted by the Board on November 19, 2008 (the “Adoption Date”) and shall become effective upon its approval by the stockholders of the Company (the “2008.  All references to the 2009 Stock Plan contained in any (i) future award agreements, other grant materials or correspondence to participants or (ii) other Company plans, after the Effective Date”), shall also be deemed to refer to this Plan.

2.Definitions.  As used herein, the following definitions shall apply:

(a)Administrator” means the Board or any of its Committees as shall be administering the Plan, in accordance with Section 4 of the Plan.

(b)Affiliate” means any entity that is directly or indirectly controlled by the Company or any entity in which the Company has a significant ownership interest as determined by the Administrator.

(c)Applicable Laws” means the requirements relating to the administration of stock option plans under U.S. federal and state laws, any stock exchange or quotation system on which the Common Stock is listed or quoted and the applicable securities laws of any foreign jurisdiction where Awards are, or will be, granted under the Plan.

(d)Award” means a Cash Award, dividend equivalent, SAR, Stock Award, or Option granted in accordance with the terms of the Plan.

(e)Award Agreement” means a written or electronic agreement between the Company and an Awardee evidencing the terms and conditions of an individual Award.  The Award Agreement is subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.

(f)Awardee” means the holder of an outstanding Award.

(g)Awardee Eligible to Vest” means the holder of an outstanding Award who is providing Service.

(h)Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

(i)Cash Awards” means cash awards granted pursuant to Section 13 of the Plan.

(j)Code” means the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

(k)Committee” means a committee of Directors appointed by the Board in accordance with Section 4 of the Plan.

(l)Common Stock” means the common stock of the Company.

(m)Company” means Agilent Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

(n)Consultant” means any person, including an advisor, engaged by the Company, a Subsidiary or Affiliate to render services to such entity as an independent contractor but who is neither an Employee nor a Director.


(o)Deferred Share” shall mean the grant of a Stock Award to a Non-Employee Director consisting of a contractual right to receive a Share in the future after attainment of the vesting criteria established by the Committee in accordance with Section 15 of the Plan and the Award Agreement.

(p)Director” means a member of the Board.

(q)Employee” means a full time or part time employee of the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate, including Officers and Directors, who is treated as an employee in the personnel records of the Company or its Subsidiary or Affiliate for approximately 0.1 milesthe relevant period, but shall exclude individuals who are classified as (i) leased from or otherwise employed by a third party, (ii) independent contractors, or (iii) intermittent or temporary, even if any such classification is changed retroactively as a result of an audit, litigation or otherwise.  An Awardee shall not cease to be an Employee in the case of (A) any leave of absence approved by the Company or its Subsidiary or Affiliate, or (B) transfers between locations of the Company or between the Company and/or any Subsidiary or Affiliate. Neither Service as a Director nor payment of a director’s fee by the Company shall be sufficient to constitute “employment” by the Company.

(r)Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

(s)Fair Market Value” means, as of any date, the quoted closing sales price for such Common Stock as of such date (or if no sales were reported on such date, the closing price on the last preceding day a sale was made) as quoted on the stock exchange or a national market system, with the highest trading volume, as reported in such source as the Administrator shall determine consistent with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

(t)Grant Date” means the date selected by the Administrator, from time to time, upon which Awards are granted to Participants pursuant to this Plan.

(u)Incentive Stock Option” means an Option intended to qualify as an incentive stock option within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

(v)Non-Employee Director” means a Director who is not an Employee.

(w)Nonstatutory Stock Option” means an Option not intended to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option.

(x)NYSE” means the New York Stock Exchange.

(y)Officer” means a person who is an officer of the Company within the meaning of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

(z)Option” means a conditional opportunity granted pursuant to the Plan to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at some point in the future at a price that is fixed on the date of grant. Options granted under the Plan may be Incentive Stock Options or Nonstatutory Stock Options.

(aa)Participant” means an Employee, Director (including a Non-Employee Director) or Consultant.

(bb)Performance Award” means a Stock Award or Cash Award granted pursuant to Section 14.

(cc)Performance Criteria” means the following: (i) sales revenue; (ii) gross margin; (iii) operating marginincome; (iv) operatingearnings or income; (v) pre-tax profit; (vi) measures (including earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization; (g) net income; (h); (v) pre-tax profit; (vi) expenses; (vii) the marketshare price of the sharesperformance; (viii) earnings per share; (ix) return on stockholdermeasures (including return on assets, capital, invested capital, equity, sales or revenue); (x) return on capital; (xi) return on net assets; (xii) economic value added; (xi) market share; (xii) safety; (xiii) market share; (xiv) customer service; (xv) customer satisfaction; (xvi) safety; (xvii) total stockholder return; (xviii)xiv) cash flow (including free cash flow); (xixxv) size-adjusted growth in earnings; and (xx(xvi) net order dollars; (xvii) contract bookings; (xviii) contract awards; (xix) book to bill; (xx) backlog; (xxi) customer metrics (including service, satisfaction, retention or profitability); (xxii) productivity; (xxiii) expense targets; (xxiv) market share; (xxv) cost control measures; (xxvi) balance sheet metrics; (xxvii) strategic initiatives; (xxviii) implementation, completion or attainment of measurable objectives with respect to recruitment or retention of personnel or employee satisfaction; (xxix) successful completion of, or achievement of milestones or objectives related to financing or capital raising transactions, strategic acquisitions or divestitures, joint ventures, partnerships, collaborations or other transactions; (xxx) debt levels or debt ratios; (xxxi) operating efficiency; (xxxii) working capital targets, including days working capital; (xxxiii)


quantifiable, objective measures of individual performance relevant to the particular individual’s job responsibilities; (xxxiv) any combination or the foregoing business criteria; and (xxxv) such other criteria as determined by the Committee, each with respect to the Company and/or any operating unit(s), one or more operating units, divisions, subsidiaries or business segments of the Company and/or one or more product lines or products of the Company, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.; provided, however, that such criteria shall include any derivations of criteria listed above (e.g., income shall include pre-tax income, net income, or operating income).  Any criteria that are financial metrics may be determined in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) or may be adjusted when established (or to the extent permitted under Section 162(m), at any time thereafter) to include or exclude any items otherwise includable or excludable under GAAP.  Further, any Performance Criteria may be applied on an absolute or relative basis.  

(dd)Performance Share” means a Share acquired pursuant to a grant of a Stock Award that is subject to vesting based upon the attainment of one or more Performance Criteria.  

(ee)Performance Unit” means the grant of a Stock Award consisting of a contractual right to receive a Share based in whole or in part, upon the attainment of one or more Performance Criteria.

(ff)Plan” means this 20092018 Stock Plan effective as of the date of its approval by the stockholders of the Company pursuant to Section 24.

(gg)Restricted Stock” means a Share acquired pursuant to a grant of a Stock Award under Section 12 of the Plan that is subject to certain restrictions as set forth in Section 12 and in the Award Agreement.

(hh)Restricted Stock Unit” means the grant of a Stock Award consisting of a contractual right to receive a Share (or the cash equivalent of a Share) in the future after attainment of vesting criteria established by the Committee in accordance with Section 12 of the Plan and the Award Agreement.

(ii)Service” means service as an Employee, Director, Non-Employee Director or Consultant.  A Participant’s Service does not terminate when continued service crediting is required by applicable law.  However, for purposes of determining whether an Option is entitled to continuing Incentive Stock Option status, a common-law employee’s Service will be treated as terminating ninety (90) days after such Employee went on leave, unless such Employee’s right to return to active work is guaranteed by law or by a contract.  Service terminates in any event when the approved leave ends, unless such Employee’s right to return to active work is guaranteed by law or by a contract.  Service terminates in any event when the approved leave ends, unless such Employee immediately returns to active work.  The Committee determines whichwhen leaves count toward Service, and when Service terminates for all purposes under the Plan.  Further, unless otherwise determined by the Committee, a Participant’s Service shall not be deemed to have terminated merely because of a change in the capacity in which the Participant provides service to the Company, a Subsidiary or an Affiliate, or a transfer between entities (the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate); provided there is no interruption or other termination of Service.

(jj)Share” means a share of the Common Stock, as adjusted in accordance with Section 1518 of the Plan.

(kk)SAR” means a stock appreciation right granted pursuant to Section 11 of the Plan.

(ll)Stock Award” means a right to purchase or receive Common Stock pursuant to an Award described in Section 12.

(mm)Subsidiary” means a “subsidiary corporation”, whether now or hereafter existing, as defined in Section 424(f) of the Code.

3.Stock Subject to the Plan.  Subject to the provisions of Section 18 of the Plan, the maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be issued under the Plan is 25,000,000 Shares.  The Shares may be authorized, but unissued, or reacquired Common Stock.  In addition, if an award previously granted under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan or the 2009 Stock Plan is forfeited, expires or becomes unexercisable without having been exercised in full, the Shares which were subject to such award shall again be available to be the subject of an Award under the Plan.  

For purposes of the total number of Shares available for grant under this Plan, any Shares that are subject to Awards of Options or Stock Appreciation Rights shall be counted against the limit stated in this Section 3 as one (1) Share issued, and any shares issued in connection with Stock Awards shall be counted against the limit stated in this Section 3 as two (2.0) Shares for


every one (1) Share issued.  Further, if a SAR or a Restricted Stock Unit is settled in cash on a net basis, then turn rightonly the equivalent number of Shares which would have actually been distributed to the Participant shall be taken into Agilent’s parking lotaccount for purposes of reducing the number of Shares available for grant under the Plan.

If an Award is forfeited, expires or becomes unexercisable without having been exercised in full, the Shares which expire or are forfeited, shall become available for future grant or sale under the Plan (unless the Plan has terminated) based on the same ratio as the Shares were treated in the preceding paragraph.  The following Shares may not again be made available for issuance as Awards under the Plan: (a) Shares not issued or delivered as a result of the net settlement of an outstanding Award (with the exception of cash settled SARs and Restricted Stock Units described in the second paragraph of this Section 3), (b) Shares used to pay the exercise price or withholding taxes related to an outstanding Award, or (c) Shares repurchased on the open market with the proceeds of the option exercise price.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Shares issued pursuant to a Stock Award are repurchased by the Company at their original purchase price, such Shares shall become available for future grant under the Plan.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, Shares issued pursuant to awards (including, but not limited to Conversion Options described in Section 4(c)(x)) assumed or issued in substitution of other awards in connection with the acquisition by the Company or a Subsidiary of an unrelated entity shall not reduce the maximum number of Shares issuable under this Section 3.  In addition., to the extent the Company assumes ShareShares originally reserved for issuance from a plan that was previously maintained by an acquired company, those Shares shall be available for Award under this Plan and shall not reduce the maximum number of Shares issuable under this Section 3; provided, however, that this sentence shall not apply to any plan which was not previously approved by the stockholders of the acquired company.

4.Administration of the Plan.

(a)The Board or a Committee appointed by the Board shall be the Administrator.  To the extent the Board acts as the Administrator, references herein to “Committee” shall include the Board.

(b)Procedure.

(i)Multiple Administrative Bodies.  The Plan may be administered by different Committees with respect to different groups of Participants.

(ii)Section 162(m).  To the extent that the Administrator determines it to be desirable to qualify Awards granted hereunder as “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, the Plan shall be administered with respect to “covered employees” as defined by Section 162(m) of the Code by a Committee of two or more “outside directors.”

(iii)Rule 16b-3.  To the extent desirable to qualify transactions hereunder as exempt under Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act (“Rule 16b-3”), the transactions contemplated hereunder shall be structured to satisfy the requirements for exemption under Rule 16b-3.

(iv)Independent Directors.  To the extent necessary to satisfy the rules of the applicable U. S. national securities exchange that is the principal trading market for the Common Stock, the members of the Committee shall qualify as “independent directors.”

(v)Other Administration.  Subject to applicable law and the rules of the U.S. national securities exchange that is the principal trading market for the Common Stock, the Board may delegate to the Executive Committee of the Board (the “Executive Committee”) or other officer(s) of the Company the power to approve Awards to Participants who are not (A) subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act or (B) at the second stop light.time of such approval, “covered employees” under Section 162(m) of the Code.

(c)FromPowers of the North (San Francisco)Administrator

Take Highway 280 South towards San Jose. Take the Stevens Creek Blvd/Lawrence Expressway exit. Turn left on Stevens Creek Blvd. for approximately 0.2 miles and turn left into Agilent’s parking lot at the first stop light.

Parking

Parking will be designated as you enter the parking lot.



©

Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2016
Printed in U.S.A. February, 2016

Printed on recycled paper with 30% post-consumer waste

Admission.  Subject to the annual meeting willprovisions of the Plan, and in the case of a Committee, subject to the specific duties delegated by the Board to such Committee, the Administrator shall have the authority, in its discretion:

(i)to select the Participants to whom Awards may be granted hereunder;

(ii)to determine the number of shares of Common Stock to be covered by each Award granted hereunder;


(iii)to approve forms of agreement for use under the Plan;

(iv)to determine the terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, of any Award granted hereunder.  Such terms and conditions include, but are not limited to, stockholders. You are entitledthe exercise price, the time or times when an Award may be exercised (which may or may not be based on performance criteria), any vesting acceleration or waiver of forfeiture restrictions, and any restriction or limitation regarding any Award or the Shares relating thereto, based in each case on such factors as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, shall determine; to attendconstrue and interpret the annual meeting only if you areterms of the Plan and Awards granted pursuant to the Plan;

(v)to adopt rules and procedures relating to the operation and administration of the Plan to accommodate the specific requirements of local laws and procedures.  Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Administrator is specifically authorized (A) to adopt the rules and procedures regarding the conversion of local currency, withholding procedures and handling of stock certificates which vary with local requirements, (B) to adopt sub-plans and Plan addenda as the Administrator deems desirable, to accommodate foreign tax laws, regulations and practice;

(vi)to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Plan, including rules and regulations relating to sub-plans and Plan addenda;

(vii)to make all determinations whether an individual is an Awardee Eligible to Vest and when such eligibility ceases;

(viii)to modify or amend each Award, provided, however, that any such amendment is subject to Section 19(c) of the Plan and may not impair any outstanding Award unless agreed to in writing by the Awardee;

(ix)to allow Awardees to satisfy withholding tax obligations by electing to have the Company withhold from the Shares to be issued upon exercise of an Award that number of Shares having a stockholdervalue (as determined solely by the Plan Administrator or its delegate(s)) equal to the minimum amount required to be withheld.  The value of recordthe Shares to be withheld shall be determined solely by the Plan Administrator or its delegate(s) on the date that the amount of tax to be withheld is to be determined.  All elections by an Awardee to have Shares withheld for this purpose shall be made in such form and under such conditions as the Administrator may deem necessary or advisable;

(x)to authorize conversion or substitution under the Plan of any or all outstanding stock options held by Awardees of an entity acquired by the Company (the “Conversion Options”).  Any conversion or substitution shall be effective as of the close of the merger or acquisition. The Conversion Options may be Nonstatutory Stock Options or Incentive Stock Options, as determined by the Administrator.  Unless otherwise determined by the Administrator at the time of conversion or substitution, all Conversion Options shall have the same terms and conditions as Options generally granted by the Company under the Plan;

(xi)to authorize any person to execute on behalf of the Company any instrument required to effect the grant of an Award previously granted by the Administrator;

(xii)to delegate day-to-day administration and operation of the Plan and the authority to make administrative decisions and adopt rules and procedures relating to the operation and administration of the Plan to an officer of the Company and his or her delegates;

(xiii)to make all other determinations deemed necessary or advisable for administering the Plan and any Award granted hereunder; and

(xiv)to specify in an Award Agreement at the time of the Award, or later pursuant to an amendment of an outstanding Award, that the Participant’s rights, payments and benefits with respect to an Award (including amounts received upon the settlement or exercise of an Award) shall be subject to reduction, cancellation, forfeiture or clawback upon the occurrence of certain specified events, in addition to any otherwise applicable vesting or performance conditions of an Award.  Such events may include, but shall not be limited to, violation of material Company policies, breach of noncompetition, confidentiality or other restrictive covenants that may apply to the Participant or other conduct by the Participant that is detrimental to the business or reputation of the Company or its Affiliates.

(d)Effect of Administrator’s Decision. The Administrator’s decisions, determinations and interpretations shall be final and binding on Januaryall Awardees.


5.Eligibility. Awards may be granted to Participants, provided, however, that Incentive Stock Options may be granted only to Employees of the Company or a Subsidiary.

6.Limitations.

(a)Each Option shall be designated in the Award Agreement as either an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonstatutory Stock Option.  However, notwithstanding such designation, to the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value of the Shares with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by the Awardee during any calendar year (under all plans of the Company and any Subsidiary) exceeds $100,000, such Options shall be treated as Nonstatutory Stock Options.  For purposes of this Section 6(a), Incentive Stock Options shall be taken into account in the order in which they were granted.  The Fair Market Value of the Shares shall be determined as of the time the Option with respect to such Shares is granted.

(b)For purposes of Incentive Stock Options, no leave of absence may exceed ninety (90) days, unless reemployment upon expiration of such leave is guaranteed by statute or contract.  If reemployment upon expiration of a leave of absence approved by the Company is not so guaranteed, on the 91st day of such leave an Awardee’s employment with the Company shall be deemed terminated for Incentive Stock Option purposes and any Incentive Stock Option held by the Awardee shall cease to be treated as an Incentive Stock Option and shall be treated for tax purposes as a Nonstatutory Stock Option three (3) months thereafter.

(c)No Participant shall have any claim or right to be granted an Award and the grant of any Award shall not be construed as giving a Participant the right to continue in the employ of or service to the Company, its Subsidiaries or Affiliates.  Further, the Company, its Subsidiaries and Affiliates expressly reserve the right, at any time, to dismiss a Participant at any time without liability or any claim under the Plan, except as provided herein or in any Award Agreement entered into hereunder.

(d)The following limitations shall apply to grants of Awards under this Plan:

(i)No Participant shall be granted, in any fiscal year of the Company, Options to purchase or SARs for more than 1,500,000 Shares.  No Participant shall be granted in any fiscal year of the Company, Stock Awards for more than 1,000,000 Shares.

(ii)In connection with his or her initial service, a Participant may be granted Options to purchase or SARs for up to an additional 1,000,000 Shares that shall not count against the limit set forth in subsection (i) above.

(iii)Notwithstanding the provisions of (i) above, an additional 1,000,000 Shares may be granted to a Participant as “New Executive Stock Awards.”  New Executive Grants are performance based Stock Awards that are granted to newly hired executives of the Company.  

(iv)The maximum number of Options which may be granted as Incentive Stock Options under the Plan is 25,000,000 shares.

(v)The maximum amount payable to a Participant pursuant to a Cash Award for each fiscal year of the Company shall be $10,000,000.

(vi)The limitations in Sections 6(d)(i)-(iv) shall be adjusted proportionately in connection with any change in the Company’s capitalization as described in Section 18.

(vii)If an Option or SAR is cancelled in the same fiscal year of the Company in which it was granted (other than in connection with a transaction described in Section 18 the cancelled Option or SAR will be counted against the limits set forth in subsections (i), (ii) and (iii) above.

(viii)Other then in connection with a change in the Company’s capitalization (as described in Section 18(a)) or a Change of Control as described in Section 18(c)), Options and SARs may not be repriced, replaced, regranted through cancellation or modification without stockholder approval if the effect of such repricing, replacement, regrant or modification would be to reduce the exercise price of such Option or SAR.  In addition, without stockholder approval, Options and SARs having exercise prices per share greater than the Fair Market Value of a Share may not be substituted for or replaced by any other Stock Award or be cancelled in exchange for cash.  Nothing in this Section 6(d)(viii) shall be construed to apply to the issuance or assumption of an Option or SAR in connection with the acquisition by the Company or a subsidiary of an unrelated entity provided such actions are taken in a manner that complies with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.


7.Term of Plan.  Subject to Section 24 of the Plan, the Plan shall become effective on its Effective Date.  It shall continue in effect for a term of ten (10) years unless terminated earlier under Section 19 2016,of the Plan.

8.Term of Award.  The term of each Award shall be determined by the Administrator and stated in the Award Agreement.  In the case of an Option or SAR, the maximum term shall be ten (10) years from the Grant Date or such shorter term as may be provided in the Award Agreement except to the extent necessary or desireable to comply with any foreign law.

9.Option Exercise Price and Consideration.

(a)Exercise Price.  The per share exercise price for the Shares to be issued pursuant to the exercise of an Option shall be determined by the Administrator and shall be no less than 100% of the Fair Market Value per Share on the Grant Date.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the per share exercise price for Shares to be issued pursuant to an Option which is assumed or substituted for in connection with the acquisition by the Company or a Subsidiary of an unrelated entity may be less than the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of the assumption or substitution provided the exercise price is determined in a manner that complies with the requirements of Sections 409A and 424 of the Code, as applicable.

(b)Vesting Period and Exercise Dates.  At the time an Option is granted, the Administrator shall fix the period within which the Option may be exercised and shall determine any conditions that must be satisfied before the Option may be exercised.

(c)Form of Consideration.  The Administrator shall determine the acceptable form of consideration for exercising an Option, including the method of payment.  In the case of an Incentive Stock Option, the Administrator shall determine the acceptable form of consideration at the Grant Date.  Acceptable forms of consideration may include:

(i)cash;

(ii)check or wire transfer (denominated in U.S. Dollars);

(iii)other Shares which (A) in the case of Shares acquired upon exercise of an Option, have been owned by the Awardee for more than six months on the date of surrender, and (B) have a value (as determined solely by the Plan Administrator or its delegate(s) based upon the NYSE closing price of the underlying shares on the trading day prior to the date of exercise) on the date of surrender equal to the aggregate exercise price of the Shares as to which said Option shall be exercised;

(iv)consideration received by the Company under a cashless exercise program implemented by the Company in connection with the Plan;

(v)any combination of the foregoing methods of payment; or

(vi)such other consideration and method of payment for the issuance of Shares to the extent permitted by Applicable Laws.  

10.Exercise of Option.

(a)Procedure for Exercise; Rights as a Stockholder.  Any Option granted hereunder shall be exercisable according to the terms of the Plan and at such times and under such conditions as determined by the Administrator and set forth in the respective Award Agreement.  An Option shall continue to vest during any authorized leave of absence and such Option may be exercised to the extent vested during such leave, unless otherwise terminated in accordance with its terms. An Option may not be exercised for a fraction of a Share.

An Option shall be deemed exercised when the Company or its duly authorized agent receives: (i) an executed exercise agreement, where required by the Plan Administrator or its delegate(s), (ii) full payment for the Shares with respect to which the related Option is exercised, and (iii) with respect to Nonstatutory Stock Options, payment of all applicable withholding taxes due upon such exercise.

Shares issued upon exercise of an Option shall be issued in the name of the Awardee or, if requested by the Awardee, in the name of the Awardee and his or her spouse.  Until the Shares are issued (as evidenced by the appropriate entry on the books of the Company or of a duly authorized transfer agent of the Company), no right to vote or receive dividends or any other rights as a stockholder shall exist with respect to the Shares subject to an Option, notwithstanding the exercise of the Option.  The Company shall issue (or cause to be issued) such Shares promptly after the Option is exercised.  No adjustment will be made for a


dividend or other right for which the record date or hold a valid proxyis prior to the date the Shares are issued, except as provided in Section 16 of the Plan.

(b)Cessation of Eligibility to Vest.  Unless otherwise provided for by the meeting. In orderAdministrator in the Award Agreement, if an individual ceases to be admittedan Awardee Eligible to Vest, such Awardee’s unvested Option shall terminate immediately.  On the date such individual ceases to be an Awardee Eligible to Vest, the Shares covered by the unvested portion of his or her Option shall revert to the annual meeting, you must present proofPlan.

11.SARs.

(a)General.  The Administrator may grant SARs to Participants subject to the terms and conditions not inconsistent with the Plan and determined by the Administrator.  The terms and conditions shall be provided for in the Award Agreement which may be delivered in writing or electronically. SARs shall be exercisable, in whole or in part, at such times as the Administrator shall specify in the Award Agreement.

(b)Exercise.  Upon the exercise of ownershipa SAR, in whole or in part, an Awardee shall be entitled to a payment in an amount equal to the difference between the value (as determined solely by the Plan Administrator or its delegate(s) based upon the NYSE closing price of Agilent stockthe underlying shares on the record date. This can be a brokerage statement or letter from a bank or broker indicating ownership on January 19, 2016,trading day prior to the Noticedate of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, a proxy card, or legal proxy or voting instruction card provided by your broker, bank or nominee. Any holderexercise) of a proxy from a stockholder must presentfixed number of shares of Common Stock covered by the proxy card, properly executed, and a copyexercised portion of the proofSAR on the date of ownership. Stockholders and proxyholderssuch exercise, over the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock covered by the exercised portion of the SAR on the Grant Date; provided, however, that the Administrator may alsoplace limits on the aggregate amount that may be askedpaid upon the exercise of a SAR.  The Company’s obligation arising upon the exercise of a SAR will be paid in cash or Shares of Common Stock (or a combination thereof), as determined by the applicable Award Agreement.

(c)Method of Exercise.  A SAR shall be deemed to present a formbe exercised when written or electronic notice of photo identification such as a driver’s license or passport. Backpacks, cameras, cell phones with cameras, recording equipment and other electronic recording devices will not be permitted at the annual meeting. Agilent reserves the right to inspect any persons or items prior to their admissionexercise has been given to the annual meeting. Failure to followCompany or its duly authorized agent in accordance with the meeting rules or permit inspection will be grounds for exclusion from the annual meeting.



Table of Contents

ANNEXES


Annex A

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Additions are underlined, deletions are struck-out)

Article VIIterms of the AmendedSAR by the person entitled to exercise the SAR.  The SAR shall cease to be exercisable to the extent it has been exercised.

(d)Cessation of Eligibility to Vest. Unless otherwise provided for by the Administrator in the Award Agreement, if an Awardee ceases to be an Awardee Eligible to Vest, the Awardee’s unvested SAR, shall terminate immediately upon the date such individual ceases to be an Awardee Eligible to Vest.

12.Stock Awards.

(a)General.  The Administrator may grant Stock Awards including, but not limited to Deferred Shares, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares and Restated CertificatePerformance Units to Participants.  Such Stock Awards may be issued either alone, in addition to, or in tandem with other Awards granted under the Plan.  After the Administrator determines that it will offer a Stock Award under the Plan, it shall advise the Awardee in writing or electronically, by means of Incorporationan Award Agreement, of the terms, conditions and restrictions related to the offer, including the number of Shares that the Awardee shall be amendedentitled to receive or purchase, the price to be paid, if any, and, restatedif applicable, the time within which the Awardee must accept such offer.  The offer shall be accepted by execution of an Award Agreement in the form determined by the Administrator. The Administrator will require that all Shares subject to read as follows:a right of repurchase or forfeiture be held in escrow until such repurchase right or risk of forfeiture lapses.  

ARTICLE VII

For the management(b)The grant or vesting of the business and for the conduct of affairs of the Corporation, and in further definition, limitation and regulation of powers of the Corporation, of its directors and of its stockholder or any class thereof, as the casea Stock Award may be it is further provided that:

A. The managementmade contingent on achievement of the business and the conduct of the affairs of the Corporation shall be vested in its Board of Directors. The number of directors of this Corporation shall be fixedperformance conditions and may be changeddesignated as a Performance Award subject to Section 14.

(c)Forfeiture.  Unless otherwise provided for by the Administrator in the Award Agreement determines otherwise, any unvested Stock Award shall be forfeited immediately after the date upon which an individual ceases to be an Awardee Eligible to Vest.  To the extent that the Awardee purchased the Stock Award, the Company shall have a right to repurchase the unvested Stock Award at the original price paid by the Awardee upon the Awardee ceasing to be a Participant for any reason.

(d)Rights as a Stockholder.  Unless otherwise provided for by the Administrator, once a Stock Award which is Restricted Stock or Performance Stock is accepted, the Awardee shall have the rights equivalent to those of a stockholder, and shall be a stockholder when his or her acceptance of such a Stock Award is entered upon the records of the duly authorized transfer agent of the Company.  An Awardee of a Restricted Stock Unit or Performance Unit shall not have rights equivalent to those of a stockholder until such Awards are settled and Shares are entered upon the records of the duly authorized transfer agent of the Company.


13.Cash Awards.  Cash Awards may be granted either alone, in addition to, or in tandem with other Awards granted under the Plan.  After the Administrator determines that it will offer a Cash Award, it shall advise the Awardee in writing or electronically, by means of an Award Agreement, of the terms, conditions and restrictions related to the Cash Award.  The grant or vesting of a Cash Award may be made contingent on achievement of performance conditions and may be designated as a Performance Award subject to Section 14.

14.Performance Awards.  Performance Awards shall be evidenced by Award Agreements in such form as the Committee shall from time to time by resolutionestablish.  

Performance Awards intended to comply with the provisions of Section 162(m) of the BoardCode may be granted pursuant to the provisions of Directors.

B. Untila program established pursuant to the electionrequirements of directorsSection 162(m) of the Code regarding performance based compensation, including, but not limited to, the Agilent Technologies, Inc. Long-Term Performance Program (or its successor).  Other Performance Awards intended to comply with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code shall be granted pursuant to, and be subject to, such terms and conditions as established by the Committee at the 2019 annual meetingtime of stockholders, tgrant based, in whole or in part, upon the attainment of one or more of the Performance Criteria.  Such Awards shall be based on (a) an individual target set by the Committee in writing with respect to the Performance Period and (b) Performance Criterion or Criteria for the Performance PeriodT (increased or decreased, in each case in accordance with factors adopted by the Committee with respect to the Performance Period that relate to unusual items). he Directors,.  To the extent consistent with the requirements of Section 162(m), the Committee may determine at the time that targets under this Section 14 are established, the extent to which measurement of Performance Criteria may include or exclude certain unusual or non-recurring events, including, without limitation, the following:  the impact of charges for restructuring, discontinued operations, debt redemption or retirement, asset write downs, litigation or claim judgments or settlement, acquisitions or divestitures, foreign exchange gains and losses and other unusual non-recurring items and the cumulative effects of tax or accounting changes. With respect to each Performance Period, Awards shall not be paid unless and until the Committee certifies in writing the extent to which the Performance Criterion/Criteria applicable to a Participant have been achieved or exceeded; provided, however, that the Committee may reduce an individual’s Award calculated pursuant to the preceding sentence in its sole discretion.  For this purpose, a “Performance Period” shall be, with respect to a Participant, any period not exceeding three (3) yearsof time as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.  In this case, the selection and adjustment of applicable Performance Criteria, and the establishment of targets, shall occur in compliance with the rules of Section 162(m) of the Code.  

In addition, the Committee may grant Performance Awards, including, but not limited to New Executive Stock Awards (as defined in Section 6(d)), which are not intended to qualify as “performance based awards” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code.  

15.Non-Employee Director Awards.  Awards may be granted to a Non-Employee Director in the form of Cash Awards, Options, SARs or Stock Awards (including, but not limited to Deferred Shares).  The maximum total grant date fair value of share-based Awards (as measured by the Company for financial accounting purposes) granted to any Non-Employee Director in any single calendar year shall not exceed $750,000.00.  If an Award is made in the form of Deferred Shares, such Deferred Shares shall be credited to the Non-Employee Director’s account under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2005 Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan, or any successor or similar plan.  Awards granted to a Non-Employee Director shall be subject to such conditions as established by the Committee at the time of grant and in accordance with the applicable provisions of this Plan.

16.Dividends Withwith Respect to Stock Awards.  Subject to the provisions of the Plan and any Award Agreement, the recipient of a Stock Award may, if so determined by the Administrator, be entitled to receive, currently or on a deferred basis, cash or stock regular cash dividends, or cash payments or stock units in amounts equivalent to cash or stock dividends on Shares (“dividend equivalents”), with respect to the number of Shares covered by the Stock Award, as determined by the Administrator, in its sole discretion, and the Administrator may provide that such amounts (if any) shall be deemed to have been reinvested in additional Shares or otherwise reinvested.  SuchAny such regular cash dividends or dividend equivalents shall be subject to the same vesting and forfeiture provisions as the underlying Stock Award.  The applicable Award Agreement evidencing the Stock Award shall provide that such  For the avoidance of doubt, in no event will regular cash dividends or dividend equivalents will be forfeitable to the same extent as the underlying Stock Awardbe currently payable on unvested Stock Awards or on earned Stock Awards subject to Performance Criteria.

17.Non-Transferability of Awards.  Unless the agreement or other document evidencing an Award (or an amendment thereto authorized by the Committee) expressly states that the Award is transferable as provided hereunder, no Award granted


under this Plan, nor any interest in such Award, may be sold, assigned, conveyed, gifted, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise transferred in any manner, other than those whoby will or the laws of descent and distribution.  The Committee may grant an Award or amend an outstanding Award to provide that the Award is transferable or assignable (a) in the case of a transfer without the payment of any consideration, to any “family member” as such term is defined in Section 1(a)(5) of the General Instructions to Form S-8 under the Securities Act of 1933, as such may be electedamended from time to time, and (b) in any transfer described in clause (ii) of Section 1(a)(5) of the General Instructions to Form S-8 under the 1933 Act as amended from time to time.  Any Award transferred pursuant to the preceding sentence shall remain subject to substantially the same terms applicable to the Award while held by the holdersParticipant to whom it was granted, as modified as the Committee shall determine appropriate, and as a condition to such transfer the transferee shall execute an agreement agreeing to be bound by such terms.  In addition, an Incentive Stock Option may be transferred or assigned only to the extent consistent with Section 422 of the Code. Any purported assignment, transfer or encumbrance that does not qualify under this Section 17 shall be void and unenforceable against the Company.  

18.Adjustments Upon Changes in Capitalization, Dissolution, Change of Control.

(a)Changes in Capitalization.  Subject to any required action by the stockholders of the Company, if any change is made to the Common Stock subject to the Plan, or subject to any Award (including but not limited to the number and kind of shares of Common Stock), which change results from a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, reincorporation, spinoff, dividend in property other than cash, liquidation dividend, extraordinary cash dividend, exchange of shares, combination or reclassification of the Common Stock, or any other increase, decrease or change in the number or characteristics of outstanding shares of Common Stock effected without receipt of consideration by the Company), the Plan will be appropriately adjusted in the class(es) and maximum number of securities subject to the Plan, the maximum number of securities subject to award to any person under the Plan as provided in order to comply with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code or otherwise, and the outstanding Awards will be appropriately adjusted in the class(es) and number of securities and price per share of the securities subject to such outstanding Awards; provided, however, that conversion of any convertible securities of the Company shall not be deemed to have been “effected without receipt of consideration.” Such adjustment shall be made by the Board, whose determination in that respect shall be final, binding and conclusive.  Except as expressly provided herein, no issuance by the Company of shares of stock of any class, or seriessecurities convertible into shares of stock having a preference over the Common Stock as to dividends or upon liquidation,of any class, shall affect, and no adjustment by reason thereof shall be classified,made with respect to, the securities subject to an Award.

(b)Dissolution or Liquidation.  In the event of the proposed dissolution or liquidation of the Company, the Administrator shall notify each Awardee as soon as practicable prior to the effective date of such proposed transaction.  The Administrator in its discretion may provide for an Option or SAR to be fully vested and exercisable until ten (10) days prior to such transaction, or such shorter administratively reasonable period of time as the Administrator may establish in its discretion.  In addition, the Administrator may provide that any restrictions on any Award shall lapse prior to the transaction, provided the proposed dissolution or liquidation takes place at the time and in the manner contemplated.  To the extent it has not been previously exercised, an Award will terminate immediately prior to the consummation of such proposed transaction.

(c)Change of Control.  In the event there is a Change of Control, as defined below, all Options and SARs will fully vest immediately prior to the closing of the transaction and all restrictions on Cash Awards or Stock Awards will lapse immediately prior to the closing of the transaction. The foregoing shall not apply where such Options, SARs, Cash Awards and Stock Awards are assumed, converted or replaced in full by the successor corporation or a parent or subsidiary of the successor; provided, however, that in the event of a Change of Control in which one or more of the successor or a parent or subsidiary of the successor has issued publicly traded equity securities, the assumption, conversion, replacement or continuation shall be made by an entity with publicly traded securities and shall provide that the holders of such assumed, converted, replaced or continued stock options and SARs shall be able to acquire such publicly traded securities.

For the purposes of this Section 18(c), “Change of Control” means the occurrence of any of the following events:

(i)The sale, exchange, lease or other disposition or transfer of all or substantially all of the consolidated assets of the Company to a person or group (as such terms are defined or described in Sections 3(a)(9) and 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) which will continue the business of the Company in the future; or

(ii)A merger or consolidation (or similar form of reorganization) involving the Company in which the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to such merger or consolidation are not the beneficial owners (within the meaning of Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of more than 75% of the total voting power of the outstanding voting securities of the corporation resulting from such transaction in substantially the same proportion as their ownership of the total voting power of the outstanding voting securities of the Company immediately prior to such merger or consolidation; or


(iii)A merger or consolidation (or similar form of reorganization) involving the Company in which occurs the acquisition of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of at least 25% of the total voting power of the outstanding voting securities of the Company by a person or group (as such terms are defined or described in Sections 3(a)(9) and 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act).

(iv)Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent that any amount constituting nonqualified deferral compensation subject to Section 409A of the Code would become payable under the Plan by reason of a Change of Control, such amount shall become payable only if the event constituting a Change of Control would also constitute a change in ownership or effective control of the Company, or a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of the Company, within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code.

19.Amendment and Termination of the Plan.

(a)Amendment and Termination.  The Committee may at any time amend, alter, suspend or terminate the Plan.

(b)Stockholder Approval.  The Company shall obtain stockholder approval of any Plan amendment which would increase the maximum number of Shares for which they severally hold office, into three classes, as nearly equalAwards may be granted under this Plan (other than an increase pursuant to Section 1618 of this Plan), and otherwise to the extent necessary and desirable to comply with Applicable Laws.

(c)Effect of Amendment or Termination.  No amendment, alteration, suspension or termination of the Plan shall impair the rights of any Award, unless mutually agreed otherwise between the Awardee and the Administrator, which agreement must be in number as possible,writing and signed by the Awardee and the Company.  Termination of the Plan shall not affect the Administrator’s ability to exercise the powers granted to it hereunder with respect to Awards granted under the Plan prior to the date of such termination.

20.Designation of Beneficiary.

(a)AnIf authorized in the applicable Award Agreement, an Awardee may file a written designation of a beneficiary who is to receive the Awardee’s rights pursuant to Awardee’s Award or the Awardee may include his or her Awards in an omnibus beneficiary designation for all benefits under the Plan.  To the extent that Awardee has completed a prior designation of beneficiary, such beneficiary designation shall remain in effect with respect to any Award hereunder until changed by the Awardee.  Such designations may be subject to local law and accordingly may be unenforceable in certain jurisdictions.

(b)Such designation of beneficiary may be changed by the Awardee at any time by written notice.  In the event of the death of an Awardee and in the absence of a beneficiary validly designated under the Plan who is living at the time of such Awardee’s death, the Company shall, subject to local law, allow the executor or administrator of the estate of the Awardee to exercise the Award, or if no such executor or administrator has been appointed (to the knowledge of the Company), the Company, in its discretion, may allow the spouse or one classor more dependents or relatives of the Awardee to exercise the Award.

21.Legal Compliance.  Shares shall not be issued pursuant to a Stock Award or the exercise of an Option unless the Stock Award or the exercise of such Option and the issuance and delivery of such Shares shall comply with Applicable Laws and shall be further subject to the approval of counsel for the Company with respect to such compliance.

22.Inability to Obtain Authority.  To the extent the Company is unable to or the Administrator deems it infeasible to obtain authority from any regulatory body having jurisdiction, which authority is deemed by the Company’s counsel to be necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any Shares hereunder, the Company shall be relieved of any liability with respect to the failure to issue or sell such Shares as to which such requisite authority shall not have been obtained.

23.Reservation of Shares.  The Company, during the term of this Plan, will at all times reserve and keep available such number of Shares as shall be sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the Plan.

24.Stockholder Approval.  The Plan shall bewas originally elected for a term expiring adopted by the Board on November 19, 2008, and this amendment and restatement was adopted by the Board on November 15, 2017, subject to approval by the stockholders of the Company within twelve (12) months of the date the Plan is adoptedat the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2000, another class to be originally elected for a term expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2001, and another class to be originally elected for a term expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2002, with each class to hold office until its successor is duly elected and qualified. At each succeeding annual meeting of stockholdersprior to the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, directors elected to succeed those directors whose terms then expireon March 21, 2018 (the “Effective Date”).  Such stockholder approval shall be elected for a term of office to expire at the third succeeding annual meeting of stockholders after their election., with each director to hold office until such person’s successor shall have been elected and qualified. Commencing at the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, directors, other than those who may be elected by the holders of any class or series of stock having a preference over the Common Stock as to dividends or upon liquidation, shall be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the next annual meeting of stockholders following their election and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Accordingly, at the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, directors in the class whose terms expire at that meeting shall be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified; at the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders, directors in the class whose terms expire at that meeting shall be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified; and at the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders and at each annual meeting of stockholders thereafter, all directors shall be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the next annual meeting of stockholders following their election and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. All directors, subject to such director’s earlier death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal from office, shall hold office until the expiration of the term for which he or she was elected, and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified. From and after the election of directors at the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders, any director or the entire board of directors may be removed from office for cause or without cause by the holders of a majority of the shares then entitled to vote at an election of directors.



Table of Contents

ANNEXES


C. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Article VII, each director shall serve until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her death, resignation or removal. No decrease in the number of directors constituting the Board of Directors shall shorten the term of any incumbent director.

D. Any vacancies on the Board of Directors resulting from death, resignation, disqualification, removal, or other causes unless the Board of Directors determines by resolution that any such vacancies or newly created directorships shall be filled by stockholders, except as otherwise provided by law, shall be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors then in office, even though less than a quorum of the Board of Directors and not by the stockholders.

E. In furtherance and not in limitation of the powers conferred by the laws of the State of Delaware, the Board of Directors is expressly authorized to make, alter, amend or repeal the Bylaws of the Corporation.

F. The directors of the Corporation need not be elected by written ballot unless the Bylaws of the Corporation so provide.

G. Advance notice of stockholder nomination for the election of directors and of any other business to be brought by stockholders before any meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation shall be givenobtained in the manner provided in the Bylaws of the Corporation.



Table of Contents

ANNEXES


Annex B

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS
OF AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Additions are underlined, deletions are struck-out)

Sections 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5 of Article III of the Amended and Restated Bylaws shall be amended and restated as follows:

3.3Election and Term of Office of Directors. Except as provided in the Certificate of Incorporation or Section 3.4 of these Bylaws,until the election of directors at the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders, directors shall be classified, with respect to the time for which they severally hold office, into three classes, as nearly equal in number as possible, one class to be originally elected for a term expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2000, another class to be originally elected for a term expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2001, and another class to be originally elected for a term expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2002, with each class to hold office until its successor is duly elected and qualified. At each succeeding annual meeting of stockholdersprior to the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, directors elected to succeed those directors whose terms then expire shall be elected for a term of office to expire at the third succeeding annual meeting of stockholders after their election, with each director to hold office until such person’s successor shall have been elected and qualified or until such person’s earlier resignation or removal. Each director, including a director elected or appointed to fill a vacancy, shall hold office until his successor is elected and qualified or until his earlier resignation or removal.Commencing at the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, directors, other than those who may be elected by the holders of any class or series of stock having a preference over the Common Stock as to dividends or upon liquidation, shall be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the next annual meeting of stockholders following their election and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Accordingly, at the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, directors in the class whose terms expire at that meeting shall be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified; at the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders, directors in the class whose terms expire at that meeting shall be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified; and at the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders and at each annual meeting of stockholders thereafter, all directors shall be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the next annual meeting of stockholders following their election and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. All directors, subject to such director’s earlier death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal from office, shall hold office until the expiration of the term for which he or she was elected, and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified.

Except as provided in Section 3.4 of these Bylaws, each director shall be elected by the vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to the director at any meeting for the election of directors at which a quorum is present, provided that if the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected, the directors shall be elected by the vote of a plurality of the shares represented in person or by proxy at any such meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors. For purposes of this paragraph, a majority of the votes cast means that the number of shares voted “for” a director must exceed 50% of the votes cast with respect to that director. The votes cast shall include votes to withhold authority in each case and exclude abstentions with respect to that director’s election. If an incumbent director is not elected due to a failure to receive a majority of the votes cast as described above and his or her successor is not otherwise elected and qualified, the director shall offer to tender his or her resignation to the Board of Directors promptly following the certification of the stockholder vote. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will consider the offer to resign and make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether



Table of Contents

ANNEXES


other action should be taken. The Board of Directors will act on the Committee’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days from the date of the certification of the election results. Any director who tenders his or her offer to resign shall not participate in either the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee’s or Board of Directors’ consideration or other actions regarding whether to accept the resignation offer. However, if each member of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee failed to receive a majority of the votes cast at the same election, then the independent directors who did receive a majority of the votes cast shall appoint a committee amongst themselves to consider the resignation offers and recommend to the Board of Directors whether to accept them. However, if the only directors who received a majority of the votes cast in the same election constitute three or fewer directors, all directors may participate in the action regarding whether to accept the resignation offers.

If an incumbent director offers to resign pursuant to the foregoing paragraph and the resignation offer is not accepted by the Board of Directors, such director shall continue to serve until the next annual meeting and until his or her successor is duly elected, or his or her earlier resignation or removal. If a director’s resignation is accepted by the Board of Directors, or if a nominee for director is not elected and the nominee is not an incumbent director, then the Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, may fill any resulting vacancy pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.4 hereof or may decrease the size of the Board of Directors pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.2 hereof.

Except as otherwise provided in the foregoing two paragraphs, each director, including a director elected or appointed to fill a vacancy, shall hold office until his successor is elected and qualified or until his earlier resignation or removal.

Directors need not be stockholders unless sodegree required by the Certificate of Incorporation or by these Bylaws; wherein other qualifications for directors may be prescribed. Election of directors need not be by written ballot unless so required by the Certificate of Incorporation or by these Bylaws; wherein other qualifications for directors may be prescribed.under Applicable Laws.


3.425.Resignation and VacanciesNotice.  Any director may resign effective on giving written notice to the chairmanCompany required by any provisions of this Plan shall be addressed to the Secretary of the board, the chief executive officer, the secretary or the board of directors, unless the notice specifies a later time for that resignation to become effective. If the resignation of a director isCompany and shall be effective at a future time, the board of directors may elect a successor to take office when the resignation becomes effective.received.

Unless otherwise provided in the Certificate of Incorporation or these Bylaws:

(i)Vacancies and newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the authorized number of directors elected by all of the stockholders having the right to vote as a single class may be filled by a majority of the directors then in office, even if less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director. Each director so elected shall hold office for the remainder of the full term of the class of directors in which the new directorship was created or the vacancy occurred and until a successor has been elected and qualified.
(ii)Whenever the holders of any class or classes of stock or series thereof are entitled to elect one or more directors by the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation, vacancies and newly created directorships of such class or classes or series may be filled by a majority of the directors elected by such class or classes or series thereof then in office, or by a sole remaining director so elected.

If at any time, by reason of death or resignation or other cause, the corporation should have no directors in office, then any officer or any stockholder or an executor, administrator, trustee or guardian of a stockholder, or other fiduciary entrusted with like responsibility for the person or estate



26.Table of ContentsGoverning Law; Forum

ANNEXES


of a stockholder, may call a special meeting of stockholders solely for the purpose of electing directors in accordance with the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation or these Bylaws, or may apply to the Court of Chancery for a decree summarily ordering an election as provided in Section 211 of the General Corporation Law of Delaware.

If, at the time of filling any vacancy or any newly created directorship, the directors then in office constitute less than a majority of the whole board (as constituted immediately prior to any such increase), then the Court of Chancery may, upon application of any stockholder or stockholders holding at least ten percent (10%) of the total number of the then outstanding shares having the right to vote for such directors, summarily order an election to be held to fill any such vacancies or newly created directorships, or to replace the directors chosen by the directors then in office as aforesaid, which election.  This Plan and all determinations made and actions taken pursuant hereto shall be governed by the provisionssubstantive laws, but not the choice of law rules, of the state of Delaware.  Any proceeding arising out of or relating to this Plan may be brought only in the state or federal courts located in the Northern District of California.  The Company and the Participants irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of such courts in any such proceeding, waive any objection to venue or to convenience of forum, agree that all claims in respect of any proceeding shall be heard and determined only in such courts and agree not to bring any proceeding arising out of or relating to the Plan in any other court, whether inside or outside of the United States

27.Unfunded Plan.  Insofar as it provides for Awards, the Plan shall be unfunded.  Although bookkeeping accounts may be established with respect to Participants who are granted Awards of Shares under this Plan, any such accounts will be used merely as a bookkeeping convenience.  Except for the holding of Restricted Stock in escrow pursuant to Section 12, the Company shall not be required to segregate any assets which may at any time be represented by Awards, nor shall this Plan be construed as providing for such segregation, nor shall the Company nor the Administrator be deemed to be a trustee of stock or cash to be awarded under the Plan.  Any liability of the Company to any Awardee with respect to an Award shall be based solely upon any contractual obligations which may be created by the Plan; no such obligation of the Company shall be deemed to be secured by any pledge or other encumbrance on any property of the Company.  Neither the Company nor the Administrator shall be required to give any security or bond for the performance of any obligation, which may be created by this Plan.

28.Section 409A of the Code.  This Plan is intended to comply with, or otherwise be exempt from, Section 409A of the Code and shall be construed, administered and interpreted with that intent.  Restricted Stock Units, Performance Units and Deferred Shares which are settleable, and Cash Awards which are payable, as a result of a Participant’s termination of Service which constitute a “deferral of compensation” for purposes of Section 211409A of the General Corporation LawCode shall not be paid unless and until the Participant incurs a “separation from service” for purposes of Delaware as far as applicable.

3.5Removal. Unless otherwise restricted by statute, bySection 409A of the CertificateCode.  In addition, to the extent an Award constituting a deferral of Incorporationcompensation is distributable to a Participant who is a “specified employee” (as defined in Section 409A of the Code), such Award shall not be distributed to the Participant before the date (the “Delayed Payment Date”) which is the first day of the seventh month after the date of the Participant’s separation from service or, by these Bylaws,if earlier, the date of the Participant’s death following such separation from service.  All such amounts that would, but for this Section 28, become distributable prior to the electionDelayed Payment Date will be accumulated and paid on the Delayed Payment Date.  To the extent that the Committee, in its sole discretion, provides that the settlement, or payment, of directors at the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders, any director or the entire board of directorsan Award may be removed from office only for cause by the holders of a majority of the shares then entitled to votedeferred at an election of directors.From and after the election of directors at the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders,a Participant, then any director or the entire board of directors maysuch deferral election shall be removed from office for cause or without causesubject to such rules and procedures as determined by the holdersCommittee in its sole discretion, and such deferrals shall be structured to comply with the requirements of a majoritySection 409A of the shares then entitled to vote at an election of directors.Code.  



Table of Contents







   IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION   




Agilent Technologies  ltMPORTANTANNUALMEETINGINFORMATION I  0 0 0 0 0 4  ENDORSEMENT_LINE  SACKPACK,  _  l...ll..l.l..llll.t.t....tl..l.l..ll• • l..lll...l  MRASAMPLE  DESIGNATION  (IF ANY) ADD1  ADD2  ADD 3  ADD 4  ADD 5 ADD 6  111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111  IIWIIWIIWrn rn rn rn IIWIIWIIWIIWIIWIIWIIWrn  2M 7M  000000000.000000 ext  000000000.000000 ext  000000000.000000 ext  000000000.000000 ext  000000000.000000 ext  000000000.000000 ext C123456789 Electronic Voting Instructions

Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!

Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.

VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.

BAR Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by  1:00 a.m., Central Time, on March 16, 2016.

Vote by Internet
●   Go towww.envisionreports.com/agilent
●   Or scan the QR code with your smartphone
●   Follow the steps outlined on the secure website

21, 2018.  Vote by Internet  Go to www.envisionreports.com/agilent  oofi  • Or scan the QR code with your smartphone  Follow the steps outlined on the secure website  Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.  Vote by telephone
●   Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone
●   Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message


Using ablack ink pen, mark your votes with anX as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.


Annual Meeting Proxy Card

  Annual Meeting Proxy Card  ( 1234 5678 9012 345 )  T IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
 A  Proposals —T  IJ Proposals - The Board recommends a voteFOR all nominees andFOR Proposals 2, 3 and 4.
1. Election of Directors: To elect three directors to a 3-year term. At the annual meeting, the Board of Directors intends to present the following nominees for election as directors:       
   For  Against  Abstain      For  Against  Abstain      For  Against  Abstain   
01 - Paul N. Clark 02 - James G. Cullen  03 - Tadataka Yamada, M.D. 
 


      For    Against    Abstain                For    Against    Abstain  
2. To ratify the Audit and Finance Committee’s appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Agilent’s independent registered public accounting firm.3. To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of Agilent’s named executive officers.
  
4.To approve amendments to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to declassify the Board.5.To consider such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting.

 B  Non-Voting Items
Change of Address— Please print your new address below.Comments— Please print your comments below.Meeting Attendance
Mark the box to the right if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.
 C  Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below
Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title.
Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.
/        /



Table of Contents














 ▼ IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. ▼


Proxy — AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Annual MeetingDirectors recommends a vote FOR all the listed nominees  and FOR Proposals  2, 3 and 4.  1. Election of Stockholders—March 16, 2016

This Proxy is solicited on behalf ofDirectors: To elect three directors to a three-year term. At the annual meeting, the Board of Directors.Directors intends to present the following nominees for election as directors:  +  For  Against Abstain  For  Against Abstain  For  Against Abstain  01

The undersigned hereby appoints Michael R.Koh Boon Hwee  D D D 02 •Michael  R McMullen  0 0  0  03 •Daniel K. Podolsky, M.D.  0 0  0  For  Against Abstain  For  Against Abstain  2. To approve the amendment and Michael Tang,restatement of our  2009 Stock Plan.  3. To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers.  4. To ratify the Audit and eachFinance Committee's appointment of them,PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as proxies for the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to act and to vote all the shares of Common Stock of Agilent Technologies, Inc. held of record by the undersigned on January 19, 2016, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Wednesday, March 16, 2016, or any postponement or adjournment thereof.

IMPORTANT—This Proxy must be signed and dated on the reverse side.

THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR ITEMS Agilent's independent registered public accounting firm.  1]1 2, 3 AND 4.

In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote uponNon-Voting Items  DOD  5. To consider such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting. Mark the box to the right if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED

If Mark the box to the right  D  Change of Address- Please print your new address below.  Comments- Please print your comments below.  Meeting Attendance Annual Meeting  I....  .II....  . if you vote by telephone orplan to attend the  Internet, please DO NOT mail back this proxy card.

(Continued andB Authorized Signatures -This section must be completed for your vote to be voted on reverse side.counted. -Date and Sign Below  Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title.  Date (mm/dd/yyyy)- Please print date below.  Signature 1 -Please keep signature within the box.  Signature 2- Please keep signature within the box.  I  I  II......__  .II......__  .  c 1234567890  JNT  MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE  • 1111111111111111111111111111  1 U PX  3  5  5  6  2  2  1  140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND  02QMFC